html5-img
1 / 27

Summary of activities in 2007 Italy contribution on BREF Analysis Open Problems

AGENDA. Summary of activities in 2007 Italy contribution on BREF Analysis Open Problems Methodology for domestic combustion Processes vs Combustion emissions Fugitive and diffuse PM emissions SNAP definition Address draft chapters Agree to the 2008 workplan.

Download Presentation

Summary of activities in 2007 Italy contribution on BREF Analysis Open Problems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AGENDA • Summary of activities in 2007 • Italy contribution on BREF Analysis • Open Problems • Methodology for domestic combustion • Processes vs Combustion emissions • Fugitive and diffuse PM emissions • SNAP definition • Address draft chapters • Agree to the 2008 workplan

  2. EP Update priorities and connected work as fixed at Expert Panel on Combustion and IndustryReport to plenary7° TFEIP & EIONET meeting on Emission Inventory & ProjectionThessaloniki, Greece, 31 october and 1-2 November 2006

  3. Plans for 2006/2007, Expert Panel on Combustion and Industry

  4. Plans for 2006/2007, Expert Panel on Combustion and Industry

  5. Summary of activities in 2007 • Define the main inputs of the Expert Panel to project team of editing authors (consultant) to restructuring the Guidebok • Provide the project team of editing authors with all information and all relevant underlying material (methods/emission factors) useful to update the guidebook • Support the project team in meeting the industry boards • Analysis of all industrial BREF (ITALY Delegation)

  6. 2007 Meeting • Expert Panel meeting, Rome, 16 April 2007 • Expert Panel meeting, Dessau, 23-24 may 2007 • Expert Workshop on Industrial Processes Utrecht, 11 September 2007 • Informal Meeting of EP with Consultant for GB update and Industry, London, 11 October

  7. Preparation of Rome meeting (industry partecipation to GB update) • The meeting was prepared: • Sending an invitation to all the people in Thessaloniki meeting • Individuating a list of industry reference people (the list was extracted from IPPC BREF documentation) • Sending a specific invitation to industry representative from the TFEIP chair • Inviting the Acting Head of the European IPPC Bureau in JRC

  8. Rome meeting Invited industry organizations • CONCAWE (the oil companies' European organisation for environment, health and safety) • European Aluminium Association • CEPI- Confederation of European Paper Industries • EUROFER - European Confederation of Iron and Steel Industries • CEMBUREAU - representative organisation of the cement industry in Europe • Eurometaux • CPIV - Comite Permanent des Industries du Verre Européenne Avenue Louise 89 • COTANCE - Confederation of National Associations of Tanners and Dressers • CERAME-UNIE Liaison Office of the Europ. Ceramic Industry • CIAA - Confederation of Food and Drink Industries of the EEC

  9. List of partecipant in Rome meeting • Carlo Trozzi co-leader of the Expert Panel on Combustion and Industry • Riccardo De Lauretis co-leader of the Expert Panel on Transport • Tinus Pulles TNO Built Environment and Geosciences • Jeroen Kuenen TNO Built Environment and Gceosciences • Nadine Allemand Expert Group on Techno-Economic Issues UNECE • Lourens Post CONCAWE (oil companies' Eur. org. for env. healt & safe.) • Brian Smithers CONCAWE • Ole Restad CEMBUREAU (organisation of the cement industry in Europe) • Eirik Nordheim European Aluminium Association • Fabrice Rivet CPIV (European Glass Industries) • Rémi Bussac EURELECTRIC (Union of the Electricity Industry) • Javier Pérez Rodríguez Universidad Politécnica de Madrid • Antonio Ferreiro Análisis Estadístico de Datos

  10. Conclusions of Rome meeting • Industry clearly expressed its interest in co-operating with the Guidebook project • The Guidebook project team is eager to intensify the co-operation with industry • the industries will have involved in revise the chapters of new Guidebook, also if the responsibility of the revision of the Guidebook will be on Commission supported by the Advisor Editorial Group • the Guidebook project team is ready to retrieve all the relevant information on the new technologies available in the Expert Group on techno-economic documentation

  11. Dessau meeting • Report from previous meetings • Main discussion about sector specific tests

  12. Dessau meeting conclusions about sector specific tests (*) (*) Not all the people agree with the inter pollutants test at all

  13. Dessau Projections expert panel (PEP) meeting25th May 2007Identification of areas where the C&IEP and PEP can reciprocally help(Conclusion/Suggestion of EP leader presentation) • Shared Emission factors definition • Shared SNAP rubric definition • Shared Activities rate evaluation methodologies • Shared penetration factors

  14. Uthrect & London workshops • Workshops aim at discussing GB zero order drafts with relevant industry experts looking at remaining problems and data gaps • Discussion about the Tier concept • Discussion about splitting process and combustion emissions • Industry is not very happy with the reporting format (NFR), because of the split between combustion and process emissions • Discussion about fuel or product based EFs for process with combustion (ex. cement, glass,...)

