Workshop for New Foundation Board Members
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 33

Workshop for New Foundation Board Members AGB Foundation Leadership Forum Terranea Resort, Los Angeles, CA January 26, 2014 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 274 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Workshop for New Foundation Board Members AGB Foundation Leadership Forum Terranea Resort, Los Angeles, CA January 26, 2014. Presenters. Carol Cartwright Former president Kent State University and Bowling Green State University and AGB Consultant [email protected] David Bass

Download Presentation

Workshop for New Foundation Board Members AGB Foundation Leadership Forum Terranea Resort, Los Angeles, CA January 26, 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Workshop for new foundation board members agb foundation leadership forum terranea resort los angeles ca january 26 2014

Workshop for New Foundation Board MembersAGB Foundation Leadership ForumTerranea Resort, Los Angeles, CAJanuary 26, 2014


Presenters

Presenters

Carol Cartwright

Former president Kent State University and Bowling Green State University and AGB Consultant

[email protected]

David Bass

Director, Foundation Programs and Research, AGB

[email protected] (202) 776-0850


Agenda

Agenda

  • Current Contexts

  • Principles

  • Foundations’ Role in Supporting Public Higher Education

  • Responsibilities of Foundation Boards

  • Foundation Roles in Fundraising

  • Structure, Staffing, and Funding

  • Effective Foundation-Institution Partnerships


About agb

About AGB

The Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges is the only national association that serves the interests and needs of academic governing boards, boards of institutionally related foundations, and campus CEOs and other senior-level campus administrators on issues related to higher education governance and leadership.  Its mission is to strengthen, protect, and advocate on behalf of citizen trusteeship that supports and advances higher education.

  • AGB has more than 1.250 member institutions including colleges, universities, and affiliated foundation

  • Serve board members, presidents, and CEOs, senior administrators, and board professionals


Current contexts

Current Contexts

  • Public institutions are being held to heightened standards of accountability and governing boards are focusing increased attention on financial oversight and risk management

  • Increased needs for private support are leading many institutions to explore changes to the structure of their development programs and, in many cases, look to their foundation to play a more active role in fundraising and assume responsibility for real estate projects

  • Foundation boards’ obligation to ensure intergenerational equity has become increasingly challenging

  • Velocity of Leadership Transitions and competition for development and investment talent


Why have a foundation practical

Why Have a Foundation?--Practical

  • Separation of privately contributed resources from state funds

  • Facilitation of institutional objectives that would be impossible, impractical, or simply inefficient for state agents such as real estate acquisition and development, debt financed projects, entrepreneurial ventures and partnerships

  • Provision of dedicated stewardship and management of privately contributed resources

  • Safeguarding of donor privacy


Why have a foundation strategic

Why Have a Foundation? -- Strategic

  • Philanthropic leadership (leadership gifts, prospect identification, cultivation, and solicitation, campaign leadership)

  • Engagement of volunteers with specialized expertise (investment management, real property, etc.)

  • Stewardship—Focus on compliance with donor intent

  • Advocacy and advisory roles

  • Continuity of leadership


A different type of board

A Different Type of Board

Public Institution Boards

Foundation Boards

Every institution can have its own foundation

Self perpetuating

Recruited from dedicated supporters

Apolitical

Narrowly focused on fundraising, management of contributed funds

Long-serving

  • Institutions that are part of a system may not have a separate board

  • Appointed by governor or legislature (or elected)

  • Composition limited

  • Political

  • Broad range of responsibilities

  • Terms of service limited


The value of volunteers

“Foundations turn outsiders into insiders”

Stature and relationships with community/business leaders

Philanthropic leadership

Compelling advocates

Technical and professional expertise

Long-term perspective and visionary thinking

Continuity of leadership

The Value of Volunteers


Workshop for new foundation board members agb foundation leadership forum terranea resort los angeles ca january 26 2014

Giving to Higher Education 1975 - 2010


Workshop for new foundation board members agb foundation leadership forum terranea resort los angeles ca january 26 2014

Growth of Public Higher Ed Fundraising


Public institution fundraising

Public Institution Fundraising

Prior to the 1970s most public institutions had neither the ability nor the need to seek significant private support.

