1 / 26

SALTO missions highlights and SALTO collaboration site

SALTO missions highlights and SALTO collaboration site. Robert Krivanek – R.Krivanek@iaea.org Project manager for LTO Division of Nuclear Installation Safety. SALTO Highlights 2005-2015. SALTO Highlights 2005-2015 was published in 2016.

lcasteel
Download Presentation

SALTO missions highlights and SALTO collaboration site

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SALTO missions highlights and SALTO collaboration site Robert Krivanek – R.Krivanek@iaea.org Project manager for LTO Division of Nuclear Installation Safety

  2. SALTO Highlights 2005-2015 SALTO Highlights 2005-2015 was published in 2016. >Analysed results of missions held until June 2015: 5 pilot SALTO missions, 13 SALTO missions (No.9-11, 13-22) and 2 OSART missions with LTO modules. > Also analysed results of follow-up missions; 6 SALTO follow-up missions and 2 OSART follow-up missions with LTO modules. SALTO Highlights 2015-2018 is just prepared following the analysis method of SALTO Highlights 2005-2015.

  3. SALTO Highlights 2015-2018 SALTO Highlights 2018 analyses results of: > missions in the period of July 2015 – June 2018: 14 SALTO missions (No.23 - 36) 9 OSART missions with LTO modules > follow-up missions in the period of July 2015 – June 2018: 4 SALTO follow-up missions 1 OSART follow-up mission with LTO module

  4. SALTO missionsanalysed (2015/7 - 2016/12)

  5. SALTO missionsanalysed (2017/1 - 2018/6)

  6. LTO modules of OSART missionsanalysed

  7. Findings Overview (1) <SALTO Highlights 2015-2018> <SALTO Highlights 2005-2015>

  8. Findings Overview (2) Trends observed based on Highlights 2015-2018 and Highlights 2005-2015: • More SALTO missions in 2015-2018 than in 2007-2015 – 14+9* vs. 13+2* • More issues from 2015-2018 missions than from 2007-2015 missions – 221 vs. 208 • Trend: This shows intensive activity in this area with high demand from Member States. • - Number of issues per mission per area is decreasing (2015-2018 vs. 2005-2015): • Area A: total 42 > 38, per mission 1.83 < 2.53 • Area B: total 48 > 38, per mission 2.09 < 2.53 • Area C: total 37 < 53, per mission 1.61 < 3.53 • Area D: total 40 > 29, per mission 1.74 < 1.93 • Area E: total 29 < 32, per mission 1.26 < 2.13 • Area F: total 25 > 8, per mission 2.08 > 1.6 • Trend: This shows better understanding of IAEA Safety Standards and better preparedness for SALTO missions (with exception of area F). • *SALTO + OSART with LTO module

  9. Area A 2015-2018 results analysis Organization and functions, current licensing basis, configuration/modification management • In some plants (4-10 out of 23 plants): • - Exiting organization is not adequate for supporting LTO. (7/23) • - The content of the LTO implementation programmeis not complete. (6/23) • - Design basis documentation is not adequately managed to ensure its availability for the plant. (6/23) • - Periodic Safety Review is not comprehensive. (5/23) • - Documents developed to provide requirements and guidance for LTO do not cover all aspects. (4/23) • In a few plants (1-3 out of 23 plants): • - Regulatory expectations for safe LTO are not clear for the plant. (3/23) • - Organization for support LTO is not fully established. (3/23) etc.

  10. Area B 2015-2018 results analysis Scoping and screening, plant programmes relevant to LTO • In many plants (11-20 out of 23 plants): • - Insufficient coordination of existingplant programmeswith ageing management (11/23) • In some plants (4-10 out of 23 plants): • - Insufficient evaluation of effectiveness of existing plant programmes (7/23) • - Incomplete scope of SSCs for ageing management and LTO assessment (7/23) • - Incomplete documentation on process/ results on scope setting (4/23) • In a few plants (1-3 out of 23 plants): • - The methodology for scope setting is not established (3/23) • - The methodology for scope setting is not consistently used for LTO (3/23) • - Ageing of the active and short lived SCs is not properly managed (3/23)

  11. Area C 2015-2018 results analysis AMR, review of AMPs and revalidation of TLAAs for mechanical components • In many plants (11-20 out of 23 plants): • - AMR of mechanical SCs for LTO is not adequately performed (e.g., gaps in condition assessment, identification of potential ageing effects, identification of relevant programmes to manage ageing, documentation). (12/23) • In some plants (4-10 out of 23 plants): • - Revalidation of TLAAs for mechanical SCs is not complete or adequate. (7/23) • - AMPs for mechanical SCs are not adequately developed or implemented (e.g., gaps in identification of managed ageing effects, trending, acceptance criteria, corrective actions, documentation). (6/23) • - Identification of TLAAs for mechanical SCs is not complete or systematic. (5/23)

  12. Area D 2015-2018 results analysis AMR, review of AMPs and revalidation of TLAAs for electrical and I&C components • In some plants (4-10 out of 23 plants): • - The EQ (particularly environmental qualification) programme is not comprehensive. (9/23) • - A proactive programme for managing technological obsolescence is not developed/ fully established. (7/23) • - The scope of electrical and I&C SSCs for LTO components is not properly implemented. (5/23) • - AMR for electrical and I&C SCs for LTO is not adequately performed (e.g., gaps in condition assessment, identification of potential ageing effects, identification of relevant programmes to manage ageing, documentation). (6/23) • - AMPs for electrical and I&C SCs are not adequately developed or implemented (e.g., gaps in identification of managed ageing effects, trending, acceptance criteria, corrective actions, documentation). (4/23) etc.

