District evaluation advisory committee office of accountability
Download
1 / 44

District Evaluation Advisory Committee Office of Accountability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 150 Views
  • Uploaded on

District Evaluation Advisory Committee Office of Accountability. Ms. Brenda Patterson, Chief Accountability Officer Mr. Sham Bacchus, Interim Executive Director Dr. Burnie Bristow, Interim Director Dr. Vanessa Serrano, Interim Supervisor Tammy Williams, Program Coordinator

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' District Evaluation Advisory Committee Office of Accountability' - leonard-whitehead


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
District evaluation advisory committee office of accountability

District Evaluation Advisory CommitteeOffice of Accountability

Ms. Brenda Patterson, Chief Accountability Officer

Mr. Sham Bacchus, Interim Executive Director

Dr. Burnie Bristow, Interim Director

Dr. Vanessa Serrano, Interim Supervisor

Tammy Williams, Program Coordinator

Evelyn McLeod, Confidential Secretary

DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow


Welcome district evaluation advisory committee

Welcome District EvaluationAdvisory Committee

DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow


  • AGENDA

  • Office of Accountability

  • DEAC Committee Meeting

  • April 23, 2013 Facilitator: Dr. Burnie Bristow, NBCT

  • 90 Delaware Avenue Cafeteria, 2:30-4:30 pm

  • Thoroughly Trained

  • 2:30-2:40 Meet and Greet

  • 2:40-2:50 Revisit Roles and Responsibilities of the DEAC Committee

  • 2:50-3:05 Steering Committee Updates

  • Sub-Committee

  • Student Information System

  • 3:05 AchieveNJUpdates

  • 3:05-3:20 Non-Tested Grades and Subjects

    • Developing Student Growth Objectives (Teacher Focus)

  • 3:20-3:35 Tested Grades and Subjects

    • Student Growth Percentiles (Teacher Focus)

    • Developing Student Growth Objectives (Teacher Focus)

  • 3:35-3:40 Summer Professional Development Opportunities for Teachers

  • 3:40-4:00 Exemplary Teacher Training

  • -Dave Roudebush, Ph.D., Curriculum Focal Point

  • 4:00-4:25 How will the Paterson Public School District define “THOROUGHLY TRAINED”?

  • 4:25-4:30 Action Items:

  • Next steps

  • Deliverables

  • Next meeting date

  • DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow


    Roles and Responsibilities of the DEAC Committee The DEAC committee (formed Dec. 2011) functions as an advisor to the Paterson Public Schools in the implementation of the TEACH NJ Act.  Embedded in the TEACHNJ Act is a requirement to revise the Principal and Teacher Evaluation System.  Membership on the DEAC Committee provides an opportunity for committee members toprovide feedback on the performance rubrics, program development and implementation at the school and community level.  The DEAC committee is comprised of teachers, principals, central office staff, school board members and parents.

    DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow


    Teacher Effectiveness and Accountability for the Children of New Jersey (TEACHNJ) Act.”

    The goal of this legislation is to raise student achievement by improving instruction through the adoption of evaluations that provide specific feedback to educators, inform the provision of aligned professional development, and inform personnel decisions;

    DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow


    Cross departmental steering committee

    Cross-Departmental Steering Committee New Jersey (TEACHNJ) Act.”

    Update on the Student Information System

    Sham Bacchus

    DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow


    Current Data Sources/Systems that directly impact new Evaluation Instrument

    Currently requires human input from schools and central office. (Error Laden) - 17

    Currently gets data from other systems. (Preferred) - 5

    Brenda Patterson, Chief Accountability Officer, PPS


    Data Integration Evaluation Instrument

    There was a need for an internal review of the programs, processes and technical components required to effectively support the implementation of the new Principal and Teacher Evaluation. This review of our infrastructure necessitated a cross departmental collaboration to integrate various systems.

    DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow


    Communications, Business, HR Assessment, MIS, Technology Evaluation Instrument

    • Merging platform ALIO and MIS

    • Support to assessment

    • Develop data platform to record and keep track of teacher and school achievement data

    • Teacher E-board / blog /Dropbox

    Collaborative Teams as Decision Makers:

    Communications/Technology/MIS,

    Business,

    Reform - Assessment/HR/PD,

    C & I,

    Special Programs and Accountability


    April 2013

    April, Evaluation Instrument2013

    Student Growth ObjectivesIntroduction to the Guidebookw/ Sham Bacchus


    Charlotte mecklenburg slo study
    Charlotte –Mecklenburg SLO study Evaluation Instrument

    Key findings:

    • The higher the quality of the SLO, the more likely it is to be attained

    • The quality of SLOs increases significantly in just two years

    • Students whose teachers had higher quality SLOs achieve higher scores on math and ELA tests

    • Students whose teachers met their SLOs achieve higher scores on math and ELA tests


    Charlotte mecklenburg slo study1
    Charlotte –Mecklenburg SLO study Evaluation Instrument

    What principals said about SLOs

    “The way of doing business in the school is the SLO process. It adds to the spirit of cooperation.”

    “Developing SLOs forces teachers to target low performing kids and then work harder to pull those kids up.”

    “We have moved from a priority school to a high growth school, and I give a lot of credit for this change to the SLO process.”


    Charlotte mecklenburg slo study2
    Charlotte –Mecklenburg SLO study Evaluation Instrument

    What mattered most in the SLO process

    • Analyze student baseline data, for use in planning and teaching

    • Set individual student growth targets, for both more informative and accurate assessment of student learning

    • Participate in collegial collaboration in the development of SLOs


    Shift in practice

    Shift in Practice Evaluation Instrument

    Student Growth Objectives

    DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow

    Brenda Patterson, Chief Accountability Officer, PPS


    What is an sgo
    What is an SGO? Evaluation Instrument

    • A Student Growth Objective is a long-term academic goal that teachers set for groups of students and must be:

    • Specific and measureable

    • Aligned to New Jersey’s curriculum standards

    • Based on available prior student learning data

    • A measure of student learning between two points in time

    • Ambitious and achievable

    Page 3


    NTGS 101: Student Growth Objective Overview Evaluation Instrument

    Different types of Student Growth Objectives: Student Growth Objectives can take many different forms

    17


    NTGS 101: Specific Student Growth Objective Evaluation Instrument

    Specific Objective: Examples

    The word “specific objective” would likely be used to identify anything that does not cover your general population or is not a cumulative test

    18


    Sgos in achieve nj requirements
    SGOs in Achieve NJ - requirements Evaluation Instrument

    • A teacher develops SGOs in consultation with his or her principal.

    • All teachers who receive an SGP score must set between 1 and 2 SGOs.

    • Teachers who do not receive an SGP score must set 2 SGOs.

    • SGOs must be aligned to NJCCCS or CCSS and measure student achievement and/or growth.

    • SGOs must be specific and measurable and based on available student learning data.


    NTGS 101: Pilot Districts Evaluation Instrument

    Student Achievement Goals (SAGs): Pilot Districts were given the recommendation to use SAGs for the 2012 – 2013 school year

    DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow


    NTGS 101: SGO – a high school biology example Evaluation Instrument

    SGO Components: General Timeline

    August

    November


    NTGS 101: SGO – a high school biology example Evaluation Instrument

    SGO Components: General Timeline

    January

    June


    Teacher Evaluation: Evaluation InstrumentSummative Rating Timeline

    • At summative conference, all available component scores (i.e. teacher practice, SGO results) will be discussed.

    • SGP data will be available on the following timeline.

    Teacher Practice

    Student Growth Percentile

    Student Growth Objective

    Sum. Rating


    5 steps
    5 Steps Evaluation Instrument

    • Step 1: Choose or develop a quality assessment aligned to NJCCCS or CCSS.

    • Step 2: Determine students’ starting points.

    • Step 3: Set ambitious and achievable SGOs with the approval of the principal/supervisor.

    • Step 4: Track progress, refine instruction.

    • Step 5: Review results and score in consultation with your principal/supervisor.

    Page 8 – Quick Start Guide


    Page 10 Evaluation Instrument


    • Develop assessments collaboratively. Evaluation Instrument

    • Align all assessments with NJCCCS or CCSS.

    • Align all assessments with district, school and department goals.

    • Make sure all the content in your SGO is covered in the assessment.

    • Incorporate test items that vary in levels of difficulty.

    • Include a sufficient number of test items to ensure rigor.

    • Collaboratively determine possible modifications to meet the needs of students.

    • Develop rubrics to assess essay responses.

