1 / 39

Wetland Biotopes: Hydrologic conditions, vegetation zonation and succession

Wetland Biotopes: Hydrologic conditions, vegetation zonation and succession. Keith Edwards B259 kredwards59@yahoo.com. Wetland Hydrology. Wetlands – transitional between terrestrial and open water ecosystems Are ecotonal systems Wetland biotopes – determined mostly by hydrology

landen
Download Presentation

Wetland Biotopes: Hydrologic conditions, vegetation zonation and succession

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Wetland Biotopes: Hydrologic conditions, vegetation zonation and succession Keith Edwards B259 kredwards59@yahoo.com

  2. Wetland Hydrology • Wetlands – transitional between terrestrial and open water ecosystems • Are ecotonal systems • Wetland biotopes – determined mostly by hydrology - Source (precipitation, groundwater, surface water) - Water Depth - Flow rate and patterns - Flooding frequency and duration (pulses) • Hydrology – probably most important factor for wetland establishment and maintenance

  3. HYDROLOGY Modifies and determines Climate Physicochemical Environment Basin Geomorphology Allows specific Biota Mitsch and Gosselink, 2000

  4. Hydrology: Influences chemical and physical traits of wetlands - which influences plant species composition BUT: plants affect hydrology – ET, retarding flow rate Feedbacks

  5. Slavošovice CW Water Velocity – Holcova, 2006 4 August 2005 (48 hours after) 1 December 2005 (30 hours after) 5 August 2005 (72 hours after) 2 December 2005 (46 hours after)

  6. 7 August 2005 (120 hours after) 4 December (104 hours after) 9 August 2005 (168 hours after) 6 December (142 hours after)

  7. Hydrologic Effects • Due to periodic flooding: - wetlands lower species diversity than uplands - waterlogged soils – low O2 levels – other chemical traits different from uplands - requires plant adaptations - only small % of all vascular plants have evolved such adaptations - wetlands have unique flora with low diversity

  8. Hydrologic conditions affect biotope type - Longer flooding duration – lower species diversity - Greater fluctuation in flooding / water level – more heterogeneous habitat – more niches available – more species able to establish (lake/pond shores, riparian) - Flowing waters – increases erosion / sediment deposition rates – more heterogeneity - Coastal wetlands – low diversity – double stress of flooding and salinity

  9. Wetland hydroperiod – seasonal water level pattern – rise and fall of water in a wetland: Examples: permanently flooded; seasonally flooded; saturated; temporarily flooded… • Degree of fluctuations – can help maintain particular biotopes – constancy of pattern year to year provides stability to wetland • Hydroperiod – integrates all inflows and outflows - influenced by physical terrain and distance to other water bodies

  10. Production – affected by openness of wetland systems to hydrological fluxes: - systems with greater water flow through have higher NPP (but not always for marshes) - generally higher flow through means greater nutrient and energy inputs • Within-wetland variation in water level fluctuations: - produces environmental gradients that influence species distribution – plant zonation

  11. Species change across space and time (succession) • Affected by: - internal factors (competition, facilitation, peat accumulation, etc.) – autochthonous - external factors (disturbance, hydrology, climate change, etc.) - allochthonous

  12. Plant distribution / zonation • Originally thought due to successional processes – example: mangroves • Now – numerous models of plant change / zonation in wetlands

  13. Hydrarch Model • Wetlands intermediate stage between purely aquatic to purely terrestrial climax community • Follows Clements’ ideas of succession and community development: - Vegetation occurs as recognizable groups of species - Autogenic processes most important - Linear sequence of stages ending in a very stable, mature climax stage

  14. Many wetlands are ecotonal – accumulate OM from plant matter and trap sediments – autochthonous factors • BUT – wetlands also subject to allochthonous factors - Even if current upland stage on former wetlands does not mean change was due to autochthonous factors – must be tested

  15. Now – hydrarch model considered to be only partly correct: - OM accumulation self-limiting process – rate decreases as wetland becomes drier – result in drier wetland biotope but not necessarily an upland community - External factors can affect hydrology - Northern peatlands likely exception – more direct control over hydrology – but may not change over time into uplands (paludification) - Lakes / ponds – some upland forests do occur on former wetlands – but again not clear if due to autochthonous factors – ex. INDU wetlands

