Fea drm success strategy
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 22

FEA DRM Success Strategy PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 80 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

FEA DRM Success Strategy. Michael C. Daconta Metadata Program Manager February 3, 2005. DHS Metadata Program Manager DHS Data Management Strategy Expose and Exchange Standardize and Govern Integrate and Federate Technical Lead of the DRM Working Group

Download Presentation

FEA DRM Success Strategy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Fea drm success strategy

FEA DRM Success Strategy

Michael C. DacontaMetadata Program ManagerFebruary 3, 2005


Speaker introduction

DHS Metadata Program Manager

DHS Data Management Strategy

Expose and Exchange

Standardize and Govern

Integrate and Federate

Technical Lead of the DRM Working Group

In conjunction with the FEA PMO and CIO Council

See Karen Evans memo to CIO Council dated 12/22/2004

DHS Data Standards Representative for:

EO 13356 and HSPD 5, 6, 11

Author

See latest article on Formal Taxonomies at XML.com

Speaker Introduction


Agenda

Agenda

  • The Big Picture …

  • Scope

  • Measures of Success

  • Implementation Plan

  • Schedule/Milestones

  • How you can Help!


Fea drm success strategy

Copernican Shift

We had it all wrong…

In the beginning…

Data

Apps

Apps

Apps

Apps

Put the “smarts” in the data… watch what happens…


Scope 1 where we are today

Scope (1): Where we are today…

  • Volume 1 is released.

    • http://www.feapmo.gov

  • Agency comments have been collected

    • Send your comments to [email protected]

    • We plan on posting comments (without attribution) to a public site

  • DRM Working Group planning is underway

    • Broad participation including State and Local

    • Address Business and Technical Issues

    • Foster broad adoption and implementation

    • Satisfy the Presidential Orders/Directives


Fea drm success strategy

Scope (2) : EO 13356

Strengthening the Sharing of Terrorism Information to Protect Americans

  • Section 1. Policy: “Agencies shall … give the highest priority to … interchange of terrorism information among between agencies and appropriate authorities of States and local governments [while protecting] the freedom … of Americans….”

  • Section 3. Preparing Terrorism Information for Maximum Distribution within Intelligence Community. IC Agencies shall set forth “standards for sharing of terrorism information by agencies within the Intelligence Community with [through DHS] appropriate authorities of State and local governments.”

  • Section 4. Requirements for Collection of Terrorism Information Inside the United States. Attorney General, Secretary for Homeland Security, and the DCI shall jointly submit their “recommendation on the establishment of executive branch-wide collection and sharing requirements, procedures, and guidelines for terrorism information to be collected within the United States, including, but not limited to, from publicly available sources, including nongovernmental databases.

  • Section 5. Establishment of the Information Systems Council. “The mission of the Council is to plan for and oversee the establishment of an interoperable terrorism information sharing environment to facilitate automated sharing of terrorism information among appropriate agencies….”


Scope 3

What are we trying to accomplish?

Revise DRM Volume 1

Respond to all comments

Add a glossary

Make Volume 1: Complete, Consistent and Cohesive.

See DRM for Information Sharing Brief

Complete the DRM

Volumes 2, 3 and 4

Correct Volume Strategy?

Enable Implementation of the DRM

Implementation Profiles

Foster Broad Government and Vendor Adoption

Scope (3)


Measures of success

Two years after completion of the DRM, how will we decide if it is successful?

Enables Tangible Business Outcomes

EO 13356 and HSPD-11 are successfully implemented.

Shared spaces are more than portals

Number of interagency exchanges has increased dramatically

Taxonomies will be tailored to specific, narrow user communities.

Core registry is operational and effective in promoting reuse

Leaders can ask “Enterprise Questions” and get accurate cross-domain, cross-agency answers

How else will it improve Discovery, Integration, Relevance and Reuse?

See XML 2004 keynote slides

Real-time Relevance?

Please share with us your Measures of Success and Performance Metrics

Measures of Success


Implementation plan 1

Working Group Structure

Working Group Collaboration

Transparency

Broaden the Scope

Volume Strategy

Implementation Strategy

Metrics and Feedback Loop

Implementation Plan (1)


Plan working group structure

Three tiers

Public participation

Virtual

“Wiki”

Quarterly F2F Forums

Team participation

Stakeholders, Team Leads/Editors

Bi-Weekly Meetings

Business Sponsor Group

Executive Committee

Dispute Resolution

Weekly Meetings

Plan: Working Group Structure

Exec

Teams

Public


Plan working group collaboration

Wiki

Team Site and Public Site

The “writable” web

File Upload/Download

List-servs

drm-public

drm-team

drm-business

drm-mgt

Registry (or Registries)

Core.gov

Send us your registry requirements!

Plan: Working Group Collaboration


Plan transparency

Principle: the group will operate in an open manner modeled after successful practices of other groups.