In the past 4 decades public higher education fundraising has grown exponentially -- volunteer-led foundations have, in addition to their stewardship role, emerged as drivers of public higher-education fundraising.

1990: 39% of $8.2 billion

2000: 43% of $19.4 billion

2010: 48% of $23.5 billion


Fundamental principles

Fundamental Principles

  • The Duty of Care requires full attention to one’s duties as trustee, setting aside competing personal or professional interests insofar as possible

  • The Duty of Obedience refers to trustees’ obligation to promote the mission of the organization within legal limits

  • The Duty of Loyalty requires board members to put the interests of the trust before all others

  • The Duty to Serve the Public Interest in accordance with the foundation’s status as a publicly supported charity


Principles for foundation boards

Principles for Foundation Boards

  • Absolute clarity regarding the roles, responsibilities, and obligations of the institution and affiliated entities

  • The foundation board is responsible for prudent management and stewardship of privately contributed resources and may play an important advisory role but does not determine institutional priorities

  • The foundation is a philanthropic partner; assets are generally donor restricted. It is not an ATM.

  • Trust of constituents depends on complete fiduciary accountability


Commitment to accountability and transparency

Commitment to Accountability and Transparency

  • Commitment to accountability should be guiding principle for all parties

  • Affiliated entities should comply with the highest standards of transparency commensurate with the safeguarding of donor privacy or sensitive confidential business information

  • Trust, but verify. Ask uncomfortable questions

  • Apply the smell test, newspaper test, and vampire test

  • Avoid conflicts of interest


Responsibilities of foundation boards i

Responsibilities of Foundation Boards I

  • Maintain the foundation’s fiscal integrity, preserve and protect its assets and provide financial oversight

  • Ensure that the work of the foundation is aligned with the strategic priorities of the host institution

  • Work with the chief executive on the foundation’s long-term strategic plan, and participate in, approve, and monitor progress of the foundation’s plan


Responsibilities of foundation boards ii

Responsibilities of Foundation Boards II

  • Engage directly in fundraising, and provide diligent stewardship of philanthropic contributions

  • Advocate for the institution in keeping with its public purpose and the state’s or county’s public agenda

  • Support the foundation chief executive and provide oversight as appropriate, given the position’s reporting relationships

  • Conduct the board’s business in an exemplary fashion and periodically assess the performance of the board, its committees, and its members


Expectations of foundation board members i

Expectations of Foundation Board Members I

  • Articulate and support the foundation’s mission and purpose

  • Develop a thorough knowledge of the institution’s mission, strategic priorities, challenges, and opportunities

  • Understand and respect the distinct roles of the foundation and institution boards

  • Accept the fiduciary responsibilities of foundation board members and adhere to foundation policies and practices

  • Scrupulously avoid conflicts of interest and adhere to foundation policy


Expectations of foundation board members ii

Expectations of Foundation Board Members II

  • Prepare for and participate conscientiously in board and committee meetings, and other foundation activities

  • Exercise independent judgment, ask good questions, and willingly share your time and expertise

  • Work collaboratively with the foundation chief executive, other board members, and institution leaders

  • Advocate for the foundation and the host institution at every opportunity

  •  Set an example by personal giving and active participation in the fund-raising process


Foundations role in fundraising 4 year 2 year

Foundations’ Role in Fundraising (4-Year/2-Year)

  • 34% / 43% are wholly responsible for fundraising for their institutions

  • 10% / 31% direct fundraising with support from institution staff

  • 44% / 23% support fundraising that is directed by institution staff

  • 8% / 2% play little or no role

  • 2015: 27% report that some responsibility for some development functions has been transferred from the institution to the foundation in past 5 years


Boards participation in fundraising

Boards’ Participation in Fundraising

  • Foundation Boards’ contribute an average of 14% of total support raised by public institutions

  • Foundation board members contributed 21% of funds raised during the quiet phase of campaigns vs. 4% contributed by governing board members

  • 88% of foundation boards participate in the cultivation and solicitation of gifts, 80% in campaign leadership

  • 2014: 54% report that board has become more active in fundraising leadership in the past 5 years.