    • Make sure content- and skill-based rubrics are specific and address multiple levels of proficiency.

    Page 11


    Page 26 Evaluation Instrument


    Page 27 Evaluation Instrument


    Page 28 Evaluation Instrument


    Page 13 Evaluation Instrument


    Sgo guidebook development
    SGO Guidebook Development Evaluation Instrument

    Continuous improvement with information from the field

    • Modification and addition of forms

    • Clarity of language

    • Models of SGOs

    • More guidance on assessments, including portfolios


    Summer professional development
    Summer Professional Development Evaluation Instrument

    Dr. Vanessa Serrano


    Principal and teacher evaluation system training discussion

    Principal and Teacher Evaluation System Training Discussion Evaluation Instrument

    Dr. Dave Roudebush, Focal Point

    April 23, 2013


    Teacher evaluation system
    Teacher Evaluation System Evaluation Instrument

    • Performance Standard #1: Preparation for Instruction

      • Establishing a culture of high expectations for learning and achievement

      • Uses district adopted curriculum and content knowledge to design coherent lessons

      • Post aligned lesson objectives and plan for demonstration of learning


    Teacher evaluation system1
    Teacher Evaluation System Evaluation Instrument

    • Performance Standard #2: Use of Data to Inform Instruction

      • Focus on improving instruction using data

      • Use a variety of assessment methods when designing classroom assessments

      • Involve students in assessing their own learning


    Teacher evaluation system2
    Teacher Evaluation System Evaluation Instrument

    • Performance Standard #3: Delivers Quality Instruction

      • Instruct bell to bell

      • Use a variety of instructional strategies to focus instruction

      • Engages students in learning

      • Continually checks for understanding

      • Deliver rigorous and relevant content

      • Integrate 21st Century Skills in instruction

      • Provides feedback about student proficiency


    Teacher evaluation system3
    Teacher Evaluation System Evaluation Instrument

    • Performance Standard #4: Interventions to Meet Diverse Needs

      • Differentiate instruction based on student needs and background

      • Implements interventions with fidelity and adjusts interventions based on results

      • Adapt and modify instruction for the unique needs of learners


    Teacher evaluation system4
    Teacher Evaluation System Evaluation Instrument

    • Performance Standard #5: Classroom Environment

      • Contribute to a safe and orderly learning environment

      • Use effective classroom management procedures

      • Effectively manage student behavior

      • Foster collaboration and self-regulation in students

      • Promote positive and respectful rapport


    Teacher evaluation system5
    Teacher Evaluation System Evaluation Instrument

    • Performance Standard #6: Leadership

      • Understand their role and responsibility for professional growth and positive leadership

      • Promote the concept of Professional Learning Communities through collaboration and purposeful involvement

      • Continue professional growth


    Teacher evaluation system6
    Teacher Evaluation System Evaluation Instrument

    • Performance Standard #7: Professional Responsibilities

      • Adhere to Federal laws, state statutes and regulation pertaining to education, Board of Education policies, Memoranda of Understanding and school rules

      • Demonstrates professionalism

      • Effectively communicates and solves problems


    Teacher evaluation system professional development opportunities
    Teacher Evaluation System Evaluation InstrumentProfessional Development Opportunities

    • Two Major Professional Development Strands

      • Curriculum Alignment/Instructional Strategies

      • The Teacher Evaluation Performance Rubric


    Professional development opportunities
    Professional Development Opportunities Evaluation Instrument

    • Aug. 18-19, 2011 * Aug. 25-27, 2011

    • Sep. 19-21, 2011 * Oct. 8, 2011

    • Aug. 21-30, 2012 * Sep. 4-5, 2012

    • Oct. 12, 2012 * Feb. 15, 2013

      To Date 2,300 teachers have been trained

      Approximately 202 teachers need to be trained


    Thoroughly Train Teachers: Evaluation Instrument

    Stop.

    Reflect and Discuss:

    Think about what you have seen presented here,

    How will the Paterson Public School District define “THOROUGHLY TRAINED”?

    Please write down and discuss your thoughts and ideas at your table. Please be prepared to share your most salient ideas with the committee.

    DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow


    Next Steps Evaluation Instrument

    DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow


    THANK-YOU Evaluation Instrument

    DEAC Meeting-April 23, 2013-Dr. Burnie Bristow


    ad