1 / 24

Walter S. Lasecki , Kyle I. Murray, Samuel White, Jeffrey P. Bigham

Robert C. Miller. University of Rochester Computer Science ROCHCI. MIT CSAIL. Walter S. Lasecki , Kyle I. Murray, Samuel White, Jeffrey P. Bigham. Introduction. Introduction. Introduction. End-User Interface. Introduction. Worker Interface. Introduction. Outline. Input Mediators

lanza
Download Presentation

Walter S. Lasecki , Kyle I. Murray, Samuel White, Jeffrey P. Bigham

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Robert C. Miller University of Rochester Computer Science ROCHCI MIT CSAIL Walter S. Lasecki, Kyle I. Murray, Samuel White, Jeffrey P. Bigham

  2. Introduction

  3. Introduction

  4. Introduction End-User Interface

  5. Introduction Worker Interface

  6. Introduction Outline Input Mediators Experiments Other Applications

  7. Introduction Input Mediators Experiments Conclusion Input Mediators WalterLasecki University of Rochester Human-Computer Interaction

  8. Input Mediators Mob Solo Active Vote Leader Mob

  9. Input Mediators Mob Solo Active Vote Leader Solo

  10. Input Mediators Mob Solo Active Vote Leader Active

  11. Input Mediators Mob Solo Active Vote Leader Active

  12. Input Mediators Mob Solo Active Vote Leader Vote

  13. Input Mediators Mob Solo Active Vote Leader Vote

  14. Input Mediators Mob Solo Active Vote Leader Leader

  15. Input Mediators Mob Solo Active Vote Leader Leader Worker Influence

  16. Experiments Robot Control

  17. Experiments Robot Control: Results

  18. Experiments Robot Control: Results

  19. Experiments OCR

  20. Experiments OCR: Results • Vote: 0 / 10 tasks completed • Active: 9 / 10 completed • Leader: 9 / 10 completed • 22% reduction in completion time

  21. Experiments Other Applications

  22. Experiments Other Applications

  23. Conclusion Conclusion Real-time crowd control, closed-loop interface Control nearly any existing interface Elected leaders given direct control Single worker model

  24. Conclusion Thank you!

More Related