1 / 24

Offshore wind turbine design Addressing uncertainty drivers

Sten Frandsen Niels Jacob Tarp-Johansen Erik Asp Hansen Michael Høgedal Lars Bo Ibsen Leo Jensen. Risø National Laboratory Risø National Laboratory DHI – Water and Environment Vestas Wind Systems Aalborg University ELSAM Engineering.

lena
Download Presentation

Offshore wind turbine design Addressing uncertainty drivers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sten Frandsen Niels Jacob Tarp-Johansen Erik Asp Hansen Michael Høgedal Lars Bo Ibsen Leo Jensen Risø National Laboratory Risø National Laboratory DHI – Water and Environment Vestas Wind Systems Aalborg University ELSAM Engineering Offshore wind turbine designAddressing uncertainty drivers

  2. Utilising experience from demonstration projects Objectives of work presented: To get the most out of the two Danish demonstration projects in terms of structural design

  3. North Sea:Horns Rev - monopile

  4. ….and Nysted: • Demonstration project in the Baltics • Concrete, gravity foundations ( km ) Nysted

  5. Design in general has many important sub-components like: Environmental protection Cabling Preparation and construction etc. – and: Structural loads, response and design loads For this project the target is design loads, extremes and fatigue: Measurements Wind and wakes Waves and current Soil conditions Response Synthesis of load cases Design components

  6. The design process Response integration

  7. COMPONENTS: Verification measurements Models Design calculations External conditions’ recording Atmospheric measurements, incl. wake measurements Wave measurements Geotechnical measurements FOCAL POINTS: Model verification measurements Interpretation of specific loads based on response measurements. Load response measurements Extremes from measurement. Metocean measurements Measurement of 2D/3D wave kinematics. Measurements of scour level. Wake measurements Conceptual – which characteristics of the wake affect the wake loading and how? Relationship between the wind turbine characteristics and flow characteristics Reference mean wind speed. Measurement of turbulence, wake width etc. to which the rotor is actually exposed. Measurements measurements wind and wakes waves and current soil conditions aero/hydro-response synthesis

  8. Measurements on offshore wind farms measurements wind and wakes waves and current soil conditions aero/hydro-response synthesis

  9. Instrumentation, Horns Rev Wind turbine Wind Waves measurements wind and wakes waves and current soil conditions aero/hydro-response synthesis

  10. COMPONENTS: External conditions Gusts, mean wind climate, turbulence, 50y extreme wind, shear, spectra, air density Wakes CT curves for stall and pitch-regulated wind turbines Turbulence as function of separation and wind speed Separation of effect of turbulence and mean deficit Discrete flow structures in wakes Rotor aerodynamics Adequacy of contemporary aero-codes FOCAL POINTS: Extreme gusts during normal operation CT curves vs. turbulence and velocity deficit Models for aerodynamic rotor loading Updating of models for extreme and fatigue loading Wind and wake-induced loads measurements wind and wakes waves and current soil conditions aero/hydro-response synthesis

  11. Extreme gust during normal operation measurements wind and wakes waves and current soil conditions aero/hydro-response synthesis

  12. COMPONENTS Determination of the sea states that shall be considered in design (wave height, period and direction, current, current direction, water level, etc.). Evaluation of combined undisturbed wave and current kinematics at the OWT position. Evaluation of the time varying loads from the kinematics. FOCAL POINTS Cases where the engineering models are sufficiently accurate and cases where more precise modelling is required. Determination of kinematics and time varying loads.. ..from steep waves superimposed on current, by use of a 3 dimensional Navier-Stokes solver, to be applied where simpler methods are not applicable. This action is parallel to attempts to derive approximate methods for implementation in aero-elastic codes. Contributions from loads on appurtenances. Determination of maximum run-up. Waves and current measurements wind and wakes waves and current soil conditions aero/hydro-response synthesis

