SES AR DEFINITION PHASE

1. SESAR DEFINITION PHASE An Introduction to NexSAT Steering Group, Air-Ground Communications Focus Group, ICAO ACP WG-C Brussels, Sept 18th, 2006 Jens Federhen, SESAR Project Directorate

2. 2005 2010 2015 2020 Definition SESAR Phases Development Deployment Implementation Development work Planning work Current work SESAR Lifecycle A European Plan to unlock Viable Growth in Air Transport • Converging Industry, EC & EUROCONTROL • Needs: • Turn off fragmented approach • Accelerate ATM evolution in response to challenges • Synchronise & integrate plans from research to operations • Synchronise airborne and ground deployments

3. SESAR Definition Phase: Objectives • Define European air transport system performance requirements up to 2020 and beyond. • Identify globally interoperable and harmonised ATM solutions • Establish a detailed and phased implementation and deployment plan, • Produce the detailed Research and Technology and validation work programme, • Propose the legislative, financial and regulatory framework Source: CALL FOR TENDERS Nº AO/03/HQ/EC/05, Requirement Specification for Core Activity, p. 5&6

4. One ATM Master Plan: developed by the SESAR Consortium, to be shared by ALL stakeholders The SESAR Definition Phase is funded by the European Commission’s TEN-T Programme and EUROCONTROL The SESAR Definition Phase • From agreed performance requirements to implementation of the future European ATM Network

5. CONSORTIUM

6. Consortium: a broad basis of expertise PROJECT EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (10 voting rights) Project Directorate Military Users ANSPs Airports Supply Industry (1) (Secretary) (Observer) (4) (3) (2) GLOBAL CONSORTIUM (co - contracting arrangements) Air Traffic Alliance AEA AENA AAS Airbus GIE Air France Austrocontrol AENA Selex SI EURAMID Airbus ERA DFS BAA BAE Systems BOEING, Rockwell, Honeywell EADS IAOPA DSNA FRAPORT EADS Thales ATM IFATCA IATA ENAV LFV INDRA Thales SA ATC EUC Iberia LFV Thales ATM Munich Airport JATWMG Lufthansa LVNL Thales Avionics ADP KLM CAA UK NATS Subcontracting Research Centres NAV arrangements (10) for admin EBAA purposes ECA Content Responsibility (4 Basic Consortia and Project Associates ) Airspace Users Basic ANSPs Basic Airports Basic Supply Industry Potential Project Project Directorate Consortium Consortium Consortium Basic Consortium Associates Members (8) Members (9) Members (7) Members (7) + EUROCONTROL

7. MANAGEMENT

8. ARPT IND User ANSP EURC RCT MIL SR Pilots CTRL US-IND Work Programme System Definition Implementation Plan Institutional SESAR Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) 1. Institutional Framework Definition 2. Performance Requirements & System Definition 3. Implementation Plan Definition 4. Work Programme for 2007-2012 Workpackage Task

9. MARKET M1 SPECIFICATION PRODUCT M2 DEPLOYMENT M3 ACTION PLAN M4 GO AHEAD M5 M6 Analyse air transport value and role of ATM Define organisation & work- programme 2007-2012 Performance requirements Deployment sequence analysis Build the ATM Master Plan ATM Target Concept selection The Project Milestones Building the Master Plan for the Future

10. D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 WBS WP Coordinators Milestone Manager R/O/W resp. Content Integrators Relationship Process / Content Executive Committee Collocation Project Directorate CIT process content Participants Reporting lines Responsibility assignment Personnel assignment Sequence of activities

11. COMMUNICATION&Buy-In

12. Buy-in • The SESAR Consortium gathers a wide range of expertise • Still, a wider consultation is crucial: • The Air Transport Community at large • Pro-active Communication strategy to involve external organisations and integrate their comments/positions within the six main deliverables of the Project • SESAR Forum organisation • Feed-back process on Deliverables

