1 / 12

L2 CAL Status

L2 CAL Status. Vadim Rusu. For the magnificent L2CAL team. The goal. MET+2 JETS. Improve the L2 MET resolution so that we can run at lower MET at L2 L1 only uses 8/10 bits No L2 calculation in the current system Change the jet clustering so that we can control the rates at high luminosity

leanne
Download Presentation

L2 CAL Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. L2 CAL Status Vadim Rusu For the magnificent L2CAL team

  2. The goal MET+2 JETS • Improve the L2 MET resolution so that we can run at lower MET at L2 • L1 only uses 8/10 bits • No L2 calculation in the current system • Change the jet clustering so that we can control the rates at high luminosity • Current L2 clustering – pacman style JET40 L2 CAL status

  3. The design L2CAL Cluster Finder Dcas L2 Decision Crate New Hardware Path L2 CPU L2 CPU L1CAL Dirac Board Muon/XTRP/L1/SVT/XCES Global L2 Decision Add new hardware to send the towers straight to the L2 PC Get new PC for better performance (about time anyway) Everything to be commissioned parasitically 8-bits 10-bits Energy/Tower Calorimeter L2 CAL status

  4. The project • An international mini-collaboration • Fermilab • Chicago • Madrid • Padova • Penn • Pisa • Purdue Started – Oct 2006 Completed - ASAP L2 CAL status

  5. The know-how TIMING GOAL ~ 20 us Pulsar Crate (6) Pulsar Crate (6) PC Pulsar Crate (6) • Use PULSARs as receivers for the LVDS data from DIRAC • Need to interface the 40 bit cables with the PULSAR • Build Mezzanine card • Serialize the data in Slink format • Receive on PC through Slink-PCI boards 6 slink outputs 96 LVDS cables 80 MhZ 96 LVDS cables 32-bit @ 40 MhZ Slink merger Pulsars (8) 6 slink outputs 32-bit @ 40 Mhz 80 MhZ 80 MhZ 40-bit word/cable @ CDF_clk (132 ns) 6 slink outputs Clustering timing ~ 10 us 80 MhZ Data transfer latency on average within ~10 us L2 CAL status

  6. The tool EM HAD EM HAD FPGA Altera L2 CAL mezzanine card 10bits x4 = 40 @ cdfclk (132ns) input data per cable Pulsar side LVDS Connector 40 JTAG 160 CMC Connectors to the pulsar Pulsar front panel L2 CAL status

  7. The tool • Built at UC in record time • Thanks Henry and e-shop • Tested and commissioned revision 1.0 over the holidays • Worked out of the box Ted makes good for the bet he lost. L2 CAL status

  8. The pieces • Mezzanine design • Laura • Testing/Checkout • Lucas, Miguel • Firmware • Marco, Laura • FER code • Massimo, Laura • Simulation package • Simone D., Gene F. • Monitoring • Giorgio + Simone P., Michael – Wojtek/Carla – consulting • PC infrastructure and algo • Gene + Kristian Hahn – consultant • PC interface • Anadi • Preparing the celebrations (parties, happy hours, etc…) • myself L2 CAL status

  9. The status • Boards – arrive over the month of February • Mezzanine, Slink, AUX (Henry – UC) • Front panels and strain relief (Richard – UC) • Pulsars (Paola – Pisa) • Cables – 80% in hand • Cable map (thanks JDL) • Software – final testings • Firmware – stage 1 ready to go L2 CAL status

  10. The plan • Start splitting the cables one DCAS crate at a time starting next week • Have half the DCAS system split and parasitically running by the end of February • March have all system running parasitically • April – new trigger tables • May – Project completed • 10 bit MET resolution • New Jet algorithm (cone based) L2 CAL status

  11. The future • The L2 CAL trigger will be a very versatile system • What the new L2CAL will provide: • 10 bit MET at L2 • Better L2 jet position • L2 jet closer to offline jets • What else? • Angular correlations (jets, MET) • Track jet matching • Dijet mass • New paradigm: Your offline analysis code can be implemented in the trigger • Use the L2 CAL simulation to do studies that will improve the trigger selection • Already starting on this in the context of HTTF L2 CAL status

  12. THE END L2 CAL status

More Related