  13. COMPONENTS Design drivers in general: Soil condition Water depth Possible erosion Size and type of wind turbine Environmental conditions (wave height, current, ice, etc.) Economics and politics FOCAL POINTS: Lateral pile resistance The ULS calculations for the piles are to be compared with an elasto-plastic finite element Analysis with the same soil conditions. Load-deflection curves (p-y curves): Performance of the p-y curves for pile diameters larger than 4 meters should be investigated. Curvature of the p-y curves in the pre-plastic portion is typically approximated by parabolic expressions. These approximations are not useful in the small-strain area. Behaviour of piles under cyclic loading. Soil conditions measurements wind and wakeswaves and currentsoil conditions aero/hydro-response synthesis

  14. COMPONENTS Effect of choice of structural modelling scheme on the response modelling, viz. e.g. finite-element method or modal formulation used for structural elements Aerodynamic and hydrodynamic load models’ ability to determine correctly the loading, based on proper input parameters representing the external conditions Foundation models ability to represent correctly the soil- structure interaction for both simple and more complex foundation types and the effect of the selected implementation scheme on the response modelling FOCAL POINTS Compare the response from simulations from different structural models on a generic turbine on a number of identical artificial test conditions Compare the response from different structural models with measurements of response and external parameters exist Feasibility of improving elements of the structural models Implement improvements and quantify reduced uncertainties by performing verification modelling Aero/hydro-elastic modelling measurements wind and wakeswaves and current soil conditions aero/hydro-response synthesis

  15. Handling and synthesis of response calculations • 1st edition of standard for design of offshore wind turbines IEC61400-3 is currently being issued in its final draft • Through a lengthy process the draft was created as an extension of the onshore standard • This implies, that relative to the onshore standard the number of load cases has increased substantially due to the addition of wave loads • In turn, also the composition of relevant load cases has become a more difficult task measurements wind and wakes waves and current soil conditions aero/hydro-responsesynthesis

  16. Load cases – who many do we need? measurements wind and wakes waves and current soil conditions aero/hydro-responsesynthesis

  17. Computational needswith present draft standard A complete set of simulations: 1000-1500 runs of each 10min duration measurements wind and wakes waves and current soil conditions aero/hydro-responsesynthesis

  18. Extreme load cases Normal operation Special load cases measurements wind and wakes waves and current soil conditions aero/hydro-responsesynthesis

  19. What – if anything – is less than perfect in IEC61400-3? • Not enough specific in terms of definition of loads and how to combine load cases • The extend of load cases may signal comprehensiveness, also in terms of accuracy • The many load cases in reality reflect uncertainty – “some extra load cases don’t hurt” • The instructions regarding how to perform site assessment are not sufficiently specific • Several components – viz. the descriptions given previously in this talk – may be improved • First and last – there are too many load cases. measurements wind and wakes waves and current soil conditions aero/hydro-responsesynthesis

  20. Suggested structure of design process Aim is to optimize structural design by • reducing uncertainty of component models • reducing uncertainty in load systhesis • rationalising load cases • tune load case synthesis Thus, main design components: • Site assessment • Dynamic analysis • Load cases and synthesis measurements wind and wakes waves and current soil conditions aero/hydro-responsesynthesis

  21. Site assessment • Measurements and hindcast • Joint probability density function (JPDF) • ways of estimating its uncertainty measurements wind and wakes waves and current soil conditions aero/hydro-responsesynthesis

  22. Dynamic analysis • Investigate the dynamic properties of the wind turbine • adequacy of aero/hydro elastic model • Identify possible peculiarities of design • This action should encompass special load cases • Investigate whether structure can be subdivided into components • Sensitivity analysis, including effect of joint-action of climate variables; theresponse function • is to be mapped for all relevant combinations of x measurements wind and wakes waves and current soil conditions aero/hydro-responsesynthesis

  23. Load cases and synthesis • Formal load cases should cover wt in operation • Derive conditional distributions on basis on prescribed random variability of response, conditioned on external conditions • Simulate without aero/hydro-elastic code to determine unconditional distribution • Derive equivalent load conditioned on external conditions Extreme response from Fatigue from measurements wind and wakes waves and current soil conditions aero/hydro-responsesynthesis

  24. Conclusion • Optimisation and decrease of uncertainty of the design of offshore wind turbines are sought • Therefore, a number of design-process components that contribute the most to the aggregated uncertainty has been identified • Considerations regarding handling of load cases and synthesis these have been presented

More Related