13. AGCFG - SESAR cooperation • AGCFG can assist the SESAR project in particular • to understand the Future Communication Study assessment, results and recommendations • In contributing to create common SESAR/AGTF positions • SESAR can assist AGCFG in particular by • enlarging the dissemination of FCS work • providing stakeholder feedback to AGTF • endorsing through this feedback common reference positions • AGCFG/SESAR cooperation is key to both projects • Through this we could achieve : • Consensus on key technologies • Harmonised selection of aviation related technology, with no unjustified proliferation of multiple technologies addressing the same needs. • Global interoperability

14. Where can AGCFG assist? • AGCFG experts support is needed on communications strategy : • To disseminate,and to explain the initial communications strategy • This is particularly scope of D1 phase of SESAR (Mar - June 06) • To create full understanding & rationale between AGCFG & SESAR stakeholders on choices, methodology, candidate technologies, issues etc. related to the future communications strategy • This is particularly the scope of D3/D4 phase of SESAR (Sep 06 - Oct 07); • Openly respond to SESAR stakeholders questions

15. Interoperability : a Key Objective • Interoperability of systems, Constituents and Procedures : one of the four packages from the SES legislation • Standardisation : - a key aspect for interoperability • In the Definition Phase : • Dedicated Work Packages • US Industry partners • Buy-in – They are involved : JURG, RTCA, EUROCAE, ETSI, CANSO, FAA / ICAO through EUROCONTROL

16. Work package 2.5 • Working package 2.5 Technology Assessment • The overall goals of this WP are: • Identification and characterisation of candidate technologies (available and new / innovative ones) in order to support the concept of operation and the architecture options for mid & long-term objectives • Identification of risks and blocking points concerning the introduction of the candidate technologies (e.g. open technical issues or technology availability) • Development of a strategy how to resolve the identified risks and blocking points • A consensus is needed on a technology roadmap. The roadmap must: • operationally support future ATS • be applicable worldwide and institutionally accepted • include supporting R&D themes

17. Paving the way for the Single European Sky Implementation

18. Backup slides

19. SESAR is a European ATM Implementation Programme: Air Navigation Service Providers, Airlines, Airports, Manufacturing Industry, Military users/providers, Professional Associations, Regulators, EUROCONTROL and Research Organisations ‘SESAR’ Air transport industry unsolicited proposal to EC 31-03-04 SESAR Implementation Programme Phase 1: 2008-2013 R&T/D, Validation Deployment 2-year Definition Phase 2006-2008 SESAR ATM Master Plan To the 2020 ATM concept Where does the SESAR ATM Master Plan fit ?

20. EC 30M€ Euro 30M€ 10 20 Total: 60M€ 10.6M€ 9.4M€ effort 40M€ cash ~50M€ TEN-T Funding Structure • First Lot allocated under the 2004 TEN-T programme (14m€) • Second Lot to be allocated in 2005 (plus 2006?) • Member States support essential

21. SESAR Definition Phase Governance Information & Consultation Mechanisms Single European Sky Committee Stakeholder Consultation Group European Commission EUROCONTROL Industry Consultation Body EC/EUROCONTROL Steering Board Contractual Relationship European Commission Consortium EUROCONTROL Agency Consortium

22. Project Directorate organisation Project Director Project Assistant Quality & Risk Manager Contract & Finance Manager PMO Performance Manager Communication Managers Configuration & Data Manager • Project Directorate • Ensures the Project control, time and cost management, • Handles a master project plan, integrating the dashboards associated to the processes under monitoring (progress, risks, quality,…). • Reports to the Executive Committee, and to the Purchaser and the European Commission within the mandate attributed to it by the Executive Committee. Milestone Manager WP Coordinators

23. Management of Multi-disciplinary Activities (SOW) • Challenge: Overcome traditional barriers between stakeholder groups, nations, etc. • Solution: Create a “customer-contractor” type of relationship through three levels of responsibility • R (“Requirement”) level • O (“Operational”) level • W (“Work”) level • R level • Overall operational responsibility at WP level (baseline: SOW), including • Specification of individual Tasks • Content coordination within Work Packages • Overall Work Package consistency • Endorsement and integration • O level • Responsibility on Task level (according to requirements defined by R level), inclduding: • Technical content • Output of deliverables. • W level • Contribution work within a given Task under the control of O level • may be performed by multiple Participants.

