State of play ntbs in nama
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 27

State of Play: NTBs in NAMA PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 41 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

State of Play: NTBs in NAMA. Workshop for African Group Countries: WTO NAMA Negotiations on NTBs 12-14 April 2010. Sanitary and phytosanitary Technical barriers to trade PSI and other formalities Price control or price-related measures Licenses, quotas, prohibitions

Download Presentation

State of Play: NTBs in NAMA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


State of play ntbs in nama

State of Play: NTBs in NAMA

Workshop for African Group Countries: WTO NAMA Negotiations on NTBs

12-14 April 2010


A broad range of interventions

Sanitary and phytosanitary

Technical barriers to trade

PSI and other formalities

Price control or price-related measures

Licenses, quotas, prohibitions

Charges, taxes, para-tariffs

Finance measures

Anti-competitive measures

Trade-related investment measures

Distribution restrictions

Restrictions on post-service sales

Subsidies

Procurement restrictions

A broad range of interventions


Definitions two challenges

Definitions: Two Challenges

NTBs are defined negatively: Any measure with a trade effect that is not a tariff

Challenge 1 - design and content:

  • Legitimate public policy

  • Legitimate public policy spiced with protection

  • Protection

    Challenge 2 – application of measures

  • Efficient, least cost administration of public policy

  • Excessive dead-weight costs, inefficient or deliberately cost-augmenting administration


Nama ntbs sequence of main events

NAMA – NTBs: Sequence of main events

2002/2003→ Generic proposals by Participants

Apr. 2003→ Overview of neg. proposals submitted, NTBs

Jan. 2003→1st Notification exercise

Aug. 2003→ Chair’s Draft Elements for Modalities, including NTBs

Oct. 2003→2nd Notification exercise

2004/2005→ Review and classification of notifications Where should the notified NTBs be negotiated?

(Continues…)


State of play ntbs in nama

2005 → Hong Kong:

bilateral, vertical and horizontal approaches

NTBs are being addressed in other for a, including negotiating groups

Need for specific negotiating proposals

2006/07→ 13 vertical and horizontal proposals were submitted by Participants (almost half are TBT related). Bilateral requests were also made (TN/MA/NTR/ series )

2008→ Should NTB negotiations finish with the modalities or subsequently? If the latter, then how?(TN/MA/W/103/Rev.3 P. 23-26)

2009→ Intensive technical work on the proposals (Q&A process);

Two new proposals have been received

NAMA – NTBs: Sequence of main events (cont.)


Nama ntbs inventory 2 nd exercise what type of measures were notified

NAMA NTBs Inventory (2nd exercise)What type of measures were notified?


Nama ntbs inventory 2 nd exercise which sectors faced the most measures

NAMA NTBs Inventory (2nd exercise)Which sectors faced the most measures?


Nama ntbs inventory 2 nd exercise where would the member concerned like to solve the issue

NAMA NTBs Inventory (2nd exercise)Where would the Member concerned like to solve the issue?

Each Member to decide where to

tackle the NTBs of its interest


December 2008 text tn ma w 103 rev 3 core elements

December 2008 text (TN/MA/W/103/Rev.3)Core Elements

  • Text based negotiations should continue on proposals after modalities are established. Seven “merit particular attention”

  • Aim is to finalize discussions on proposals as early as possible for their inclusion in any final package in NAMA

  • Members should pay attention to any systemic or cross-cutting issues, including those relating to the TBT Agreement, that may arise from these proposals

  • Negotiations on bilateral requests should proceed in tandem. Need to multilateralize the outcomes through inter alia incorporating them where appropriate into Part III of the schedules


State of play ntbs in nama

Horizontal Mechanism – African Group, Canada, EU, LDCs, NAMA-11, NZ, Norway, Pakistan, CH

1


State of play ntbs in nama

Chemicals – Argentina

2


State of play ntbs in nama

Fireworks - China

3


State of play ntbs in nama

Lighters - China

4


State of play ntbs in nama

Elimination of unilateral NTBS - Cuba

5


State of play ntbs in nama

Electronics – EU and Switzerland

6


State of play ntbs in nama

Export taxes - EU

7


State of play ntbs in nama

Textiles, Clothing, Footwear and Travel Goods – EU, Mauritius, Sri Lanka, US

8


State of play ntbs in nama

Export Licensing – Japan, Chinese Taipei and US

9


State of play ntbs in nama

Forestry Products in Building Construction – New Zealand

10


State of play ntbs in nama

Electronic Goods - US

11


State of play ntbs in nama

Remanufactured Goods – Japan, Switzerland, United States

12


State of play ntbs in nama

Automotive Products - US

13


State of play ntbs in nama

Automotive Products - EU

14


State of play ntbs in nama

Industry-specific NTB Proposals – EU, India

15


Summary cross cutting

Summary: Cross-Cutting

  • Horizontal proposal

  • Cuba’s generic proposal

  • Export-related policies

  • Framework for industry-specific proposals


Summary sector specific

Summary: Sector-Specific

  • Chemicals

  • Fireworks

  • Lighters

  • Remanufactured goods

  • Electronics

  • Textiles, clothing, footwear, leather goods

  • Forestry products

  • Automotive products


Some objectives underlying sector specific proposals

Some Objectives Underlying Sector-Specific Proposals

  • Internationalization of standards

  • Common standards

  • Streamlining of standards-related procedures

  • Greater recognition of national procedures

  • Avoiding duplication

  • Willingness to consult

  • Guaranteeing transparency

  • Technical assistance


  • Login