1 / 15

ESPON Seminar Krakow, Poland 29-30/11/2011

This seminar focuses on the challenges and opportunities in cross-border polycentric metropolitan regions. It discusses the spatial setting and the importance of metropolitan quality, as well as the barriers and policies for enhanced cross-border cooperation. The seminar also highlights the political follow-up and activities towards developing an EGTC within the Greater Region.

landgraf
Download Presentation

ESPON Seminar Krakow, Poland 29-30/11/2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ESPON Seminar Krakow, Poland 29-30/11/2011 METROBORDER Cross-border polycentric metropolitan regions Tobias Chilla, University of Luxembourg

  2. 1. Metroborder – the project background ESPON programme CU Coordination Unit MC Monitoring Committee Stakeholder Researcher ‘unofficialstakeholder’

  3. 2. The spatial setting • Cross-BorderPolycentricMetropolitanRegions‘ (CBPMR) • Wherearethey? • Whatistheirposition? • Howcantheirgovernancebeimproved? • ... • (Project lifetime: • 2009-2010)

  4. 2. The spatial setting

  5. 2. The spatial setting • Metropolitanquality: • Cross-borderlocationdoes not hindermetropolitanquality • Somecross-bordermetropolitanregionsarecomparabletodomesticmetropolises

  6. 3. Cross-border governance

  7. 3. Cross-border governance • Multi-level challenges: • Whom to involve and how • If and how to delegatecompetences to cross-border institutions (e.g. EGTC) • Multi-levelmismatch • Perimeter

  8. 3. Cross-border governance B D B F L F right: core spaces for increased cross-border cooperation (Delphi study, differentiated for the national backgrounds of the responding experts) left: cross-border institutions and their perimeter within the Greater Region

  9. 3. Cross-border governance The five most important barriers for an enhanced cross-border cooperation in both case study regions (Delphi study)

  10. 3. Cross-border governance The most relevant policies for increased cross-border cooperation (Delphi Study)

  11. Bruxelles 4. Political conclusions? Lille Aachen-Liège-Maastricht B D Rhein/ Main L Functional Urban Areas Lux. Lux. Core FUA Trier Arlon Neighbouring FUA Kaiserslautern Thionville Surrounding FUA Metz F Saarbrücken Main Institutional focus CBPMR Central CBPMR Cities Nancy NeighbouringCBPMRs Neighbouring domestic metropolises Strasbourg Metropolitan Corridors

  12. 4. Political follow-up • Developing an EGTC within the Greater Region – development options • “Economic metropolis” • “Laboratory of Europe” • “Mobile and accessible region”

  13. 4. Political activity and follow-up e.g. Joint presentation of Upper Rhine and Greater Region on the Open Days (BXL, October 2010) Source: http://www.oberrheinkonferenz.org/fr/actualites/2010/, modified

  14. 4. Political activity and follow-up e.g. Joint Declaration of the Summit of the Greater Region July 2011

  15. ESPON Seminar Krakow, Poland 29-30/11/2011 METROBORDER Cross-border polycentric metropolitan regions Tobias Chilla, University of Luxembourg

More Related