24. Linking content and process SESAR Definition Phase can only be successful in a collaborative effort. Collaboration without guidance (better: “organisation”) is risky. • ATM comprises many disciplines. • For each of these disciplines there are specialised entities. • None of these entities has enough knowledge of the other disciplines to take leadership over them. • Such a claim would not be acceptable for the other entities. • No entity is willing, nor able, to be main contractor • Cost/Schedule problems • Efficiency losses • Unsatisfactory quality of project results • Frustration of stakeholders and loss of buy-in • Project may lose track! • In addition, the Purchaser and the general public need a well-defined interface to the project Separation of “Content” and “Process” • Content: R/O/W • Process and Interface: Project Directorate Reconciliation of “Content” and “Process”: Content Integration Team (CIT)

25. Definition Phase: a new Approach • Shared objectives • Shared Expertise: • ~ 50 participating companies / associations / … • contributing to the Buy-in of results by the Air Transport Community at large • Shared Governance: • The ExCom • The Content Integration Team • The Project Directorate • Shared Processes: • … working together in a coherent way

26. What after the Definition Phase ? • The ATM Master Plan : foundation for the Implementation phase • Development Phase: necessary development /validation work to be conducted, accompanying regulatory measures • Implementation Phase: deployment of the developed Master Plan in the European ATM. • SESAR Joint Undertaking being currently proposed by the EC: • to manage the Development Phase • to rationalise European technological development efforts

27. Management of Content Integration via Content Integration Team • Ensure consistency of results while: • WBS contains 20 WPs and 64 Tasks. • 40 to 50 organisations are working on R, O, and/or W level. • Timescale is tight (24 months) and many WPs and tasks run in parallel. • Establishment of a “Content Integration Team”: • Composed of Experts bringing expertise of the Basic Consortia. • Users (1) • ANSP (2) • Industry (2) • EUROCONTROL (tbd) • Definition of, and agreement on, Milestone Objective Plan with R levels (with O support). • Integrating output of Tasks and WPs into Milestone Deliverables.

28. Main functions of the Project Directorate • Day-to-day management of the Project • Interface to EUROCONTROL and Project Associates in contractual matters • Point of contact for external parties • Practical / logistics organisation of events • Ensure that the Project is carried out efficiently • Cost/Schedule planning and controlling • Control of adequate resource allocation • Quality Management, Risk Management, etc. • Manage E-Room and other common tools • Facilitate work of R/O/W to produce satisfactory results • Work-Package Co-ordinators, Milestone Co-ordinators, Performance Manager • Detect potential problems • Act as a moderator / facilitator amongst stakeholders

29. Executive Committee • The Executive committee is in charge of the overall direction and major decisions with a strategic and high level operational role. • It gives appropriate mandate to the project directorate for the daily project operations. • It supervises the work of the Content Integration Team. • It decides upon use of the Project reserve. • It is composed of : • 4 Users representatives including the Chairman, • 3 ANSPs representatives, • 2 Airports, • 1 Industry, • 1 Military observer. • All decisions should be based on consensus, where required voting mechanism applies with at least 75% for decision.

30. Key Objectives at each Milestone (1 of 2) • At M1 –Status of Current Situation & Future Expectations (D1) • Capture of Current Situation with clear identification of Rationale • Strengths, Weaknesses, Deficiencies, Overview of Current Initiatives, etc. • Expectations for Future • At M2 – will have Set of Requirements for Future ATM System Network (D2) • Outline Vision of Future Air Transport Industry & Role of ATM • Performance Requirements for Future Network • Identification of “Best Practice” & Principles upon which to Build • At M3 – will have Definition of Future ATM Target Concept (D3) • Concept of Operations • Architecture for Future ATM System Network • Set of Enabling Technologies Identified • Outline of Total Cost & Preliminary Assurance that Target is Viable

