1 / 38

Privacy by Design (PbD) Confessions of an Architect

Privacy by Design (PbD) Confessions of an Architect. Privacy by Design | Time to Take Control Toronto, Canada January 28th, 2011 Jeff Jonas, IBM Distinguished Engineer Chief Scientist, IBM Entity Analytics JeffJonas@us.ibm.com. Background.

lea
Download Presentation

Privacy by Design (PbD) Confessions of an Architect

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Privacy by Design (PbD)Confessions of an Architect Privacy by Design | Time to Take Control Toronto, Canada January 28th, 2011 Jeff Jonas, IBM Distinguished Engineer Chief Scientist, IBM Entity Analytics JeffJonas@us.ibm.com

  2. Background • Early 80’s: Founded Systems Research & Development (SRD), a custom software consultancy • 1989 – 2003: Built numerous systems for Las Vegas casinos including a technology known as Non-Obvious Relationship Awareness (NORA) • 2005: IBM acquires SRD, now chief scientist of IBM Entity Analytics • Personally architected, designed and deployed +/- 100 systems, a number of which contained multi-billions of transactions describing 100’s of millions of entities • Selected Affiliations: • EPIC, Member, Advisory Board • Privacy International, Member, Advisory Board • Markle Foundation, Member, Task Force on National Security in the Information Age • Senior Associate, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)

  3. A Late Bloomer to Privacy 1980 – 2001 No clue whatsoever 2001 – 2006 Slowly waking up 2007 – 2011 Today, at best, a student of privacy

  4. The greater the number of imperfections appear in the rearview mirror A Journey Fraught with Reflection and Rethinking The greater my privacy and civil liberties awareness

  5. Katrina – Missing Persons Reunification Project • Information about status of persons quickly end up scattered across countless databases • Over 50 such web sites/organizations were identified as having victim related data • Many people were registered duplicate times in the same database • Many people were registered duplicate times across databases • Many people were registered as missing in one database and found in another database • Connecting found persons previously reported as missing becomes nearly impossible • Too many databases • Constantly changing data

  6. Katrina Reunification Project Statistics • Total data sources 15 • Usable records 1,570,000 • Unique persons 36,815 • Total loved ones reunited >100

  7. Katrina – Missing Persons Reunification Project • Privacy by Design • Contractually authorized to delete all the data after the reunification office completed its work • Hence, a few months later, all collected data and reporting products were deleted DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE! Data Decommissioning – Destruction of Accountability

  8. “G2”My Skunk Works Project

  9. G2: Sensemaking on Streams 1) Evaluate new information against previous information … as it arrives. 2) Determine if what is being observing is relevant. 3) Deliver this relevant, actionable insight fast enough to do something about it … as it’s happening. 4) Do this with sufficient accuracy and scale to really matter.

  10. From Pixels to Pictures to Insight Relevance Contextualization Observations Consumer (An analyst, a system, the sensor itself, etc.) Information in Context

  11. G2: Sensemaking on Streams • Domain: People, organizations, places, things, events … proteins, asteroids, and more. • Will simultaneously commingle and make sense over structured, unstructured, biographic, biometric and geospatial data • Multi-lingual • Even curious: If it is unsure, it figures if it is worth researching and may choose to ask Google or maybe even Jeopardy champion to clear up any confusion

  12. Harnessing Big Data. New Physics. • More data: better the predictions • More data: bad data … good • More data: less compute

  13. Smarter Planet: Example G2 Use Cases • Traffic optimization • Route suggestions pushed to drivers, just-in-time, to avert significant traffic events • Optimize individual lives • Search results optimized based on predictions about where you are going next • Pandemic response • A nation able to work right through an extreme global pandemic with real-time citizen recommendations (e.g., “quarantine yourself!”)

