Slide1 l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 40

IFRS, Convergence, and Change Richard Dinkel Controller, Koch Industries, Inc. Member of FASAC PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 241 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

IFRS, Convergence, and Change Richard Dinkel Controller, Koch Industries, Inc. Member of FASAC. Disclaimer. The views expressed in this presentation are my own and do not represent positions of the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council or the Financial Accounting Standards Board.

Download Presentation

IFRS, Convergence, and Change Richard Dinkel Controller, Koch Industries, Inc. Member of FASAC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Slide1 l.jpg

IFRS,

Convergence, and Change

Richard Dinkel

Controller, Koch Industries, Inc.

Member of FASAC


Disclaimer l.jpg

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this presentation are my own and do not represent positions of the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council or the Financial Accounting Standards Board.

Positions of the FASB are arrived at only after extensive due process and deliberation.


Ifrs timeline l.jpg

IFRS Timeline

  • 2007- SEC eliminates US GAAP reconciliation for IFRS filers

  • 2007- SEC concept release on use of IFRS for US registrants

  • 2008- SEC issues proposed “Roadmap” for adoption of IFRS in the US

  • 2010- SEC issues statement of continued support for convergence between US GAAP and IFRS


Convergence and improvement l.jpg

Convergence and Improvement

4

  • FASB and IASB working since 2002 to improve and converge U.S. GAAP and IFRS.

  • Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)

    • Identified 9 major accounting areas needing improvement in both U.S. GAAP and IFRS

    • Completed Business Combinations project in 2007 by issuing FAS 141(R) and 160, and IFRS 3

    • Remainder of projects still ongoing (slide 8)

    • In addition, just beginning joint deliberations on De-recognition Project.


Overall goal of convergence l.jpg

Overall Goal of Convergence

5

Improved, high-quality, converged standards developed through rigorous due process

Priorities:

Independence

Improvement

Convergence


Drivers for timing of convergence and improvement efforts l.jpg

Drivers for Timing of Convergence and Improvement Efforts

6

Financial Crisis underscored importance of global convergence of standards

G-20 has called for FASB/ IASB to “redouble their efforts” to complete their MoU projects by June 2011

SEC awaiting outcome of MoU projects before making decision about IFRS for U.S. public companies


Drivers for timing of convergence and improvement efforts7 l.jpg

Drivers for Timing of Convergence and Improvement Efforts

7

  • The June 2011 date also is being driven by the IASB because of:

    • Countries, including Brazil, Canada, India, and Korea, that have announced plans or intentions to adopt IFRS for their listed companies on or around 2011 or 2012

    • Terms ending for IASB chair Sir David Tweedie and two other IASB board members in mid-2011.


Current status of deliberations implications l.jpg

Current Status of Deliberations & Implications

8

  • Five major projects generally on track toward convergence:

    • Fair Value Measurement

    • Consolidations

    • Revenue Recognition

    • Financial Statement Presentation

    • Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Equity


Current status of deliberations implications9 l.jpg

Current Status of Deliberations & Implications

9

  • Three major projects not on track toward convergence:

    • Financial Instruments

    • Insurance

    • Leases

  • Further deliberations required

  • Target timelines for final standards could be in jeopardy


Fasb iasb project target dates l.jpg

FASB/IASB ProjectTarget Dates


Current status of deliberations implications11 l.jpg

Current Status of Deliberations & Implications

11

  • This intense level of standard setting is unprecedented

    • FASB has issued, at most, 4 major standards in one year

    • In addition, FASB has issued at one time no more than 3 exposure documents proposing significant changes

    • IASB has issued 9 major standards in its 9-year history.


Current status of deliberations implications12 l.jpg

Current Status of Deliberations & Implications

12

  • Volume and timing of MOU projects

    • Challenges ability of constituents to provide quality input to due process

      • Reactions from CFA Institute, FEI, ITAC and others: improvement is primary, speed is secondary.

    • Challenges preparers’ ability to implement final standards and users’ ability to analyze new financial reports

      • Joint Invitation to Comment to be issued by both Boards to seek input from constituents regarding effective dates and transition approaches


Convergence one final key point l.jpg

Convergence: One Final Key Point

13

  • If FASB/IASB achieve convergence on all of these major projects

    • U.S. GAAP and IFRS will not be completely converged.

