1 / 20

Scott Linner Aimsweb Trainer slinner@hotmail.com 651-366-2731 Aimsweb support

Scott Linner Aimsweb Trainer slinner@hotmail.com 651-366-2731 Aimsweb support . State Assessment. District. School. Tests of Early Literacy. CBM. Reading trajectories are established early and become more difficult to change. --Roland Good. 3rd Grade State Benchmark in Reading - ORF.

lenka
Download Presentation

Scott Linner Aimsweb Trainer slinner@hotmail.com 651-366-2731 Aimsweb support

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Scott LinnerAimsweb Trainerslinner@hotmail.com651-366-2731Aimsweb support

  2. State Assessment District School Tests of Early Literacy CBM Reading trajectories are established early and become more difficult to change. --Roland Good

  3. 3rd Grade State Benchmark in Reading - ORF Goal of 110 WPM Advanced Benchmark I Proficient Below Proficient Not Proficient R=.706 N=542 3rd grade reading fluency

  4. 3 2 1 Three-Tiered Assessment Model Tier 3: PROGRESS MONITORIntensive monitoring towards specific goals for students at significant risk for failure Tier 2:STRATEGIC MONITORMonthly monitoring for students who are mild to moderate risk for failure Tier 1: BENCHMARKUniversal Screening for all students

  5. Tier 3:PROGRESS MONITORIntensive monitoring towards specific goals for students at risk for failure 3 2 1 1 Tier 2:STRATEGIC MONITORMonthly monitoring for students who are at mild to moderate risk for failure Tier 1:BENCHMARKUniversal Screeningfor all students Three-Tiered Assessment Model: Benchmark

  6. Universal Screening • Identification of students at-risk for failure • Program evaluation across all students • 1-4 minutes to complete AIMSweb® assessments • Some AIMSweb® assessments are individually administered, while others may be done as a group. 1 BENCHMARK : Universal Screening

  7. Measures Currently Available via AIMSweb®: • Early Literacy[K-1 benchmark, Progress Monitor (PM) any age] • Letter Naming Fluency • Letter sound fluency • Phonemic Segmentation Fluency • Nonsense Word Fluency • Early Numeracy (K-1 benchmark, PM any age) • Oral Counting • Number identification • Quantity discrimination • Missing number • Oral Reading (K-8, PM any age) • MAZE (Reading comprehension); (1-8, PM any age) • Math Computation (1-6, PM any age) • Math Facts (PM any age) • Spelling (1-8, PM any age) • Written Expression (1-8, PM any age) All students in an academic curriculum are “benchmarked” three times per year across any/all of these assessment areas.

  8. AIMSweb as a Program Evaluation Tool: Benchmark 3x/year for Universal Screening—AllKids (All identifying information and scores are fictitious.)

  9. Michael Martin: A student with Benchmark Data that indicates he is performing significantly behind peers at his school.

  10. Fall Benchmark Data for Michael Martin Martin, Michael: Grade 5 (All identifying information and scores are fictitious.)

  11. Discussion: Consider Michael’s R-CBM performance in relationship to different AIMSweb® Comparison Groups Grade 5:Michael’s School Grade 5: Michael’s District Grade 5: National Aggregate Norms (All identifying information and scores are fictitious.)

  12. Individual Report: 3rd Grade Student

  13. Data to Know that Things Went Well • QUESTIONS: • What does report suggest about Heather A’s progress? • SPRING: Compared to Grade 3 peers at her school, is Heather performing in the: - Well Above Average Range? - Above Average Range? - Average Range? - Below Average Range? - Well-Below Average Range?

  14. 2 Three-Tiered Assessment Model: Strategic Monitor TIER 3PROGRESS MONITORIntensive monitoring towards specific goals for at-risk students TIER 2STRATEGIC MONITORMonthly monitoring for students who are questionable or of concern TIER 1 BENCHMARKUniversal Screening

  15. AIMSweb as a Program Evaluation Tool: Schools May Strategic Monitor Monthly for students at Mild to Moderate Risk (All identifying information and scores are fictitious.)

  16. Tier 2: Strategic Monitor Strategic Monitor:(1x/month) Provides option to increase assessment frequency from three times per year to once per month for select students. Example of Strategic Monitor report containing monthly data collected over a full school year (All identifying information and scores are fictitious.)

  17. Strategic Monitoring: October (Jared Reed) (All identifying information and scores are fictitious.)

  18. 3 3 TIER 3: Progress Monitor Intensive monitoring of individualized goals for students at-risk of failure

  19. Progress Monitor (Tier 3):Intensive assessment with adjustable frequency that matches need 3 (All identifying information and scores are fictitious.)

  20. Benchmark(Tier 1):3x per year Strategic Monitoring (Tier 2):1x per month for select studentsat risk for educational difficulties Progress Monitor(Tier 3):Intensive assessment with adjustable frequency that matches need (All identifying information and scores are fictitious.)

More Related