    AGB: 2010


Advocacy

Advocacy

Greater numbers of foundation board members now advocate on behalf of the institution with legislators

  • 1995 AGB Foundation Survey: 42.7% serve as advocates

  • 2011 AGB Policies, Practices and Composition of Foundation Boards: 65.9% serve as advocates

  • 2015 AGB Poll: 57% report that the foundation board has assumed greater importance as an ambassador and advocate since 2010


Other changes in foundation roles since 2010

Other Changes in Foundation Roles since 2010

  • 42% Foundation board has assumed increased responsibility for real property projects and/or other entrepreneurial ventures

  • 32% Foundation board is more actively engaged in an advisory capacity to institution administrators

  • 27% Responsibility for some development functions has been transferred from the institution to the foundation

  • 14% Responsibility for some development functions has been transferred from the foundation to the institution

  • 14% No major changes in foundation role in the last 5 years


Operational independence

Operational Independence

Is operational independence important?

  • Changed legal context and public climate

  • Some functional independence can enhance accountability

  • May be important to safeguard donor privacy and strategic business information

  • May be necessary to preserve ability to operate as a private (non-state) entity

  • Foundations with the capacity to self-fund can fire-wall development investment and enhance staff recruitment and retention

    Board independence is important.

  • As a fiduciary must be invested with authority commensurate with responsibilities

  • Can provide an important control


Integration

Integration

Degree of Integration2-Year4-year

Dependent44%24%

(Effectively functions as a unit of the institution which provides office space, staff, other support)

Interdependent49%49%

(Receives some free in-kind benefits, such as office space, service of university employees)

Independent7%28%

(Operates with a high level of autonomy and reimburses the university of the use of institutional resources)

AGB 2011


Foundation board independence

Foundation Board Independence

  • As a fiduciary body it must be invested with authority commensurate with its responsibilities

  • Can provide an important control

  • An independent board is still bound by its mission, the fundamental duties of care, loyalty, and obedience, and the obligation to fulfill its public purposes

  • Rogue foundation boards are rare

  • Benign neglect and a failure to clearly define expectations and reinforce them through orientation, ongoing education, and assessment are all too common


Foundation chief executive

Foundation Chief Executive

52% of foundation CEOs also serve as officers of the university

Compensation & Reporting

Paid by foundation/reports to board27%

Paid by foundation/ dual report9%

Paid by both/dual report13%

Paid by institution/ reports to president17%

Paid by institution/ dual report 34%

AGB 2011


Staffing

Staffing

  • Truly independent staffing and infrastructure requires a significant endowment (less if the foundation is primarily an asset manager)

  • University staffing ensures clear reporting lines and seamless alignment of institution priorities and the work of the foundation

  • Lack of dedicated staff may undermine the effectiveness and leadership potential of the board

  • Dual reporting relationships are the most common model but can, at times, pose challenges for the incumbent

  • If a board is charged with meaningful responsibilities they must be provided with the resources required to fulfill those responsibilities

  • C


Common revenue sources percentage utilizing from 2010 case survey

Common Revenue Sources—Percentage Utilizing– from 2010 CASE Survey


As a percentage of foundation funding mean from 2010 case survey

As a Percentage of Foundation Funding (mean) – from 2010 CASE Survey


Hallmarks of effective partnerships

Hallmarks of Effective Partnerships

  • Clarity and consensus about the role of the foundation

    • MOU

  • Integrated planning and the alignment of strategic priorities

    • Financial, annual development priorities, campaigns

  • Trust, candor, and regular communication

  • Formal and transparent business practices

  • Flexibility


The impact of foundations

The Impact of Foundations

“… by and large, what we’re working on today is going to have the greatest benefit to the university 15, 20, 25 years from now.”

Gary Bloom, founding chair, Cal Poly Foundation

“Working Toward a Working Foundation Board”


Agb member resources

AGB Member Resources

AGB Knowledge Center, sample documents, and policies

Regional meetings

Online discussion lists for foundation executives, attorneys, and board professionals

Trusteeship Magazine, research reports, books, and other publications

Foundation consulting service and consultant on call

If you have a question please just give us a call

David Bass, (202) 776-0850 [email protected]


  • Login