  13. Area E 2015-2018 results analysis AMR, review of AMPs and revalidation of TLAAs for civil structures • In many plants (11-20 out of 23 plants): • - AMR for civil SCs for LTO is not adequately performed (e.g., gaps in condition assessment, identification of potential ageing effects, identification of relevant programmes to manage ageing, documentation). (13/23) • In some plants (4-10 out of 23 plants): • - AMPs for civil SCs are not adequately developed or implemented (e.g., gaps in identification of managed ageing effects, trending, acceptance criteria, corrective actions, documentation). (10/23) • - Identification and revalidation of TLAAs for civil SCs is not complete or adequate. (5/23)

  14. Area F 2015-2018 results analysis Human resources, competence and knowledge management for LTO • In many plants (6-10 out of 12 plants): • - Human resources policy and strategy to support LTO is not adequate or not fully developed. (10/12) • - Knowledge management or knowledge transfer processes for LTO are not adequate or fully implemented. (9/12) • - Competence management is not adequate or fully implemented. (6/12)

  15. Cross-cutting issues In order to grasp trends easily, classification by broader categories reviewed in more than one review area was conducted: • Trends: • Number of issues belonging to Top 4 categories is almost same (app. 15%). • A least one issue is raised for every core topic (scope setting, AMR, AMP and TLAA) during every SALTO mission. • Issues on SALTO missions core topics (scope setting, AMR, AMP and TLAA - categories 2,3,4,6) account for app. 55%.

  16. Most frequent topics of issues The tables below show the results of analysis of other than core topic issues: Area A - E : 14 SALTO missions Area F: 12 SALTO missions • Trend: These tables show common issues in other than core topics in many plants, some with frequency of more than 80%, such as: • Knowledge management; • Equipment / Environmental Qualification; • Human resources /staffing.

  17. Resolution of issues at follow-up missions SALTO Highlights 2015-2018: 4 SALTO FU and 1 OSART FU SALTO Highlights 2005-2015 : 6 SALTO FU and 2 OSART FU • Trend: Due to significant delays in implementation of LTO programmes in several NPPs, mostly due to political decisions in those countries and reorganization in utilities, share of: • ‘Resolved’ has decreased from 48% to 32%; • ‘Insufficient progress’ has increased from 5% to 14%. • .

  18. The SALTO collaboration site In order to share information related to SALTO peer review, Just now developed, mainly for: - SALTO mission reviewers and observers, and - Host peer and counterparts of missions. SALMIR DB is here. Useful links are here

  19. Registration Process to access restricted information The restricted information are stored on ‘SALTO collaboration site’, which can be accessed only by registered users. The registration is done in two steps. 1. GNSSN system registration [same as IGALL restricted area registration] The user has to obtain an ID and password. This is done in the part of the Nucleus platform. The  registration system confirms online that an ID and password have been assigned and in addition sends a notification via email. 2. SALTO collaboration site registration In the second step the user requests a registration to the SALTO collaboration site on GNSSN website by sending an email to designated administrator including following information: Nucleus User Name, Mail address used to registration for Nucleus The registration request is reviewed by the IAEA staff. (SALTO support officer) The user receives a notification of the approval or the rejection of the registration via email within a few days. If you hope to access the SALTO collaboration site, please contact the officer below. Gabor PETOFI (Operational Safety Section/IAEA) Email : g.petofi@iaea.org Phone : +43(1)2600-22633

  20. 1. GNSSN system registration from https://www.iaea.org/ Click ‘RESOURCES’ and ‘NUCLEUS’

  21. 1. GNSSN system registration (continued) Click here

  22. 1. GNSSN system registration (continued) Register on ‘NUCLEUS’

  23. Registration page on ‘NUCLEUS’ 1. GNSSN system registration (continued)

  24. Registration will be completed immediately after sending registration form.

  25. 2.Request the access to the SALTO site by e-mail Add address g.petofi@iaea.org Write to subject “Registration request to access to SALTO collaboration site” Provide necessary information After receiving this email, the administrator will begin the process of opening the access, and notify the user by email once it’s completed. Once registered, you can access to the SALTO site. https://gnssn.iaea.org/sites/auth/NSNI/ExtPRJ/SALTO/SitePages/Home.aspx

  26. Thank you for the attention!

More Related