1 / 11

Between Global and Local: Eight European Works Councils in Retrospect and Prospect

Between Global and Local: Eight European Works Councils in Retrospect and Prospect. Tony Huzzard and Peter Docherty 2005. Authors. Tony Huzzard : Associate Professor at University of Lund in Sweden Research Fellow, National Institute for Working Life, Stockholm, Sweden

leanne
Download Presentation

Between Global and Local: Eight European Works Councils in Retrospect and Prospect

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Between Global and Local: Eight European Works Councils in Retrospect and Prospect Tony Huzzard and Peter Docherty 2005

  2. Authors • Tony Huzzard: • Associate Professor at University of Lund in Sweden • Research Fellow, National Institute for Working Life, Stockholm, Sweden • Strategic Unionism and Partnership: Boxing or Dancing? • Peter Docherty • Senior Research Fellow, National Institute for Working Life, Stockholm, Sweden • Senior Research Fellow, Institute for the Management of Information and Technology, Chalmers University of Technology

  3. What is a European Works Council? • 1994 EU directive • Organization representing workers • For companies with at least 1000 employees • Forum for informing and consulting employees • Employee representation on national basis • Formally limited to international issues

  4. Types of EWCs • Symbolic EWCs: largely disfunctional bodies that are passive and satisfy the minimal requirements of the Directive • Service-Oriented EWCs: bodies facilitating management processes that entail mutual information exchange but stop short of genuine negotiation • Project-oriented EWCs: employee representative that have independent agendas and objectives on specific issues • Participative EWCs: autonomous worker voices impacting on decision-making through negotiation and genuine consultation

  5. Swedish Based EWCs • Sweden already has high union participation (80%) • Many EWCs of Swedish companies have more foreign members than Swedish members due to international organization of company. • Greater impact on international employees than on Swedish employees

  6. EWC Impacts and Outcomes • So far, only an arena for information and exchange – many want more corporate interaction • Information received from EWCs, while not perfect does contribute to better understanding of the company’s situation • Information often given after already decided upon

  7. Consultation and Negotiation Within EWCs • Very little consultation or negotiation between EWCs and Swedish companies • Companies often use EWCs simply as a vehicle to deliver news to employees • EWC members often feel that despite conversation about issues, the decisions have already been made

  8. Discussion • EWCs often used as forum for domestic issues • Data give no evidence that discussion at EWC level has altered any corporate decisions • Southern European EWC representatives seek to develop much more participative model • Swedish employees resist this move toward participative structure of EWC

  9. Conclusion • EWCs have served to broaden corporate culture • International network of employee information • Country of origin (Sweden in our case) is central influence in EWC despite international representation • Swedish EWCs likely to move beyond symbolic, but unlikely to become participatory

  10. My Thoughts • EWCs seem to be good for businesses as they are in Sweden • Provide management with simple avenue to deliver information to employees • Currently retain corporate influence

  11. Questions?

More Related