More effective donor cooperation to fight rural poverty and hunger
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 12

More effective donor cooperation to fight rural poverty and hunger PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 80 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

More effective donor cooperation to fight rural poverty and hunger Canadian International Development Agency, Ottawa February 3-6, 2008. The Global Donor Platform on Rural Development (GDPRD). Is a strategic alliance

Download Presentation

More effective donor cooperation to fight rural poverty and hunger

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


More effective donor cooperation to fight rural poverty and hunger

Canadian International Development Agency, Ottawa

February 3-6, 2008


The Global Donor Platform on Rural Development (GDPRD)

  • Is a strategic alliance

  • Includes like-minded donors, development agencies and international finance institutions, all of which agreed to establish the Platform to increase aid effectiveness (AE) in agriculture and rural development (ARD) efforts.

  • Acts as a mechanism for greater development assistance impact through its three main pillars:

    • Advocacy and outreach

    • Knowledge and innovation

    • Aid effectiveness


FAO

BMZ

EC

CIDA

DFID

WB

Organization and Governance

29 members at present

(bi- and multilateral)

  • Board/Steering Committee

  • is the decision-making body (6 members)

  • The Platform Secretariat is hosted by the German Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ)

DGDC

IA

UNODC


Civil Society and Aid Effectiveness in Agriculture and Rural Development

A summary of country consultations

Mushtaq Ahmed


Background

  • Consultations from Nov 2007 – Jan 2008

  • 13 countries, 600 participants

    • 250 CSOs

    • 50 government ministries

    • 30 donor organizations

  • Three outcomes


Findings

  • Outcome 1: Recognition and voice

    • Need for greater recognition and voice for CSOs in ARD – special challenges of the sector

  • Outcome 2: Applying and enriching the AE agenda

    • Low awareness among CSOs about PD, AE

    • CSOs acknowledge need to strengthen AE

    • Limited capacity and challenges to overcome in the rural setting

    • Consultations did raise awareness


Findings

  • Outcome 3: Improved understanding of good practice

    • Collaboration with community is strong but needs more inclusive consultation processes

    • Collaboration with other CSOs at times hindered by competition, poor leadership

    • Collaboration with governments requires clarification of roles and openness to dialogue collaborate


Findings (cont’d)

  • Outcome 3 (cont’d)

    • North-South CSO collaboration needs more consultation and mutual appreciation of respective roles between partners

    • Relations with donors are mainly donor/recipient or CSOs are seen as implementing agencies; CSOs often more accountable to donors than to community; not enough engagement with smaller ARD CSOs


A focus on good practice

  • Policy dialogue: legal protection for Andean producers

  • Influence of national policies: free trade and food security in Peru

  • Exploiting market failures – Mozambique

  • Strategic network building – fish sanctuaries in Bangladesh

  • Innovative approaches – Egypt canal project


Recommendations: some highlights

  • Southern CSOs – should be consulted, strengthen networks and promote AE

  • Northern CSOs – should strengthen attitude of mutual respect, ensure full participation of community


Recommendations: some highlights (cont’d)

  • Governments – should provide enabling environment

  • Donors – should involve CSOs in project/policy design, monitoring; support adequate voice for CSOs; provide flexible funding; promote participatory processes; support work of smaller local CSOs


Conclusions

  • CSOs play major role in AE in ARD:

    • Development agents/implementing agencies

    • Promoting member participation

    • Empowering specific social groups

    • Defining the rights of citizens

    • Monitoring the use of public resources

  • The nature of ARD in itself exacerbates the challenges faced by CSOs


  • Login