1 / 24

Nature of X-ray binaries in the Magellanic Clouds

Nature of X-ray binaries in the Magellanic Clouds. Andry RAJOELIMANANA 1 , 2 ( MSc ) Supervisor : Prof Phil CHARLES 1 , 2. 1 University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.

lauren
Download Presentation

Nature of X-ray binaries in the Magellanic Clouds

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Nature of X-ray binaries in the Magellanic Clouds Andry RAJOELIMANANA 1 , 2 (MSc) Supervisor : Prof Phil CHARLES 1 , 2 1 University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa 2 South African Astronomical Observatory , P.O. Box 9, Observatory 7935, South Africa

  2. Outline • Introduction and Background to the project • X-ray binaries : • Why are we interested in Magellanic Clouds? • Objectives and method used • Some preliminary results and findings • Future work • Microquasars( SS433, … ) • Conclusions • References

  3. Background X–ray binaries : • Degenerate primary ( NS , BH) • 1035 erg s-1 < Lx < 1039 erg s-1 • Low Mass X-ray Binaries (LMXB) • High Mass X-ray Binaries (HMXB)

  4. Background ( HMXBs ) • Young luminous massive stars • 2 types : • Supergiant X-ray binaries • Be/X-ray pulsar ( BeX) • Supergiant X-ray binaries • Supergiant companion star • Mass : 18 - 20 Msun • P < 10 days • Accretion modes : radiallyoutflowing stellar wind

  5. BeX binaries • Be star + X-ray pulsar • 2 discs : - Be equatorial disc - NS accretion disc • 3 possible periods • Pulse period • Orbital period • Super-orbital period (such as in A0538-66)

  6. Remarkable number of HMXBs in SMC • MMW / MSMC ~ 50 • 65 known HMXB in our galaxy • Now, we know 47 HMXBs in SMC 1 - 2 in the SMC expected Where are the Black Hole systems in the SMC ? Coe et al., 2008 • Closest approach of the SMC to the LMC ~ 100 Myrs ago.

  7. Objectives and method used • Studying the temporal properties of SMC/LMC X-ray binaries • Why are these SMC HMXBs all neutron star systems? where are the BH equivalents? • Do any of these BeX have the same properties as BeX system A0538-66 which shows a 421 days superorbital periodicity? What is causing this ? • Do any of this large number of HMXBs show properties similar to the microquasar SS433 ?

  8. Data used • Data used : long-term database. • MACHO [MAssive Compact Halo Objects] ( Alcock et al., 1996) • 1.25 m telescope at Mount Stromlo Observatory, Australia • Data available : from 1992 June - 2000 January • OGLE [ Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment] ( Udalsky et al,. 1997) • 1.3 m Warsaw telescope • at Las Campanas observatory, Chile • Phase II : January 1997 - ~ Dec 2000 • Phase III : June 2001 - until now

  9. Method used • We combined the light curves from MACHO, OGLE II, and OGLEIII of all known BeX. Macho data available from : http://wwwmacho.anu.edu.au/Data/MachoData.html OGLE II data : http://ogle.astrouw.edu.pl/ OGLE III data : http://ogle.astrouw.edu.pl/ogle3/xrom/xrom.html • Run Starlink PERIOD (package) to study their temporal properties. • Lomb-Scargle periodogram (Lomb, 1976) and (Scargle, 1982 ) • Phase dispersion minimization (PDM) (Stellingwerf, 1978) • Monte Carlo simulation • Fold the data

  10. Variability of A0538-66 • Porb : 16.65 days • Super-orbital period : ~ 421 days • Formation and depletion of the Be equatorial disc Alcock et al., 2001

  11. Some results and findings

  12. SXP6.85 (or XTE J0103-728) • Similar behaviour A0538-66 • Peaks at P= 671 days

  13. SXP293 (or RX J0058.2-7231) • Outbursts amplitude increases with the flux • Orbital period Porb = 59 days

  14. SXP293(or RX J0058.2-7231) Peak at a period Porb = 59 days

  15. SXP756 (or AX J0049.4-7323, or RX J0049.7-7323) Periodical outbursts near periastron passages

  16. LMXB :Supersoft X-ray sources (SSS) • TBB ~ 20-50 eV • Lbol ~ 1037 - 1038erg s-1 • SSS system : • WD • Sub-giant companion • High accretion rate , > 10-7Msun yrs-1 • WD burns H steadily at its surface • Contraction model : (Southwell et al., 1996) • accretion rate drops Optical luminosity decreases • rise in Teff • increase in X-ray luminosity • CAL 83 : X-ray emission occurs only during optical low state ( Grenier & Di Stefano, 2002)

  17. CAL83 ( X-ray / optical correlation) • X-ray data : ROSAT • Optical : MACHO ( blue ) Optical low X-ray on Optical high X-ray off Greiner & Di Stefano, 2002

  18. Lightcurve of CAL83 and RXJ0513.9-6951 [MACHO+Ogle III] Folded Lightcurve of CAL83 and RJX0513 with a P = 450 and 167 days , respectively

  19. Power spectrum of CAL83 and RXJ0513.9-6951 Peaks at P = 167.94 days Peaks at P = 450.24 days

  20. Future work • Finding more sources showing similar behaviour to A0538-66 using OGLE III data. • Why the compact object of all of these HMXBs are neutron star? • More understanding on the Supersoft X-ray binary • Investigating the variability of all these Be/X-ray pulsar if any of these has a periodicity comparable to 162 days as seen in SS433. • Finding the next SS433-like (continuous and precessing jets[disc]) among those HMXB in SMC . • Publish the result

  21. SS433 properties • SS433 : first known X-ray binary that emits relativistic jet • Only continuously emitting micro-quasar • Key feature : inclination : 79o e < 0.05 (Margon & Anderson 1989) Jet velocity : 0.26 d = 5.5 kpc (Blundell et al. 2004) Porb = 13.08 days Pprec = 162.5 days (Abell & Margon,1979) • f Ciatti et al., 1981

  22. Conclusion • Some BeX sources shows similar behaviour to A0538-66. • SSS CAL83 and RXJ0513.9-6951 show a variability in a timescale 450 days and 167.94 days respectively. • We still need more Ogle III data or other long term optical data for some sources. • Investigation of the next SS433-like among those large number of HMXB needs to be done

  23. References • Grimm et al. ,2003, Astron. Astrophys. Vol. 3 , Suppl., 257–269 • Coe et al., 2008, astro-ph 0809.2665v1 • Gardiner L.T. & Noguchi M, 1996,MNRAS, 278,191 • Alcock, C., Allsman, R.A., Alves, D. et al. 1996, MNRAS 280, L49 • Alcock, C. et al. 2001, MNRAS 321, 678. • Udalski, A., Kubiak, M., & Szymanski, M. 1997, Acta Astron., 47, 319 • Lomb, N. R. 1976, Ap&SS, 39, 447 • Stellingwerf, R. F.1978, ApJ 224, 953S • Scargle, J. D. 1982, ApJ, 263,835 • Greiner, J. and DiStefano, R. (2002), A&A 387, 944–54 • Ciatti et al., 1981 • Southwell, K.A., Livio, M., Charles, P.A., O’Donoghue, D. and Sutherland, W.J. (1996), ApJ 470, 1065–74

  24. Thanks for your attention

More Related