  15. Uthrect meeting partecipants • Carlo Trozzi (leader Expert Panel for Combustion & Industry) • Bart van Konijnenburg (Royal VNP, on behalf of CEPI) • Ton Schrijvers (CORUS, on behalf of Eurofer) • Claude Lorea (Cembureau) • Jose M. Adzet (AIICA, on behalf of Cotance) • Fabrice Rivet (VGI-FIV) • Ruud Beerkens (TNO, also representing the Glass Industry) • Guy Teckels (CPIV) • Nicola Brophy (AEA, project team member) • Tinus Pulles (TNO, project team member) • Wilfred Appelman (TNO, project team member) • Jeroen Kuenen (TNO, project team member)

  16. London meeting partecipants • Tom Massey RWENpower/Eurelectric • John Stockdale Britglass • Neil Haines Corus Grp/Eurofer • Brian Smithers CONCAWE • Nadine Allemand CITEPA • Mike Woodfield AEA, Chair • Justin Goodwin AEA • Nicola Brophy AEA

  17. Italy contribution on BREF Analysis • APAT (Italy Environmental Protection Agency) financial support the work and supervise it • The work was realized in the spring/summer 2007 by Techne Consulting • A report was produced that incorporate also the sectors already analysed in the last years and included in previous revision on Guidebook • The work has regarded the only individuation and extraction of relevant emissions factors from the BREF documentation and presentation in Tables • A report will be send to the TFEIP segretariat and to the consultant in the next weeks

  18. List of industrial BREF (all included in the work)

  19. Heavy metals and EXPREME Project The task of EP finalized to: The Use output of ESPREME and other projects to update EF’s and recommendations on HM in the Guidebook was resolved with the contribute to German delegation, see the relation to plenary: Improvements of HM information in the Guidebook Jochen Teloke (Germany)

  20. Open Problems • Methodology for domestic combustion • Processes vs Combustion emissions • Fugitive and diffuse emissions • SNAP definition

  21. Small Combustion methodology update From Thessaloniki meeting • New GB must indicated the possible sources of data and possible surrogate methodology particularly regarding technologies penetration (very important for small combustion installations) referring to different Tiers • Domestic Combustion needs Tier 3 (emissions estimate model) methodologies to be developed; EP collect information from member states in order to recommend an unified user methodology in input GB project; EP recommend that this activity will be funded in the frame of GB project

  22. Processes vs Combustion emissions 1 • where we have boilers or heaters in which the combustion is not affected by the process we are in sector 0301 Combustion in boilers, gas turbines and stationary engines; fuel consumption have to be allocated to 0301 • if the fuel is in contact with the products (steel, cement, ...) we have combustion processes with contact (0303 Processes with contact); the emissions factors must be preferably expressed in function of output of the process (g/Mg steel, g/Mg cement, ...) and can be different for different fuel used; emissions factor in function of fuels burned can be included in the chapter but only as references; fuel consumption do not have to be allocated to 0301

  23. Processes vs Combustion emissions 2 • if the steam are in contact with the products (for examples sometimes processes of drying paper) we have: • the emissions for steam generation that can be different for different fuel used: we are in sector 0301 Combustion in boilers, gas turbines and stationary engines; fuel consumption have to be allocated to 0301 • combustion process (combustion with contact) in the activities 030321 Paper-mill industry (drying processes); the emissions factors must be preferably expressed in function of output of process (g/Mg paper, ...) and allocate to SNAP 04…; no fuel consumption

  24. Processes vs Combustion emissions 3 • if the exhaust gases of boilers and heaters are in contact with the products (for examples sludge drying, ...) we have combustion processes with contact (0303 Processes with contact); the emissions factors must be preferably expressed in function of output of the process (g/Mg sludge, ...) and can be different for different fuel used; emissions factor in function of fuels used can be included in the chapter but only as references; fuel consumption do not have to be allocated to 0301

  25. Fugitive and diffuse emissions The EP recommend to the consultant to take into consideration all the relevant process actually not included in the GB (see also, but not only, the new SNAP proposal)

  26. SNAP nomenclature • Coordination of activities for updating SNAP versions keeping them in line with methodological advances and new reporting requirements • Maintenance of SNAP correspondence with other nomenclatures: CRF, NFR, RAINS/GAINS, NACE, PRODCOM, … • Repository and clearing-house centre for (SNAP/NFR) emissions inventories/projections oriented to facilitate inter-countries control checks of the their (SNAP/NFR) emissions inventories • Projections scenarios nomenclature: Harmonization of names and contents

  27. Revision Process • Consultant send to EP leader the list of relevant chapters for review • EP leader circulate the list and ask to EP member cooperation in review project • EP leader prepare a program for review the GB chapters included time and people

More Related