Evaluation of progressive distillation l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 67

EVALUATION OF PROGRESSIVE DISTILLATION PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 83 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

EVALUATION OF PROGRESSIVE DISTILLATION . Dan Dobesh – Jesse Sandlin Dr. Miguel Bagajewicz 04.29.2008. This presentation is not about this Insurance Company. Not about this one either… . Our Mission.

Download Presentation

EVALUATION OF PROGRESSIVE DISTILLATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Evaluation of progressive distillation l.jpg

EVALUATION OF PROGRESSIVE DISTILLATION

Dan Dobesh – Jesse Sandlin

Dr. Miguel Bagajewicz

04.29.2008


Slide2 l.jpg

This presentation is not about this Insurance Company


Slide3 l.jpg

Not about this one either…


Our mission l.jpg

Our Mission

“Analyze progressive crude fractionation, a technology patented in 1987 that claims to be more energy efficient than conventional fractionaltion.”


Punchline l.jpg

Punchline

“Progressive Distillation can reduce the heat duty requirement of the distillation process by 17% for a heavy crude, and use 16% less furnace heat utility while producing more valuable products for a light crude.”


Overview l.jpg

Overview

  • Background:

    • Distillation Specifications

    • Conventional Crude Distillation

    • Progressive Crude Distillation

  • Methodology

  • Results

  • Accuracy & Limitations


Petroleum value chain l.jpg

Petroleum Value Chain

Petroleum Refining

Petroleum Products

Petroleum Production

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_refinery

www.freddiesasphaltoval.com/

Fuels

Solvents

Lubricants

Plastics

Detergents

Nylon

Polyesters

http://www.lakewoodconferences.com/direct/dbimage/50241031/Plastic_Toy.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Oil_well.jpg

www.ehow.com/how_2041839_siphon-gas-car.html


Oil refinery schematic l.jpg

Oil Refinery Schematic

Over 2% of the energy content in a crude stream is used in distillation.*

Distillation accounts for about 40% of energy use in a refinery.**

Diagram Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_refinery

* Bagajewicz, Miguel and Ji, Shuncheng. “Rigorous Procedure for the Design of Conventional Atmospheric

Crude Fractionation Units. Part I: Targeting.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 617-626

**Haynes, V.O. “Energy Use in Petroleum Refineries.” ORNL/TM-5433, Oak Ridge NationalLaboratory, Tennessee, September (1976).


Overview9 l.jpg

Overview

  • Background:

    • Distillation Specifications

    • Conventional Crude Distillation

    • Progressive Crude Distillation

  • Methodology

  • Results

  • Accuracy & Limitations


Light crude feed l.jpg

Light Crude Feed

  • Petroleum crude component boiling points range from -161 C (CH3) to over 827 C (C40H82+)


Heavy crude feed l.jpg

Heavy Crude Feed

  • Petroleum crude component boiling points range from -161 C (CH3) to over 827 C (C40H82+)


Astm d86 07b d86 point l.jpg

ASTM D86-07b, “D86 Point”

  • American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM): international organization that is a source for technical standards

  • Rigorously developed method for quantitatively testing the boiling range of a petroleum product

(1) Oil sample heated in glass flask using electric heater

(2) Vapor is condensed and collected

(3) Temperature versus amount collected is recorded

  • Not applicable to products containing large amounts of residual


Product specifications l.jpg

ProductSpecifications

Generated from Pro/II Computer Model

This graph compares the boiling point range of the five products


D86 5 point heavy component l.jpg

Product Gaps Explanation

D86 5% point heavy component

- D86 95% point light component

390⁰ C

- 360⁰ C = 30⁰ C

D86 95% point light component

D86 5% point heavy component

Positive gaps indicate more distinct separation.


Overview15 l.jpg

Overview

  • Background:

    • Distillation Specifications

    • Conventional Crude Distillation

    • Progressive Crude Distillation

  • Methodology

  • Results

  • Accuracy & Limitations


Conventional distillation l.jpg

Conventional Distillation


Conventional distillation simulation l.jpg

Conventional Distillation Simulation


Gaps conventional distillation l.jpg

Gaps – Conventional Distillation

D86 95% point anchors products on the right side, gaps change the left side


Conventional indirect l.jpg

Conventional = Indirect

Takes the heaviest component as the bottom product in each column. Lighter components are sent to the next column.

