html5-img
1 / 11

A Welfare Approach to Mitigating Environmental Injustice: Exploring Needs of Pollution Victims

A Welfare Approach to Mitigating Environmental Injustice: Exploring Needs of Pollution Victims. Tsuey-Ping Lee Associate Professor Department of Political Science National Chung-Cheng University Taiwan, R.O.C. Overview of the Study.

lavina
Download Presentation

A Welfare Approach to Mitigating Environmental Injustice: Exploring Needs of Pollution Victims

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Welfare Approach to Mitigating Environmental Injustice: Exploring Needs of Pollution Victims Tsuey-Ping Lee Associate Professor Department of Political Science National Chung-Cheng University Taiwan, R.O.C.

  2. Overview of the Study • Purpose: To explore the social welfare needs of residents residing environmentally polluted areas. • Results: • Poverty is a serious issue for some residents. • Maximizing current human resources and cultivating future manpower may reduce community poverty. • Lack knowledge regarding the pollution problem.

  3. Background--the An-Shun Plant 1942 Established by Kanegafuchi Soda 1945 Taken over by Taiwan’s government Taiwan Alkali Industrial Corp (TAIC)-State Owned 1960s Started to produce PCP related products. 1970s Became Asia’s biggest producer of DDT. 1982 Shut down by the government 1983 Merged into CPDC (State-owned) 1994 CPDC privatized

  4. Background--Pollution Produced • Major pollutants: Pentachlorophenol, Dioxin, and Mercury • Bottom mud in Luermen River is seriously polluted. • Dioxin level of fishes caught from nearby reservoir is high. • Blood dioxin level of residents is high. • Death rate caused by cancer is much higher than national average.

  5. Framework for Analysis • Economic status of the household • Household consumption and expenditures • Gifts and remittances sent or received • Needs for human resource development • Current human resources • Future manpower • Needs for social contingency prevention and aftercare • satisfaction with health care services • comprehension about the pollution

  6. Method • Personal Interview Questionnaire • Sample size: 301 (95% confidence level, 5% confidence interval) • Systematic sampling • March and April 2008. • Cronbach’s Alpha: 0.87

  7. Results-- Demographic Profile • Old age • Low education level • Low income level

  8. Summary -- Economic Status • 51.2% insufficient in consuming food. • 49.8% insufficient in consuming non-durable goods. • 70.8% insufficient in purchasing services. • 84.4% insufficient in consuming durable goods. • Residents incapable to meet subsistence level did not necessarily obtained help from others.

  9. Summary--Human Resources • Current Human Resources • Unemployment issue • Aging is a serious issue in the community. • Future Manpower • Residents’ wishing for their children to leave will make aging problem even worse. • Residents’ ignorance of mental damage of children and youth.

  10. Summary--Contingency Prevention and Aftercare • Information and Knowledge regarding pollution in the community are not completely prevailed. • Quite a few residents are not satisfied with the health services provided specifically for them.

  11. Conclusion • Residents’ needs are multi-dimensional. • Poverty is a serious issue for some residents. • Maximizing current human resources and cultivating future manpower may reduce community poverty. • Lack knowledge regarding the pollution problem. • Short term vs. long term prescriptions

More Related