The instrumental approach the institutional dimension
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 20

The instrumental approach: the institutional dimension PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 99 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

The instrumental approach: the institutional dimension. Michèle Artigue Université Paris 7. The origin of this approach.

Download Presentation

The instrumental approach: the institutional dimension

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


The instrumental approach the institutional dimension

The instrumental approach: the institutional dimension

Michèle Artigue

Université Paris 7


The origin of this approach

The origin of this approach

  • An institutional problem: the contrast between on the one hand, the number of institutional incentives, the richness of research and innovative work, the amazing development of ICT resources for mathematics education and, on the other hand, an educational integration which, globally, tended to remain rather marginal.

  • The desire to question usual explanations (material problems and teachers’ inertia) and to go beyond these.


The first insights

The first insights

  • Systems of values, issues of legitimacy

Scientific

legitimacy

Social

legitimacy

Educational

legitimacy

Technology seen as an educational tool at the service of « permanent » values


The lack of educational legitimacy and its resulting effects

The lack of educational legitimacy and its resulting effects

  • Emphasizing the potential and among its different possible facets, those linked with highest educational value: conceptual and strategic thinking, or with recurrent problems such as time constraints.

  • Minimizing the effects of the computer transposition of knowledge.

  • Developing a naturalistic vision of integration, and a naïve vision of teacher’s role..

  • Trying to seduce teachers by presenting them impressive situations without taking into account the didactic and technological expertise required for their management.


How to approach these problems

How to approach these problems?

  • A « natural » tool, given my specific culture: the anthropological approach.

  • But also some feeling that I needed something more, and a particular event: meeting with a book by Rabardel which had just came out.

  • Immediatly, the conviction that some coherent and operational tools for analysis could be built from the conjonction of these two approaches.


Some key points in the anthropological approach by chevallard

Some key points in the anthropological approach by Chevallard

The advance of knowledge goes along with the routinisation of tasks and techniques, the naturalization of knowledge

Praxeologies can be seen as complexes of tasks-techniques-technology-theory

Mathematical objects are nothing absolute; they arise from institutional practices : « praxeologies »

Knowing = ideoneity with institutional relationships


The anthropological approach

The anthropological approach

An approach leading to give some priority:

  • to the analysis of institutional norms and values;

  • to the interaction between the personal and institutional relationships to knowledge;

  • to the analysis of the computer transposition of knowledge and its possible effects;

  • to possible conflicts between norms and values, the way there are managed and their resulting effects;

  • to the new praxeologies induced by technological change, and their relationships with the ancient ones (both mathematics and didactic praxeologies).


The ergonomic approach

The ergonomic approach

From the artefact

To the instrument

Instrumental genesis

Instrumentalisation

Instrumentation

Schemes

Constraints

New potential


An implementation of this approach

An implementation of this approach

Understanding what knowledge about variation of functions can be approached and learnt in a CAS environment:

  • by building some engineering design;

  • by observing its life both at a personal and institutional levels through the collection of different types of data.


The personal dimension what results from the interview sessions

The personal dimension: what results from the interview sessions?

First interview : understanding the variations of f(x)=x(x+7)+9/x


The second step symbolic computations

The second step: symbolic computations

CAS gives you everything you need…


Then coming back to the graphic application

Then, coming back to the graphic application


Further verifications using tables and zooms

Further verifications using tables and zooms


The instrumental genesis of variation

The instrumental genesis of variation

  • From a personal point of view:

  • a slow progression from the graphic calculator culture towards the CAS culture.

  • an evident dependence of this progression on the evolution of students’ mathematical knowledge.

  • specific phenomena : zapping, over-verification strategies, explosion-reduction phases.

    How to explain such results ?

    Connecting the personal dimension with the institutional dimension


The ordinary life of techniques in their relationship with conceptualisation

The ordinary life of techniques in their relationship with conceptualisation

Solving new problems

Exploratory phase:

Craft work

Personal techniques

Development of

a « theoretical »

discourse

Selection, improvment,

institutionalisation

of some techniques

Routinisation and

investment in more

complex situations

Offical techniques


What changed with instrumented techniques

What changed with instrumented techniques?

During the first experimentation:

  • no official selection,

  • legitimation but not institutionalisation,

  • a « theoretical discourse » reserved to paper and pencil techniques

    Instrumented techniques remained private objects which were not officially worked out


Some specific difficulties

Some specific difficulties…

  • The diversity of commands and possible techniques

  • The mixture of computer and mathematics knowledge engaged in explanation and jusitications, including new mathematics knowledge

  • The problematic accessibility of technical knowledge

  • The distance with ordinary norms and values of mathematics teaching


The instrumental approach the institutional dimension

Revisiting the dialectics technical/ conceptual: the epistemic value of instrumented work and techniques

Standard environments

Step by step solving

Immediate results

Multiplicity of accessible results

CAS environments

Surprising results

New mathematical needs


Becoming aware of such constraints and difficulties the second experimentation

Becoming aware of such constraints and difficulties: the second experimentation

Some essential changes in the design:

  • Selection of commands and techniques

  • official work of institutionalisation and routinisation

  • management of the didactic contract taking into account its necessary evolution

    With evident positive effects


Some open questions

Some open questions

  • How to have such results influencing practice?

  • What is offered by this approach with respect to others dealing with the problems?

  • Where are the real complementarities?

  • Up to what point, the language of schemes and that of techniques can be made coherent when used simultaneously?


  • Login