Example, open resolution of all comments on DRM Volume 1.

Comments will be given an identifier and posted on public wiki (without attribution).

Tiered structured is for logistics management and stakeholder responsibility; not for closed discussion on technical issues.

This group will learn as it goes and be willing to adjust course upon the introduction and agreement on better ideas.

Initial Focus: DRM Volume 1.1

Plan: Transparency


Fea drm success strategy

Plan: Revised DRM Structure

Context

Service Context

Security Context

Subject Context

Subject Area

Security Class

Service Class

Subject Class

Input/Output

Association

Association

Association

Who

When

What

Why

Where

Sharing

Information Exchange

Information Access

Exchange Class

Unique Identifiers

Exchange Payload

Query Class

Association

Association

Description

Data Element Description

Resource Description

Structured

Data Class

Semi-Structured

Resource Class

Data Property

Unstructured

Association

Association


Plan broad scope

Objective: Broaden participation by State and Local governments and create Performance Measures for the DRM around the Homeland Security mission.

Horizontal Information Sharing

Vertical Information Sharing

Address Business Issues and Technical Issues

DHS Information Sharing and Collaboration Program (ISCP) will lead a DRM Business Sponsors Group in conjunction with the OMB and other Stakeholders.

drm-business listserv

State and Local Participation through multiple avenues

Susan Turnbull coordinating.

Plan: Broad Scope


Plan volume strategy

Change the volume strategy from the current plan by creating cohesive volumes around functional lines.

Context

Exchange (possibly broadened to Information Sharing)

Description

Data Governance

Sections in each of the above on Security & Privacy

Given broad virtual participation and active Stakeholder involvement, execute the volumes in parallel

Too ambitious?

Let’s try and see what happens…

Plan: Volume Strategy


Plan implementation strategy

Objective: Enable Consistent Implementation of the DRM

Implementation Profiles

As-Is (RDBMS, Messaging, Portal Taxonomy, etc.)

XML Profile (Led by XML COP)

Semantic Technologies Profile (led by SiCOP)

Implementation Workshops and Pilots

Leverage Emerging Technology Workshops

Capture Implementation artifacts in a Core Metadata Registry

Several registry options…

Possibly Core.gov (if it satisfies the group’s requirements)

Build capacity of agencies to manage data

Work with universities

Vendor participation and support of DRM (i.e. “DRM-Ready” products)

Plan: Implementation Strategy


Fea drm success strategy

Plan: XML Profile of the DRM

Context

Service Context

Security Context

Subject Context

XML Topic Map

& OWL Lite

Web Service

Entry (UDDI)

IC Information

Security Marking

XLINK

Who

When

What

Why

Where

Sharing

Information Exchange

Information Access

Federated Query

& RSS

“Message” XMLSchemas

XLINK

Description

Data Element Description

Resource Description

Structured

DOD

Discovery

Medata Spec

Semi-Structured

Core XML Schema

Types

Unstructured

XLINK


Plan metrics and feedback loop

Principle: “What is Measured, Improves.”

Separate part of site and group dedicated to quantifiable metrics.

Some suggestions:

# of organizations implementing the DRM

Measure: Formal Data Management programs

# of products that are “DRM-Ready”

# of artifacts in a Core Registry

# of cross-domain exchanges

Caution: Outcomes versus Actions

Business group will also develop metrics for concrete outcomes

Plan: Metrics and Feedback Loop


Plan applying the drm non normative

Plan: Applying the DRM (non-normative)

Core Context

COI Context

Exchange

packages

Data

Elems

Data

Elems

Registry

Org 2

Org 1

Context

Sharing

Description


Strawman schedule milestones

NOTES:

NOTE1: Schedule is for Initial Suggestion ONLY – this WILL change after vetting/discussion in initial team meetings.

NOTE2: Progress will be transparent.

NOTE3: YOU can influence (read “speed up”) the schedule

4/2005 – Selection of Volume Leads and Multiple Editors.

Start the nominations NOW!

(Volume Leads – Government only, Volume Editors – Government or Contractor). “It’s all about Expertise”

8/2005 -- DRM Volume 1.1

(Volume Lead: Michael Daconta, Editors: Michael Daconta & ??? & ???)

2/2006 -- Initial Drafts Volume 2,3,4

8/2006 – Initial Drafts Implementation Profiles

2/2007 – Volumes 2,3,4 Complete

8/2007 – Implementation Profiles Complete

Strawman: Schedule/Milestones


How you can help

All: Get in your DRM Comments!

Stakeholders – participate on a team!

Note: only 1 “working” representative per organization.

Stakeholders MUST have “skin in the game.” i.e. willing to work and willing to implement.

Vendors – participate virtually (or as part of the team if sponsored by a stakeholder).

Whitepapers

“DRM-Ready” products (goal: certification)

Comment on this Success Strategy

Email: [email protected]

How you can help!


  • Login