  14. THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PRESENTATION IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. ALTHOUGH EFFORTS WERE MADE TO VERIFY THE COMPLETENESS AND ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PRESENTATION, IT IS PROVIDED “AS IS”, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. IN ADDITION, THIS INFORMATION IS BASED ON IBM’S CURRENT PRODUCT PLANS AND STRATEGY, WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY IBM WITHOUT NOTICE. IBM SHALL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF, OR OTHERWISE RELATED TO, THIS PRESENTATION OR ANY OTHER DOCUMENTATION. NOTHING CONTAINED IN THIS PRESENTATION IS INTENDED TO, OR SHALL HAVE THE EFFECT OF CREATING ANY WARRANTY OR REPRESENTATION FROM IBM (OR ITS AFFILIATES OR ITS OR THEIR SUPPLIERS AND/OR LICENSORS); OR ALTERING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE APPLICABLE LICENSE AGREEMENT GOVERNING THE USE OF IBM SOFTWARE.

  15. IBM InfoSphere SensemakingV1.1.0.0 Following two years of skunk works development while guided by privacy by design goals … it is just possible that there are more privacy and civil liberties enhancing capabilities baked-in, during conception and design, than any other general purpose advanced analytics technology commercially available … on Earth … to date.

  16. PbD: Full Attribution ABOUT THE FEATURE • Every record knows where it came from and when • No merge/purge data survivorship processing IMPORTANCE • Universal Declaration of Human Rights has four articles containing the word “arbitrary” e.g., Article 9 reads “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.” If you don’t know where the data came from, how can this be non-arbitrary? • The ability to identify every original record is essential for reconciliation and audit

  17. PbD: Data Tethering ABOUT THE FEATURE • Adds, changes and deletes from source systems can be processed • Real-time, sub-second (not requiring periodic batch reloading) IMPORTANCE • Data currency in information sharing environments is important e.g., when derogatory data in error is corrected in a source system, it is vital such corrections are corrected everywhere, immediately

  18. PbD: Analytics on Anonymized Data ABOUT THE FEATURE • Owners of data can anonymize selected fields before an information transfer • Despite the cryptographic form of the data, deep predictive analytics (including some fuzzy matching) can still be accomplished when fusing this data for discovery and analysis IMPORTANCE • With every copy of data, there is an increased risk of unintended disclosure • Data anonymized before transfer and anonymized at rest reduces the risk of unintended disclosure • And with full attribution, re-identification is by design to ensure reconciliation and audit

  19. PbD: Tamper Resistant Audit Logs ABOUT THE FEATURE • Who searches for what is logged in a consistent manner • Even the database administrator cannot alter the evidence contained in this log IMPORTANCE • Every now and then people with access and privileges take a look at records without a legitimate business purpose, e.g., an employee of a banking system looking up their neighbor • Tamper resistant logs make it possible to audit user behavior and can cause chilling-effects on misuse

  20. Patrick T Smith 340-900-9000 Patricia Smith 340-900-9000 EXISTING BEST PRACTICE ? ? Pat T Smith 340-900-9000 Student Patrick T Smith 340-900-9000 Patricia Smith 340-900-9000 Pat T Smith 340-900-9000 Student 3 1 3 2 1 2 Closest. Hence, for sure PbD: False Negative Favoring Methods

  21. PbD: False Negative Favoring Methods ABOUT THE FEATURE • A false negative occurs when something that is true is not detected • Sometimes a new record can belong to two different entities • Usually systems select the strongest of the two • But had there been only one choice, it would have matched to the other • This is now properly handled, in real-time IMPORTANCE • If a new record gets arbitrarily assigned, you may have inadvertently created a false positive • False positives can adversely effect peoples lives – e.g., the police find themselves knocking down the wrong door or an innocent passenger is denied the ability to board a plane

  22. Patrick T Smith 340-900-9000 Patricia Smith 340-900-9000 ? ? Pat T Smith 340-900-9000 Student 1 2 2 1 3 3 PbD: False Negative Favoring Methods NEW BEST PRACTICE Patrick T Smith 340-900-9000 Patricia Smith 340-900-9000 100% 100% Pat T Smith 340-900-9000 Student

  23. A plausible claim these two people are the same John T Smith Jr 123 Main Street 703 111-2000 DOB: 03/12/1984 John T Smith Sr 123 Main Street 703 111-2000 DL: 009900991 John T Smith 123 Main Street 703 111-2000 DL: 009900991 Until this record comes into view 1 2 3 Which reveals this is a FALSE POSITIVE PbD: Self-Correcting False Positives

