1 / 22

What Drives Investment Decisions in choosing Waste-To-Energy Conversion Technologies

What Drives Investment Decisions in choosing Waste-To-Energy Conversion Technologies. John Baker, Alan Environmental George Voss, Sustainability Business Management. Incineration;. Waste Heat From Incinerators Can Be Used to Provide Heat and Power (WHP). Drawbacks Expensive

lenora
Download Presentation

What Drives Investment Decisions in choosing Waste-To-Energy Conversion Technologies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. What Drives Investment Decisions in choosing Waste-To-Energy Conversion Technologies John Baker, Alan Environmental George Voss, Sustainability Business Management

  2. Incineration;

  3. Waste Heat From Incinerators Can Be Used to Provide Heat and Power (WHP) Drawbacks • Expensive • Relatively Inefficient • Environmental Concerns

  4. Waste to Energy Incudes Anaerobic Digestion;

  5. Cogeneration Systems (CHP) Can Efficiently Convert Digester Gas to Electricity(~40%)&Heat(~50%) Digester Biogas CHP Power Generation Plant with “Plug & Play” Container Module, including Gas Conditioning & Treatment System

  6. Waste to Syngas

  7. Gasification Technologies convert a variety of waste into clean energy & commercial materials

  8. Ability to Recover Recyclables Upfront • Sustainability, environmental, economic and a philosophy of zero-waste-to-landfill drive consideration • Municipalities have goals to meet • State mandates • Environmental groups fear WtE will reduce recycling • Increases BTU value of remaining feedstock • Recovers inert material that does not add to energy

  9. Beneficial Use of Waste and Marketability of Products • All WtE systems create residues • Incinerator ash is mostly landfilled • Digesters have sludge and wastewater • Sludge can be composted and nutrients recovered from wastewater • Gasifiers create either a powder-like ash can be used as soil or cement additive or vitrified ash (high temperature Plasma) can be used as construction materials • All WtE projects must take in to account all residuals requiring disposal and the potential marketability of residuals that may be recycled

  10. Non-recyclable waste diversion rate • Important to clients that have Corporate mandate for “Zero” waste to landfills • State mandates and EPA waste management hierarchy has landfill ranked last • Environmentalists favor highest diversion rates from landfill • The cost savings associated with diversion (equivalent to savings from avoiding tip fees) oftentimes drives the initial economics of waste-to-energy implementations

  11. Experience and FinancialResources of Company • Management team important especially if the only offer on the table is a turnkey installation] • Management team needs to have technical resources for on-going support of WtE that are sold • WtE company needs to have financial resources to have guarantees and post performance bonds, etc. • WtE company financials need to show they will continue to exist in order to support the technology

  12. Facility Size (acres and height) and Design Flexibility, including Design Soundness, • Based on feedstock (i.e., waste) tons(gallons)/day capacity, with fuel flexibility important in influencing economics • Ability to fit seamlessly for on-site WtE operations • Easy to operate automatically and monitor remotely • Needs to be safe and have safety approvals- like UL, CE, etc for local codes/regulations

  13. Feasibility of obtaining all construction and operating permits • Political and environmentalist climate • Public/community relations • State and Federal Agency experience with permitting similar technologies • Local regulatory support • Attainment vs. non-attainment considerations for air permit • More environmental permitting challenges are usually experienced in terms of length of approval process and technology review if hazardous wastes are utilized

  14. Ownership Preference • In some cases, clients prefer to own and operate Wte equipment and facilities • If a client wants to own a new technology, starting with a lease may be preferable so can gain on-site experience and confidence in eventually buying the technology • Most technologies need to have trained operators • Material handling experience is required • Some suppliers will only provide turnkey systems for concerns of inappropriate operations could cause system failures

  15. Pre-processing of Fuel Mix • Determine if material handling/pre-processing is included in price/lease of equipment • Varies by technology- some take in waste “as-is” • Some require shredding/sizing • Some require RDF or pelletizing to certain size and dryness (e.g., 15% moisture) • Some require additional small amounts of fossil fuel/catalysts, etc.

  16. Readiness and Reliability, Including Client References • Is technology been proven with 3rd party engineering studies? • Has the technology been commercially proven and meeting performance efficiencies, environmental and compliance permit requirements? • Are plant tours available? • Can delivery schedules be met or are there back-log issues?

  17. Risk Allocation • Technology insurable? • Performance bond rating. • Shared risk? • Experience with solving problems at operating plants (e.g., retrofits, redesigns, etc)

  18. Capital, Operating, Financing, and Tip Fees • Proforma for 15-20 year operating life including labor, consumable materials, parasitic load factors, feedstock contracts, recycling contracts for residuals,ROI, • Comparisons of existing options for waste disposal • Energy incentives, government grants, low interest lending programs for renewable energy projects can play an important role in initiating a waste-to-energy project

  19. Standard Contractual Termsand Conditions • Evaluation of supplier contracts for turnkey, sale or lease options • Legal review • Non-performance criteria

  20. Thermal and Energy Efficiency • Compare energy output per volume/ton of waste among suppliers reviewed • Some have capx higher for the same waste capacity but have higher energy production

  21. Utility Needs • Sewer, water, electrical, fossil fuel needs • New construction required or existing on-site

  22. Contact Us

More Related