Source: Smith, Robin, Chemical Process Design


Conventional indirect20 l.jpg

Conventional = Indirect

Stacking these columns on top of each other is essentially conventional distillation.

Bagajewicz, Miguel and Ji, Shuncheng. “Rigorous Procedure for the Design of Conventional Atmospheric

Crude Fractionation Units. Part I: Targeting.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 617-626


Conventional indirect21 l.jpg

Conventional = Indirect

Stacking these columns on top of each other is essentially conventional distillation.

Stacked columns from the indirect sequence.

Bagajewicz, Miguel and Ji, Shuncheng. “Rigorous Procedure for the Design of Conventional Atmospheric

Crude Fractionation Units. Part I: Targeting.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 617-626


Overview22 l.jpg

Overview

  • Background:

    • Distillation Specifications

    • Conventional Crude Distillation

    • Progressive Crude Distillation

  • Methodology

  • Results

  • Accuracy & Limitations


Patent process for distillation of petroleum by progressive separations l.jpg

Patent: Process for Distillation of Petroleum by Progressive Separations

  • This is an expired patent for crude fractionation that is now being commercialized by Technip.

  • Main idea is to heat components only as much as necessary.

  • Several companies are excited by this concept that promises large energy savings.

  • A new refinery is being built in central Germany using this concept.


Progressive crude distillation patent l.jpg

Progressive Crude Distillation Patent


Progressive crude distillation patent25 l.jpg

Progressive Crude Distillation Patent


Technip s progressive brochure l.jpg

Technip’s Progressive Brochure


Technip s progressive brochure27 l.jpg

Technip’s Progressive Brochure


Technip s progressive brochure28 l.jpg

Technip’s Progressive Brochure


Progressive crude distillation gaps l.jpg

Progressive Crude Distillation - Gaps


Gaps progressive distillation l.jpg

Gaps – Progressive Distillation

Light Crude


Progressive direct l.jpg

Progressive = Direct

Takes the lightest component as the top product in each column. Heavier components are sent to the next column.

Source: Smith, Robin, Chemical Process Design


Conventional vs progressive l.jpg

Conventional vs. Progressive

Summary

One main column

Many columns

Direct

Indirect

Recover heavy components first

Recover light components first


Overview33 l.jpg

Overview

  • Background:

    • Distillation Specifications

    • Conventional Crude Distillation

    • Progressive Crude Distillation

  • Methodology

  • Results

  • Accuracy & Limitations


Simulation development method l.jpg

Simulation Development Method

  • Build PRO/II progressive crude simulation

  • Obtain correct D86 95% points

  • Synchronize product gaps

  • Mimimize heat duty

  • Compare to conventional heat duty

  • Determine areas for improvement


Simulation assumptions l.jpg

Simulation Assumptions

  • SRK is a valid thermodynamic model for hydrocarbon systems

  • Pseudocomponents represent crude composition

  • PRO/II provides a close representation of reality


Basis of comparison l.jpg

Basis of Comparison

PRO/II Conventional Simulation, 260 ⁰C steam


Pro ii computer model s l.jpg

PRO/II Computer Model(s)

Progressive Model – 4 column direct

Furnace heat duty = 89 MW

This is higher than 58.7 MW for conventional distillation

Previous work suggested that this setup provided no furnace heat utility benefit over conventional distillation. Our results verify this.


