1 / 30

THE INTEGRAL ASSESSMENT OF BIOTERRORISM THREAT Episode III. ONE YEAR AFTER. THE CHARACTER OF THREATS AND MAIN THREATS R

THE INTEGRAL ASSESSMENT OF BIOTERRORISM THREAT Episode III. ONE YEAR AFTER. THE CHARACTER OF THREATS AND MAIN THREATS RANKING. . Konstantyn Atoyev. Glushkov Institute of Cybernetics National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. CHARACTER OF THREATS. The threats of bioterrorism

lani
Download Presentation

THE INTEGRAL ASSESSMENT OF BIOTERRORISM THREAT Episode III. ONE YEAR AFTER. THE CHARACTER OF THREATS AND MAIN THREATS R

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. THE INTEGRAL ASSESSMENT OF BIOTERRORISM THREATEpisode III. ONE YEAR AFTER.THE CHARACTER OF THREATS AND MAIN THREATS RANKING. Konstantyn Atoyev Glushkov Institute of Cybernetics National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

  2. CHARACTER OF THREATS The threats ofbioterrorism have univerversal character. They include almost all ty- pes of threat, that menti- oned in the National Strategy for Homeland Security [1] also in Con- cept of Foreighn Police of Russua [2]:

  3. 1. Local and regional threats 2. Transnational threats3. The spread of dangerous technologies4. Disruption of governmental structures work

  4. These threats may be classify on there origins by follows: 1. Applications of advanced biotechnologies for terrorism. 2. Information on how to produce and dis- seminate pathogens and toxins is readily available in open sources.3. Corruption and money laundering increase.

  5. 4. Strengthening of authoritarism and spreading of fundamental ideology of various genesis due to problems of world economical globalization (migration, unemployment, vast disparities between rich and poor, collision of cultures), 5. The antiterroristic and anticrime legisla- tion is no effective also as efforts of dif- ferent force poles of terrorism struggle.

  6. 6. Contradictions between necessity of society liberalization during transfor- ming from industrial epoch to epoch of computer nets, when more effective horizontal structures push out vertical integration and struggle withcorruption becomes more difficult.

  7. WHY BIOLOGICAL AND TOXIN WEAPONS ARE LIKELY TO BECOME EVER MORE ATTRACTIVE TO CRIMINALS AND TERRORISTS ? ?

  8. Main reasons: • 1. The advanced biotechnologies have increased opportunities to weaponize pathogens due to: • Site-directed mutagenesis • Elaboration of a new type of virus • Development of functional genomics

  9. 2. Increasing number of experts in biosciences caused by development of: • Biotechnology • Pharmacology • Environmental and health delivery • industries • Information availability in open sources

  10. 3. Difficulties in biological weapon discovering caused by: • The absence of defensive technologies of • real time regim • The tactical weapons utilizing pathogens • or toxins can be designed so that they • are easily hidden

  11. Where is the powerful source of terrorism ?

  12. 1. The lowering of national gove-rnments possibilities in struggle against crime caused by main tendencies of the third millennium: • Economical globalization • Social disruptions • Corruption (organized and transnational • crimes, drug and firearm trafficking, • laundering of money)

  13. 2. Mental disadaptation caused by the peculiarities of modern society • urbanization • industrialization • technological progress • total population migration • development of mass-media • icrease of national and cultural contacts

  14. 3. Confusion of traditional social and religious norms in human mentality • Mutual penetration of matrixes ofwest and orient worldview • The great populations of their bearers immersed in alien culture, alien landscape alien reality perception

  15. 4. Disparities between political institutes development andacceleration of economics and social system transforming in conveniencewith Hundtington conception [3].

  16. What is the main threat? Accumulation of enormous finances by crime structures($300 –500 billions of money laundered each year) Finance + Technics Advanced biotechnologies (especially DNA technologies and genetic and protein engineering) + People strengthening of authorita-rism and spread of fundamental ideology of various genesis are the powerful source

  17. Pooling of enormous finances, ad-vanced biotechnologies and authorita-rian personalities gives dangerous explosive mixtuare. That is why the opinion that only well sup-ported, longterm national BW programs would attempt genetic engineering projects for the purpose of weaponizing pathogens [4] is not quite correct now.

  18. PATHWAYS OF PROBLEMS SOLUTION

  19. The analysis of main difficulties of the struggle with bioterrorism allows emphasize two groups of problems. Mental problems Technological problems Criminality Finance FffF Authoritarian & fun-damental ideology Biotechnologies

  20. The technologicalcombines the following questions: 1. What are the main threats, connected with applications of advanced biotechno-logies for terrorism? 2. What targets of bioterrorist attacks are the weakest links, which lead to the maximum waste for society? 3. How we can struggle with these threats?

  21. The mental group combines the following questions: 1. How people come to terrorism? 2. What cognitve and emotional factors have affected this decision? 3. How we can preserve them from this choose?

  22. The first problem solution demands the following actions: 1. Development of more sensitive monito-ring systems and preserve technologies, which increase the efficacy of public health and environmental service various measures.

  23. 1. Proper waste disposal, water treatment, and air filtration;2. Elaboration of new therapeutics, such as antibiotics, germicides, and other agents, weaken or kill the pathogen.3. Prevention of infectious diseases through vaccine and antitoxin R&D.4. Seeking methods, which augment the patient ability to resist infection.5. Lowering the probability of long time contacts with pathogens.

  24. 2. Innovation of Global Epidemic Defense Systems that would be elaborated on the basis of modern information and avia-space tehnologies and on the advances of the genetic and protein engineering and may assisted by ground and satellite tracking systems.

  25. These high technological systems can be utilized for two cardinal questions solution: 1. To minimize the lag time between attack beginning and time when it would identify. 2. Transform priorities from reacting on co-nsequences (the tactic of “yesterday’s planning” [5]) to control of event’s risks or, another wards, “to be constantly ada-pted to meet emerging challenges”.

  26. 3. Elaboration of information technologies of regulation, processing and analysis grate mass of information, obtained due to systems of space and aviation video- audio-techniques monitoring, forecasting and optimal control.

  27. These technologies will allow solve some tasks of rare events forecasting, early recognition of threats and their assessment, ranking and control of preservation or liquidation of consequences in online regime [6].

  28. The problems of the mental group are caused by main tendencies of the third millennium: economical globalization, social disruptions, corruption, mental disadaptation. Their solution demands more efforts and will be connected with bases of our civilization functioning.

  29. This lecture is based on 1. Securing the homeland, strengthening the nation (2002) http://www.whitehouse.gov/homeland/ homeland_security_book.html2. Shubert T.E. Some aspects of efficacy of the US National Defence system//Pravo i politika. – 2001.- №6.- С. 56-63 [In Rus.].3. Garrett L. The nightmare of bioterrorism// Foreighn Affairs.- 2001.- V.80.-№1.-Р. 76-89.

  30. 4. Hundtington S.P. Political Order in Changing Societies.- New Haven, 1968.5. Probst P. (2001) Antiterrorism – some aspects of organization// National Defence, № 9-10.- С. 21-25. [in Rus.]6. Atoyev K.L.(2002) Epidemiological risk assessment:early recognition of risks and identification and ranking of critical factors //Proc. ISEA /ISEE 2002 .-Vancouver, BC, Canada

More Related