      • Point raised in February 2010 SEC statement

    • Full IFRS adoption may still not happen

      • More urgent priorities

      • Costs of full adoption are high

      • Mixed support from regulators

      • Unresolved reporting issues

      • Convergence conflicts

      • Private company standards

    • How to stay converged??


Slide14 l.jpg

MoU Projects


Financial instruments l.jpg

Financial Instruments

15

  • Problems:

    • Complexities and inconsistencies within and between U.S. GAAP and IFRS, on:

      • Classification and measurement,

      • Impairment

      • Hedge accounting

    • In U.S., different impairment approaches for debt securities and loans especially problematic

    • Financial Crisis pointed to untimely recognition of credit impairment of loans held for collection by financial institutions


Financial instruments16 l.jpg

Financial Instruments

16

  • Proposed Solution:

    • Fewer/ simpler classification and measurement approaches

      • Two “buckets”: FV (mandatory for derivatives and trading instruments; default for other items) and FV/OCI (optional, based on business model, for other assets and liabilities, such as many loans and core deposits)

    • Fair value information on the balance sheet for most financial instruments

      • Exceptions: short-term trade receivables and payables; in certain circumstances, own debt

      • Amortized cost information also reported for FV/OCI items


Financial instruments17 l.jpg

Financial Instruments

17

  • Proposed Solution (cont’d):

    • Income statement puts non-credit-related FV changes of FV/OCI assets in OCI, rather than Net Income

      • Consistent with approach taken in FSP FAS 115-2 and 124-2

    • Improvements to impairment accounting, to develop single overall approach applicable to debt securities as well as loans

    • Simplified criterion to qualify for hedge accounting, leading to more consistent and transparent application


Financial instruments18 l.jpg

Financial Instruments

  • Companies Affected:

    • All; greater effect on financial institutions

  • Challenges to Convergence:

    • IASB currently has reached different conclusions in their proposed model, highlighted in table on following slide. We may or may not be able to reconcile these differences

    • While many users in the U.S. favor the more prominent display of FV information on the balance sheet, for loans, deposits, etc., banks and bank regulators generally oppose such change


Financial instruments19 l.jpg

Financial Instruments


Fair value measurement l.jpg

Fair Value Measurement

  • Problem:

    • US GAAP and IFRS not yet converged; FASB took the lead on improving this area a few years ago with Statement 157

      • Statement 157: how to, not when to, measure fair value

      • The IASB exposed Statement 157 with some fairly minor suggested modifications

      • Both FASB and IASB have since issued additional guidance in this area in response to Financial Crisis

  • Proposed Solution:

    • One global definition of fair value and approach to measurement and disclosure of fair value


Fair value measurement21 l.jpg

Fair Value Measurement

21

  • Companies Affected:

    • All, with greater effect on financial institutions; overall, will cause relatively insignificant changes when compared to current U.S. GAAP

  • Challenges to Convergence:

    • No significant differences regarding how to measure fair value

    • More significant differences relate to when to use fair value (see Financial Instruments Project)


Consolidations l.jpg

Consolidations

  • Problems:

    • Inconsistent guidance between U.S. GAAP and IFRS, especially on consolidation of variable interests (securitizations/ structured entities)

    • Consolidation requirements for voting interests may lead to non-economically-representative consolidation decisions, in certain situations:

      • Effective control rather than contractual control

      • Options, convertible instruments, agency relationships


Consolidations23 l.jpg

Consolidations

23

  • Proposed Solution:

    • Overall consolidation standard for both variable interest and voting interest entities identifying the party, if any, with power over and benefits from the key economic activities of the entity

    • Will result in fewer activities off-balance sheet

      • FASB already tightened de-recognition and consolidation guidance for variable interests (VIEs), through FAS 166 and 167, bringing it closer to IFRS and setting stage for convergence

  • Companies Affected:

    • All


Consolidations24 l.jpg

Consolidations

24

  • Challenges to Convergence:

    • Potential differences between Boards about how to evaluate effective control of voting interest entities (IASB: ability to control concept vs. FASB: ability to control with historical evidence view)

    • Banks fought recent changes to U.S. GAAP (SFAS 166 and 167), but bank regulators eased transition by phasing-in recognition for regulatory capital purposes


Revenue recognition l.jpg

Revenue Recognition

  • Problems:

    • U.S. GAAP: in 200+ standards (now codified), inconsistent, developed piecemeal

    • IFRS: very limited guidance, permitting “anything goes application” or need look to U.S. GAAP to apply IFRS

