1 / 16

Self Assessment User’s G roup (SAUG) Self-Assessment & Benchmarking

Self Assessment User’s G roup (SAUG) Self-Assessment & Benchmarking . CAPOG Presentation Charlotte, SC August 2013 Alan Ettlinger - Entergy. SAUG. Self Assessment User’s Group. Continuous Improvement. Self Assessment User’s Group (SAUG ) Primary Objectives.

lela
Download Presentation

Self Assessment User’s G roup (SAUG) Self-Assessment & Benchmarking

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Self Assessment User’s Group (SAUG)Self-Assessment & Benchmarking CAPOG Presentation Charlotte, SC August 2013 Alan Ettlinger - Entergy SAUG Self Assessment User’s Group Continuous Improvement

  2. Self Assessment User’s Group (SAUG)Primary Objectives • Sharing information on SA/BM indicators/metrics, procedures and processes throughout the nuclear utility industry • Identifying industry best practices and maintains information to support SA/BM by SAUG members. • Establishing committees as needed to address specific issues, report findings, prepare technical papers, prepare guidance documents, and provide technical input to SA/BM industry processes and procedures. • Serving as a technical information resource to other organizations such as USNRC, EPRI & INPO • Providing a forum for SA/BM training development.

  3. Self Assessment User’s Group (SAUG)History • January 2012 – TVA, Chattanooga, TN • First meeting – Established the User’s Group • Defined SAUG Objectives/Mission • May 2012 – Exelon, Warrenville, IL • Establish Bylaws • Election of Officers • Form Sub Committees • January 2013, Luminant, Ft. Worth TX • Sub Committees Report Outs • INPO participation • August 2013, TVA, Chattanooga, TN • Final review of Metric White Paper • Roll out of SAUG website • INPO Participation • January 2013, Palo Verde, Phoenix

  4. Self Assessment User’s Group (SAUG)Steering Committee • Chair • Joe Carignan, TVA jecarignan@tva.gov • Vice Chair • Kevin Appel, Exelon Kevin kevin.appel@exeloncorp.com • At Large Members: • Alan Ettlinger, Entergy aettlin@entergy.com • Greg Thatcher, Luminant Gregory.Thatcher@luminant.com • Chuck Johnson, TVA ecjohnson@tva.gov

  5. Self Assessment User’s Group (SAUG)Subcommittees/Committee Chair • Initial Subcommittees • Metrics - Kevin Appel, Exelon • Training - Greg Thatcher, Luminant • SA Effectiveness – Phil Robinson • SARB – Alan Ettlinger , Entergy • Metrics Subcommittee presented results at August 5-6th Meeting in Chattanooga

  6. Self Assessment User’s Group (SAUG)Metrics Committee Members • Kevin Appel (Committee Chair) Exelon – Corporate/Fleet • Chadd Bliss Energy Northwest/Columbia • Melissa Brumbelow Constellation/Calvert Cliffs • Jonathan Grove Exelon/TMI • Michael Noland Dominion/Corporate • Susan Phillips Entergy/River Bend • Rachelle Reddick Southern Nuclear/Hatch

  7. Self Assessment User’s Group (SAUG)MetricsCommittee Charter/Mission Develop an industry standard of performance indicators to measure the health of the self-assessment and benchmarking programs. • Compare current performance to industry standards of excellence • Utilization of tools to detect and prompt intervention of issues at a low level before they become consequential.

  8. SummaryIndicator Categories & Supporting Indicators • Program Timeliness • Schedule & Report Adherence (on schedule/not on schedule) • Average Age of open SA/BM actions (includes formal & informal) • Program Use • Industry Peer Participation • # of SAs/BM completed • % of formal vs. total SA/BM conducted • Program Quality • Formal SA/BM Quality Review & Scoring (SARB) • # of SA/BM evaluating for Industry Excellence • Program Results / Effectiveness • # of identified SA deficiencies/BM enhancements • # of Effectiveness Reviews that are satisfactory Tier 1 Categories Tier 2 indicator

  9. Program Timeliness

  10. Program Use

  11. Program Quality

  12. Program Results/Effectiveness

  13. Results of Metrics Effort • Draft Guideline Presented at SAUG August 2013 Meeting • Self-Assessment & Benchmark Metrics-Performance Indicator 2012 Guidance “SAUG-G-2012-001” • Obtain concurrence from SAUG members & INPO • Issue Final Guideline Document for Industry Use

  14. Results from August SAUG Meeting Draft Self-Assessment & Benchmark Metrics-Performance Indicator 2012 Guidance Presented to Group INPO Supported Approach Panel Sessions on Mid Cycles, Self Assessments and Benchmarking New Subcommittees Established

  15. Next SAUG • Next SAUG Meeting – Hosted by Palo Verde • New Steering Committee Members will be elected • Move forward with Subcommittee’s on: • Effectiveness Reviews • Training • Website

  16. Questions??

More Related