Loading in 5 sec....

Transfer Function for Separation DipolesPowerPoint Presentation

Transfer Function for Separation Dipoles

- 63 Views
- Uploaded on

Download Presentation
## PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Transfer Function for Separation Dipoles' - lawrencia-benedict

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Transfer Function for Separation Dipoles

Frank Zimmermann

LHCCWG 12.07.2006

Discussions with O. Bruning, S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi

the problem

D1-D2 transfer function errors can have a significant effect on closed orbit during squeeze (10 units → 3s orbit change at triplet)

local correction requires careful analysis and distinction between

- D1/D2 transfer function errors
- Triplet alignment errors
- Triplet gradient errors with crossing-angle bump offsets

[O. Bruning, Chamonix XII]

D2

D2

D1

D1

separate

BPM

common BPMs

separate

BPM

BPM distances to IP: 21.35, 31.53, 58.32, 151.14 m

original procedure

- triplet alignment optics with low-b quads off to define straight line with 6 or 8 BPMs;
- k-modulation of individual Q1, Q2 or Q3 magnets to find offsets w.r.t. to reference line from BPMs
- differences in the lines for beam1 and beam2 indicates D1/D2 transfer line error
- after correcting D1/D2 powering error obtain reference line for triplet alignment

[O. Bruning, Chamonix XII]

LHC triplet alignment optics

[A. Verdier, LHC PN 325, 2003]

requires about half the nominal emittance for aperture reasons;

x&y tunes lower by 1 unit, if IR1 & 5 both use this optics

- correct incoming beam upstream of D2 for zero offset and angle
- adjust D1 on one side to steer beam on 0-slope trajectory through the IP
- then look at other side
- and/or adjust D1 and D2 together to get both beams on the same orbit?

S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, F.Z.

problems

- low-b quads: misalignment of mechanical & magnetic axes 0.1-0.2 mm in x, 0.5 mm in y; beam needs to be steered through the mechanical center!
- BPM offsets may cause error of up to 5 mrad (?), compared with total deflection angle of 1.5 mrad; this is larger than desired precision of 3x10-4
- BPMs might have different offsets for beam1 and beam2 (?)

S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, F.Z.

questions

- in which aspect is the D1/D2 transfer function effect any different from other closed-orbit errors of the two beams, and why does it need to be treated differently?
- do we want to measure transfer functions with beam at 450 GeV and at 7 TeV?
- do we want to use alignment optics?; if yes, with which beam and which BPM resolution?

- alignment optics at injection to define straight reference line for both beams (BPM readings)
- K-modulation to measure quad misalignments and align where necessary
- apply 2-beam orbit correction across IR region; include D1 and D2 as additional correctors

Download Presentation

Connecting to Server..