Initial complex simulation l.jpg

Initial Complex Simulation

  • Unnecessarily complicated

Too many products for conventional comparison


Pro ii computer model l.jpg

PRO/II Computer Model

Patent

Vacuum distillation for residual product is not important for comparison


Second type simulation l.jpg

Second Type Simulation

  • Too much furnace heat utility: 200+ MW

Each column has a reboiler


Third type simulation l.jpg

Third Type Simulation

  • Furnace utility is lower, but steam utility his very high

All seven columns have steam input


Heating supply demand l.jpg

Heating Supply-Demand

F*Cp MW

Temperature ⁰C

  • Demand Curve – dark line showing heat needed by system

  • Supply boxes – heat utility able to be recovered from system

  • Heat can be transferred down and left by second law

  • Heat can only move right across pinch via a pumparound


Final type simulation l.jpg

Final Type Simulation

Replaced steam with reboilers in the first series of columns


Heating supply demand44 l.jpg

Heating Supply-Demand

F*Cp MW

Temperature ⁰C


Specifications l.jpg

Specifications


Variables l.jpg

Variables


Controller variable systems l.jpg

Controller-Variable Systems

  • Naphtha-kerosene gap varies with steam flowrate in Column 1

  • Kerosene-diesel gap varies with steam flowrate in Column 2

  • Diesel-gas oil gap varies withsteamflowrate in Column 3

  • D86 95% points are obtained by varying the condenser duty

Column 2

Column 1

Column 3


Slide48 l.jpg

days…

MONTHS

weeks

After hours of red simulations and Red Bulls…

After hours of red simulations and Red Bulls…

After hours of red simulations and Red Bulls…

After hours of red simulations and Red Bulls…

Happy hour


Final simulations l.jpg

Final Simulations

  • Conventional: four simulations

    • 260 ⁰C steam, 135 ⁰C steam

    • Heavy feed, light feed

  • Progressive: eight simulations

    • Reboilers, steam

    • 260 ⁰C steam, 135 ⁰C steam

    • Heavy feed, light feed

    • High heat exchanger temperatures, low heat exchanger temperatures


Overview50 l.jpg

Overview

  • Background:

    • Distillation Specifications

    • Conventional Crude Distillation

    • Progressive Crude Distillation

  • Methodology

  • Results

  • Accuracy & Limitations


Conventional vs progressive51 l.jpg

Conventional vs. Progressive

Light Crude

9% Decrease

15% Decrease


Slide52 l.jpg

Light Crude


Progressive heat usage l.jpg

Progressive Heat usage

Light crude heat utility diagram

Hot Utility

Cold Utility

The intersection that is unaccounted for is the cold and hot utility


Progressive heat usage55 l.jpg

Progressive Heat usage

Light Crude

F*Cp MW

Temperature ⁰C


Conventional vs progressive56 l.jpg

Conventional vs. Progressive

Heavy Crude

9% Decrease

14% Decrease


Progressive heat usage59 l.jpg

Progressive Heat usage

Heavy crude heat utility diagram


Progressive heat usage60 l.jpg

Progressive Heat usage

Heavy Crude

F*Cp MW

Temperature ⁰C


Our conclusion l.jpg

Our Conclusion

“Progressive Distillation can reduce the heat duty requirement of the distillation process by at least 17% for a light crude, and at least 16% for a heavy crude, while producing similar amounts of products.”


Economic analysis l.jpg

Economic Analysis

  • 120,000 BPD plant

  • Gross profit = Product sales – Utility costs

  • Progressive provides gross profit increase of $10.2 million each year using light crude feed and $27.3 million each year using a heavy crude feed


Vacuum economic analysis l.jpg

Vacuum Economic Analysis

  • Gas oil and residue profits are recovered in equal amounts in both cases

  • Progressive provides gross profit increase of $25.7 million each year using light crude feed and $57.2 million each year using a heavy crude feed


Overview64 l.jpg

Overview

  • Background:

    • Distillation Specifications

    • Conventional Crude Distillation

    • Progressive Crude Distillation

  • Methodology

  • Results

  • Accuracy & Limitations


Limitations l.jpg

Limitations

  • Different column sequences and setups may offer lower heat utility

  • Optimum setup is based on composition of crude feed

  • Simulations are a simplification of reality

  • Heat exchanger network in the simulation is not optimized


Accuracy l.jpg

Accuracy

  • D86 95% point comparisons between conventional and progressive are within 0.1 degrees Celcius

  • Product gap comparisons between conventional and progressive are within 1.0 degrees Celcius

  • Flowrate comparisons between conventional and progressive are within 10 cubic meters per hour


Questions l.jpg

Questions


  • Login