31. Key Objectives at each Milestone (2 of 2) • At M4 – will have a “Best” Deployment Sequence (D4) • Confirmation of Viability (Technical, Financial, Institutional, etc.) • Options for Deployment Sequence & Recommended “Best” Approach • Definition of Deployment Packages (Transition from Legacy Systems/Framework) • At M5 – will have the SESAR ATM Master Plan (D5) • Detailed Plan of Actions which All Relevant Organisations need to undertake to Implement Changes • Inputs to Future Business Plans, R&T/D Plans, Risk Assessment Régimes, Development of Future Management Processes, etc. • At M6 – will have Basis of SESAR Implementation Programme of Work for 2008-2013 (D6) • Proposed Management Structure for SESAR Implementation Phase • Proposed Structured Lifecycle & Methods to Support Implementation • Detailed Programme of Work for First 5 Years of Implementation Phase

32. D1 recommendations;Air Transport Framework & Air Traffic Management from a business perspective • Integrated “partners” • Link their businesses • Amortise effects of sudden fall in demand • Empowerment • ATM industry to make own business decisions • De-Fragmentation • Performance framework: a basis for decision making • Liberalised approach for the provision of Air Navigation

33. D1 recommendations: The Institutional View of ATM • Consistent framework of legislation & regulation • “Constructive tension” • Between institutional & business frameworks • Unambiguous ATM safety regulatory framework • Across the whole air transport industry • Global interoperability • By performance-based regulation & a simplified approach to developing standards • “Overarching” governance structure for implementation

34. Role of the Human in ATM Today • PROACTIVE APPROACH TO CHANGE MANAGEMENT • Collaboration, transparency & inclusiveness • Involvement of staff at all levels • Significant improvement • Resource planning • Licensing

35. D1 recommenadtion:Safety, Environment, Security& Transition Aspects • SAFETY • Accurate measurement of current level of safety • Stronger emphasis on safety design criteria • Importance of human in ATM • ENVIRONMENT • Proactive management approach • SECURITY • Security of future ATM System matching the risk • APPROACH TO TRANSITION • Flexibility in System’s architectural design • European ATM System “design authority” role must be central

36. D1 Recommendations:Operational & Technical View of the current ATM “System” • A- One Single “design” authority for European ATM System • empowered to define, plan & manage the implementation • of the System which has: • One functional architecture • An integrated ground-based and airborne systems design • Separation of Services: • ATM services • Supporting (technical) services • Physical assets • Flexibility • B- Focused R&D

37. D2 “ATM Performance Targets “ Overall Scope • An outline “vision” of the future air transport • industry and the role of ATM within it. • Framework of economic, safety, environmental and security regulation enabling a long term sustainable air transport • Identification of performance gaps and the potential for improvements • Flexibility to quickly adapt to market changes • A viable transition path needs to be achievable • Short term solutions to resolve the present urgent blocking points needs to be included • Business model supported by all stakeholders to achieve optimum benefits

38. D2 Key messages • Results First brain storming session Excom • Future market environment- Growing but following effects need to be considered. • Changes in market segments: UAV/VLJ/MIL/GA/BA • Security measures/risks • New traffic patterns within Europe and between continents • Fleet composition ( I.e effect A 380) • Open Sky Agreement • Fuel costs • Potential constraints Infrastructure Environment

39. D2 Key messages (Continued) • ATM services- Providing maximum added value (performance) to European Air transport noting: • Resolving fragmentation- Reduction ANSPs/Unbundling of services/Cost effectiveness • Commitment and business objectives from each stakeholder • Differential services/funding/financing/charging principles • Ownership of assets • Governance of R&D, network and services • Potential for competition/market mechanisms • ATM security • Need to improve predictability/flexibility/ adaptability of services • Changing human role in future ATM services

40. D3 Scope: ATM target concept • ATM target concept a concept being a combination of : • Operational concept element • The principles of operation • The architectural principles • The technical infrastructure • The supporting technologies