  • Proposed Solution:

    • Common principle, based on satisfaction of performance obligations, that can be applied consistently across various industries and transactions and better reflect the underlying economics of revenue transactions


Revenue recognition26 l.jpg

Revenue Recognition

26

  • Companies Affected:

    • All, but greatest effect on software and construction companies

  • Challenges to Convergence:

    • Nothing significant between the Boards


Financial statement presentation l.jpg

Financial Statement Presentation

  • Problem:

    • The ability of users to predict cash flows associated with a company would be enhanced greatly if the basic financial statements (balance sheet, income statement, cash flow statement) related to each other more cohesively and presented more disaggregated information

  • Proposed Solution:

    • A consistent format across statements, classifying items into business and financing categories, with a further disaggregation of business into operating and investing activities


Financial statement presentation28 l.jpg

Financial Statement Presentation

28

  • Proposed Solution (cont’d):

    • Required use of the direct method for presentation of operating cash flows

    • Disaggregation of reported items by function and nature to facilitate prediction of cash flows

      • Together all of these changes should help improve communication between preparers and users


Financial statement presentation29 l.jpg

Financial Statement Presentation


Financial statement presentation30 l.jpg

Financial Statement Presentation

30

  • Companies Affected:

    • All business entities (not-for-profit entities have been scoped out)

  • Challenges to Convergence:

    • Differences in approaches by Boards for disaggregating expenses by nature

      • FASB: in segment note

      • IASB: at consolidated level in notes, pending post-implementation review of IFRS 8

    • Preparers have expressed concerns about implementation costs, especially about direct method for presenting operating cash flows


Financial instruments with characteristics of equity l.jpg

Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Equity

  • Problem:

    • Inconsistent classification and measurement of hybrid financial liabilities with similar characteristics; vast rules-based literature (especially in U.S.) leading to structuring opportunities

  • Proposed Solution:

    • Replace complex inconsistent literature with one set of coherent classification requirements that define equity based on two principles

      • Ownership of the entity

      • Settlement with a specified number of ownership instruments


Financial instruments with characteristics of equity32 l.jpg

Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Equity

32

  • Companies Affected:

    • All companies

  • Challenges to Convergence:

    • Nothing significant between the Boards


Insurance l.jpg

Insurance

33

  • Problems:

    • Lack of a standard in IFRS for insurance contracts

    • U.S. guidance is unique and industry-specific

    • Industry practice of excessive deferrals of contract acquisition costs

  • Proposed Solution:

    • Common, high-quality standard for recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of insurance contracts, with contract acquisition costs expensed when occurred (similar to what is done for regulatory purposes)


Insurance34 l.jpg

Insurance

34

  • Companies Affected:

    • Insurance companies

  • Challenges to Convergence:

    • The Boards have tentatively reached different conclusions on numerous fundamental issues

      • Definition of insurance, measurement of liability, unbundling of contracts, accounting for acquisition costs and participating contracts

    • U.S. insurance industry generally has different views about the model than other major global insurers


Leases l.jpg

Leases

35

  • Problems:

    • Off-balance sheet presentation of leased assets and related financing

    • A bright-line distinction, especially in U.S. GAAP, between on- and off-balance sheet transactions, leading to structuring opportunities

  • Proposed Solution:

    • For lessees, lease obligations recognized on balance sheet as liabilities, along with a corresponding asset (using a “right to use” approach)


Leases36 l.jpg

Leases

36

  • Proposed Solution (cont’d):

    • Also looking at lessor accounting, to achieve consistency with model in Revenue Recognition Project

  • Companies Affected:

    • All; key industries affected include retailers, banks (branch offices), big equipment lessees (such as airlines and hospitals)


Leases37 l.jpg

Leases

37

  • Challenges to Convergence:

    • Differences between the Boards on approach to lessor accounting:

      • FASB: performance obligation approach, which recognizes revenue over lease term.

      • IASB: de-recognition approach that results in more up-front revenue

    • Leasing industry opposed to pattern of income recognition in lessee model and to performance obligation approach to lessor revenue recognition


Slide38 l.jpg

38

Conclusions


Conclusions l.jpg

Conclusions

39

Proposed changes are unprecedented

Politics may be impactful

Uncertainty still abound

FASB objectives are independence, improvement, and convergence—in that order

Thus, due process is crucial

Not too early to start planning


Slide40 l.jpg

40

Questions?


  • Login