Global Ocean Heat Content 1955-2007 in light of recently revealed instrumentation problems. Ocean Climate Laboratory National Oceanographic Data Center- NOAA XBT Drop-rate Meeting March 10, 2008 Miami, FL. Syd Levitus, John Antonov, Tim Boyer. Conclusions.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Global Ocean Heat Content 1955-2007 in light of recently revealed instrumentation problems
Ocean Climate Laboratory
National Oceanographic Data Center- NOAA
XBT Drop-rate Meeting
March 10, 2008
Syd Levitus, John Antonov, Tim Boyer
The figure below left shows the GK2007 XBT “bias” correction as a function of time
compared with the OCL correction. Note the extreme values in the GK2007 results
which are difficult to believe.
The figure below right shows the number of 4x2 boxes that meet the observation criteria
as a function of time for both MBT and XBT comparisons based on OCL computations.
Geographical bias of the correctionsPercent ocean area of 2-degree zonal belts with 4 Long x 2 Lat differences between XBT and CTD/OSD pairs at 50 m depth
As shown in a previous slide there are very few MBT-CTD/OSD pairs after 1990
which is why our new ocean heat content estimates do not use MBT data after 1990.
The presence of a shallow subsurface maximum in the above difference field suggests differences in either MBT thermistor and/or pressure sensing elements as compared to CTDs and reversing thermometers.
0-700 m layer
Levitus et al. (2005)
0-1500 m layer
0-3000 m layer
Is there enough data to produce reasonable estimates of upper ocean heat content?
A comparison between global SST time series from NCDC and the UKMO Hadley Centre based on > 130 million SST
observations from ICOADS and the global SST time series based on WOD05 (7.9 million SST obs.) show excellent
agreement. Of course we continue adding additional historical as well as modern data to reduce uncertainty in our estimates.
The corrections for the XBT drop-rate problems are empirically determined by
comparing XBT observations with those from CTDs and reversing thermometers.
This means that as the number and/or distribution of XBT-thermometer pairs or
XBT CTD pairs change the XBT ”bias” correction could change.
No changes should me made to original XBT data. The corrections which P.I.s apply
to XBTs should be made available with the publication of any scientific work.
Even if we find some systematic error in manufacturing etc. the corrections to XBT
data should not be made to the original data. This is the present recommended policy
with the XBT drop-rate problem as discussed by Hanawa et al. ( 1995 ). This is
because our “correction” may be modified in the future.
Acquiring additional historical as well as modern CTD and Bottle data is critical for
improving the estimates of time dependent XBT biases.
XBT-CTD comparisons should be done at least every year
Follow the “GCOS Climate Monitoring Principles”
Effective monitoring systems for climate should adhere to the following principles* (pdf): (* The ten basic principles (in paraphrased form) were adopted by the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) through decision 5/CP.5 at COP-5 in November 1999. This complete set
of principles was adopted by the Congress of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) through Resolution 9 (Cg-XIV) in
May 2003; agreed by the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS) at its 17th Plenary in November 2003; and adopted
by COP through decision 11/CP.9 at COP-9 in December 2003.)
1) The impact of new systems or changes to existing systems should be assessed prior to implementation.
2) A suitable period of overlap for new and old observing systems is required.
3) The details and history of local conditions, instruments, operating procedures, data processing algorithms and other factors
pertinent to interpreting data (i.e., metadata) should be documented and treated with the same care as the data themselves.
4) The quality and homogeneity of data should be regularly assessed as a part of routine operations.
5) Consideration of the needs for environmental and climate-monitoring products and assessments, such as IPCC assessments,
should be integrated into national, regional and global observing priorities.
6) Operation of historically-uninterrupted stations and observing systems should be maintained.
7) High priority for additional observations should be focused on data-poor regions, poorly observed parameters, regions sensitive
to change, and key measurements with inadequate temporal resolution.
8) Long-term requirements, including appropriate sampling frequencies, should be specified to network designers, operators and
instrument engineers at the outset of system design and implementation.
9) The conversion of research observing systems to long-term operations in a carefully-planned manner should be promoted.
10) Data management systems that facilitate access, use and interpretation of data and products should be included as essential
elements of climate monitoring systems.