1 / 7

Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI 2 )

Panorama High School. Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI 2 ). Math and Algebra 1 CST Proficiency Scores. Eddy Mata, Mathematics Instructional Coach. RtI 2 Problem Solving Process. Problem Identification. Problem Analysis. Evaluation. Intervention Design and Implementation.

leia
Download Presentation

Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI 2 )

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Panorama High School Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI2) Math and Algebra 1 CST Proficiency Scores Eddy Mata, Mathematics Instructional Coach

  2. RtI2Problem Solving Process Problem Identification Problem Analysis Evaluation Intervention Design and Implementation

  3. Step 1: Problem Identification • 2011 Math CST: 14% of PHS students scored Advanced or Proficient (1 point). • 2012 Math CST Target: 21% or more PHS students score Advanced or Proficient(2 points). • 2011 Algebra 1 CST: 7% of PHS Algebra 1 students scored Advanced or Proficient(1 point). • 2012 Algebra 1 CST Target: 15% or more of PHS students score Advanced or Proficient(2 point). Problem Identification

  4. Step 2: Problem Analysis • 238 of the 1661 PHS students(14%) taking Math in the 9th, 10th & 11th grade scored Advanced or Proficient on the 2011 Math CSTs • 50 of the 728 PHS students(7%) taking Algebra 1 in the 9th, 10th, & 11th grade scored Advanced or Proficient on the 2011 Math CSTs. • 80 Basic Math students are also taking Math Tutorial Lab classes. • Use CST data for analysis of Math Strands • Use Periodic Assessment Data to assess Course Standards 3 Problem Analysis

  5. Step 3: Intervention Design and ImplementationTier 1 • Course-alike Quizzes, Finals, Midterms, Chapter Tests and Review Sheets all based on CST format and question type • One full day of CST review will be allocated during each instructional week with a focus on the most assessed standards • CST-based Weekly Quizzes • Full period CST-review 2-weeks before testing • Use CST & Periodic Assessment Data to analyze student needs and adjust Curriculum and Instruction • Math Teachers will identify and conference with students who scored Below Basic on 2011 CST • Weekly Math Cohort Meetings 3 Intervention Design and Implementation

  6. Step 3: Intervention Design and ImplementationTier 2 • Math Tutorial Lab Classes(MTL) for Algebra 1 and Geometry • MTL will instruct on a limited number of key areas of need for our students • 2 days a week of full instructional review of CST topics during MTL • Full period 3-week CST-review before testing during MTL • 2-week after school CST tutoring offered by classroom teachers for their students • Curriculum adjustment and remediation based on math data 3 Intervention Design and Implementation

  7. Step 4: Evaluation • Periodic Assessments • Midterms • Finals • Course-alike Chapter Tests • Weekly Quizzes • Math Tutorial Lab Class Evaluation

More Related