  16. INDU Ponds • Cowles (1899, 1901) and Shelford (1911) – first studied area • Ponds – formed by glacial action – of differing ages from inland to edge of Lake Michigan • Found young ponds deepest, dominated by aquatic plants • Older ponds – shallower with emergent vegetation • Oldest – little or no standing water – drier wetland systems or upland communities • Thought represented successional sequence

  17. INDU Ponds • Later studies – 1980’s, 1990’s • Wilcox and Simonen (1987): - same plant species sequence found (youngest to oldest) - studied pollen and macrofossil record in sediment cores of one pond – whether similar sequence over time - older than 150 years BP – diverse grouping of aquatic, emergent and floating species - 150 years BP to now – rapid species change due to European settlement and industrialization

  18. Singer (1996): - pollen and macrofossil record in pond - compared to regional terrestrial pollen record – record of long-term regional climate change - Pond vegetation mirrored changes in terrestrial pollen record - Concluded – changes in pond vegetation due more to regional climate changes than autochthonous factors

  19. Plant species changes in wetlands: - interaction between autochthonous and allochthonous factors • Successional theory – lakes and wetlands considered to be “immature” ecosystems – higher production than respiration rates • However – wetlands are detrital-based systems – is trait of “mature” ecosystems • Wetlands have traits of both “immature” and “mature” systems

  20. Trade-offs • Grime’s CSR model – plants grouped by life history traits, and response to stress and disturbance • Predict where species fall along stress and disturbance gradients: - Menges and Waller (1983) plant distribution in riparian wetlands related to flooding frequency and plant physiological traits

  21. Basis – plants require same types of resources: - Light - Water - Nutrients - Space • Fundamental niches of species overlap at rich end of nutrient gradient Some species better competitors – others better able to tolerate stress A B C D E F Trade-off in allocation of fixed carbon Resources

  22. Better competitors – found in nutrient-rich, less stressful areas • Actual distribution of plants along gradient – realized niche A B C D E F Poorer competitors – better stress tolerators – found in poorer quality habitats Resources Real wetlands – need to test that competition / stress tolerance main factors influencing plant distribution

  23. Centrifugal Organization Model • Expanded CSR model • Wisheu and Keddy (1992): - Multiple gradients in wetlands - Benign ends of all gradients – core habitats – dominated by better competitors – lower species diversity - More adverse conditions – dominated by species with adaptations to particular stress / disturbance - Species diversity – hump-backed curve – highest in mid parts of gradients – but biomass greater in core habitat

  24. Freshwater Wetlands, North America

  25. Model predictions: - Rare species restricted to peripheral habitats - Moore et al (1989) - North American wetlands – found rare species were restricted to infertile, peripheral sites - Eutrophication – shift species composition towards that of core habitat – favor more competitive species – removal of peripheral habitats – decreased species diversity

  26. Assembly Rules / Environmental Sieve Models • Assembly Rules (functional guilds): - Plant species placed into groups based on functional traits - Keddy (2000) – clustered 43 wetland species into 7 groups – fall along life history and growth forms in relation to light levels - Traits used to predict presence and response of plants to an important environmental factor (filter) - Filters – environmental conditions that restrict species pool - Can predict which plant traits prevent establishment / presence of particular species - Predict changes in species composition as environment changes

  27. Environmental Sieve Model (van der Valk, 1981): - Gleasonian approach – continuum model - Developed to explain plant composition in prairie potholes under flooded and drained conditions - Prairie potholes – shallow depressional wetlands in mid- continental North America – typified by fluctuating water levels - Model – three life history traits; - life span (annual, short-lived or long-lived perennials) - propagule longevity – how long reproductive parts viable and available (persistent, forming a seed bank or short-lived but easily dispersed) - plant establishment requirements (require exposed soil – Type 1; can have standing water – type 2)

  28. 12 possible life history types Example: Phragmites – is a VD-1 (long-lived perennial, V; easily dispersed, short-lived seeds, D; requires exposed soil to germinate -1)

  29. - As environmental sieves change – other life history types favored: - long-term flooded wetlands – few or no annuals - S species favored – form seed banks - long-lived perennials persist - Sieve model: - qualitative model- predicts species presence but not amount - ignores autogenic factors

  30. - Easily incorporate other environmental factors: - include fire frequency to predict change in species composition of depressional swamps in southeast US - swamps frequently drawn down – then more susceptible to fire - high fire frequency – results in grass / sedge meadows - intermediate fire frequency – hardwoods (maple) killed – end result is cypress (Taxodium ascendens) savannas - low fire frequency – mixed hardwood / cypress swamp

More Related