  24. 1 3 2 2 PbD: Self-Correcting False Positives John T Smith Jr 123 Main Street 703 111-2000 DOB: 03/12/1984 John T Smith Sr 123 Main Street 703 111-2000 DL: 009900991 John T Smith 123 Main Street 703 111-2000 DL: 009900991 John T Smith 123 Main Street 703 111-2000 DL: 009900991 New Best Practice: FIXED IN REAL-TIME (not end of month)

  25. PbD: Self-Correcting False Positives ABOUT THE FEATURE • A false positive is an assertion (claim) that is made, but not true • With every new data point presented, all prior assertions are re-evaluated to ensure they are still correct, and if now incorrect, these are repaired • If two people were thought to be the same because they share the same name, address and phone – then later it is discovered this is a JR and SR (two different people), this is now remedied • In real-time, not end of month IMPORTANCE • False positives can adversely effect peoples lives • Without self-correcting false positives, databases start to drift from the truth and become visibly wrong – necessitating periodic reloading to fix this • Periodic monthly reloading would mean wrong decisions are possible all month until the next reload, even though you knew beforehand

  26. PbD: Information Transfer Accounting Basic Data Name: Mark T Smith Address: POB 1346 City: Seattle Phone: (310) 555-0000 Tax ID: 556-99-9999 Balance: $361.43

  27. PbD: Information Transfer Accounting Who Looked Date Name Why 01/09/2010 Ken Wales Teller trans 11/24/2010 Susan Callie Fraud invest

  28. PbD: Information Transfer Accounting Sent Where Date Sent to Why 04/19/2010 ADP Payroll synch 06/01/2010 Amex Marketing alliance 07/16/2010 S&J Inc Third party deal 12/31/2010 IRS Annual compliance

  29. PbD: Information Transfer Accounting ABOUT THE FEATURE • Can record who inspected each record and record this with the record, mush like a credit report has a list of recent parties who have inquired • Can record what records were transferred to secondary systems, allowing users to inspect information flows IMPORTANCE • It is often cumbersome to learn who has seen what records or what records have been shared system-to-system • Users can now be easily provided such disclosures increasing transparency and control e.g., able to recall or cancel information transfers from selected sharing partners

  30. A Wide Number of Privacy by Design Features By design Data Tethering Analytics on Anonymized Data Tamper Resistant Audit Log Information Transfer Accounting Full Attribution False Negative Favoring Self-Correcting False Positives By design By design By design Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory

  31. & More Responsible Smarter IBM InfoSphere SensemakingV1.1.0.0

  32. IBM InfoSphere SensemakingV1.1.0.0ChallengeTry to find another general purpose advanced analytics technology with more privacy and civil liberties enhancing features baked-in by design! In this competition everyone wins.

  33. And more likeminded, nifty features to come …

  34. IBM InfoSphere SensemakingV1.1.0.0Date of availability: January 28th, 2011 (TODAY!)~~ Caveat: Limited availability, subject to lab approval ~~

  35. Related Reference Material Big Data. New Physics. Decommissioning Data: Destruction of Accountability Source Attribution, Don’t Leave Home Without It Data Tethering: Managing the Echo Out-bound Record-level Accountability in Information Sharing Systems To Anonymize or Not Anonymize, That is the Question Immutable Audit Logs (IAL’s) Big Data Flows vs. Wicked Leaks

  36. Privacy-Enhancing Technology, State of the Union • Yesterday: Stand-alone privacy-enhancing technologies • Exist • If cost extra, adoption is low and slow • Some researchers wander off – placing attention elsewhere • Today: Privacy by Design • Baked in • No additional cost • Some privacy and civil liberties enhancing functionality can even be embedded without an off switch

  37. Finally … Privacy by design is more than just technology. Equal, if not more attention, must be placed on privacy by design when conceiving process and policy.

  38. Privacy by Design (PbD)Confessions of an Architect Privacy by Design | Time to Take Control Toronto, Canada January 28th, 2011 Jeff Jonas, IBM Distinguished Engineer Chief Scientist, IBM Entity Analytics JeffJonas@us.ibm.com

More Related