Download
1 / 36
360 likes | 457 Views
On k-Edge -magic Cubic Graphs. Sin-Min Lee , San Jose State University Hsin-hao Su *, Stonehill College Yung-Chin Wang , Tzu-Hui Institute of Technology 24th MCCCC At Illinois State University September 11, 2010. Supermagic Graphs.
E N D
On k-Edge-magic Cubic Graphs Sin-Min Lee, San Jose State University Hsin-hao Su*, Stonehill College Yung-Chin Wang, Tzu-Hui Institute of Technology 24th MCCCC At Illinois State University September 11, 2010
Supermagic Graphs For a (p,q)-graph, in 1966, Stewart defined that a graph labeling is supermagic iff the edges are labeled 1, 2, 3, …, q so that the vertex sums are a constant.
k-Edge-Magic Graphs A (p,q)-graph G is called k-edge-magic (in short k-EM) if there is an edge labeling l: E(G) {k, k+1, …, k+q-1} such that for each vertex v, the sum of the labels of the edges incident with v are all equal to the same constant modulo p; i.e., l+(v) = c for some fixed c in Zp. If k =1, then G is said to be edge-magic.
Examples: 1-Edge-Magic • The following maximal outerplanar graphs with 6 vertices are 1-EM.
Examples: 1-Edge-Magic • In general, G may admits more than one labeling to become a k-edge-magic graph with different vertex sums.
Examples: k-Edge-Magic • In general, G may admits more than one labeling to become a k-edge-magic graph.
Necessary Condition A necessary condition for a (p,q)-graph G to be k-edge-magic is Proof: The sum of all edges is Every edge is counted twice in the vertex sums.
k-Edge-Magic is periodic • Theorem:If a (p,q)-graph G is k-edge-magic then it is pt+k-edge-magic for all t ≥ 0 .
Cubic Graphs • Definition:3-regular (p,q)-graph is called a cubic graph. • The relationship between p and q is • Since q is an integer, p must be even.
One for All Theorem: If a cubic graph is k-edge-magic, then it is k-edge-magic for all k. Proof: Since every vertex is of degree 3, by adding or subtracting 1 to each adjacent edge, the vertex sum remains the same.
Examples: Complete Bipartite • The complete bipartite graph K3,3 is k-edge-magic for all k.
Not Order 4s Theorem: A cubic graph with order 4s is not k-edge-magic for all k. Proof: The number of edges is 6s. The necessary condition implies It is impossible for all k.
Möbius Ladders The concept of Möbius ladder was introduced by Guy and Harry in 1967. It is a cubiccirculant graph with an even numbern of vertices, formed from an n-cycle by adding edges (called “rungs”) connecting opposite pairs of vertices in the cycle.
Möbius Ladders A möbius ladder ML(2n) with the vertices denoted by a1, a2, …, a2n. The edges are then {a1, a2}, {a2, a3}, … {a2n, a1}, {a1, an+1}, {a2, an+2}, … , {an, a2n}.
Labeling Idea Splits all edges into two subsets. The first subset contains all the edges of C2n. The second set contains all middle edges, which forms a perfect matching. Construct a graceful labeling for the first subset, i.e., an arithmetic progression. The rest numbers also form an arithmetic progression.
Labeling Method 1 Divides the numbers into three subsets: {0, 1, 2, 3, …, 2k = n-1}, {2n, 2n+1, 2n+2, 2n+3, …, 2n+2k = 3n-1}, {n, n+1, n+2, n+3, …, n+2k = 2n-1}. Use the first two subsets to label C2n by the following sequence: k+1, 1, k+2, 2, k+3, 3, …, 2k, k, 0, k+1, 1, k+2, 2, k+3, 3, …, 2k, k, 0.
Labeling Method 2 We label the edges by 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, …, k+1, k+1, n+k+2, k+2, n+k+3, k+3, …, 2n, 2k+1. Label the rest numbers, k+2, k+3, …, n+k+1 to the edges in the middle.
Cylinder Graphs • Theorem (Lee, Pigg, Cox; 1994): The cylinder graph CnxP2 is a 1-edge-magic graph if n is odd.
Generalized Petersen Graphs • The generalized Petersen graphs P(n,k) were first studied by Bannai and Coxeter. • P(n,k) is the graph with vertices {vi, ui : 0 ≤i≤n-1} and edges {vivi+1, viui, uiui+k}, where subscripts modulo n and k. • Theorem: The generalized Petersen graph P(n,t) is a k-edge-magic graph for all k if n is odd.
Order 6 Theorem: A cubic graph with order 6 is k-edge-magic for all k.
Conjecture Conjecture: A cubic graph with order 4s+2 is k-edge-magic for all k. With the previous examples, this is a reasonable extension of a conjecture by Lee, Pigg, Cox in 1994.
Mod(m)-Edge-Magic Graphs A (p,q)-graph G is called Mod(m)-edge-magic (in short Mod(m)-EM) if there is an edge labeling l: E(G) {1,2,…,q} such that for each vertex v, the sum of the labels of the edges incident with v are all equal to the same constant modulo m; i.e., l+(v) = c for some fixed c in Zm.
Relationship between EM Theorem: For a graph with order p, if it is 1-edge-magic, then it is mod(m)-edge-magic for m to be a factor of p. Proof: Since m is a factor of p, the constant sum in Zp remains constant in Zm.
Proof Since it is mod(5)-edge-magic, we have relations as followings: a + b = l + m, (1) b + c = k + l, (2) h + i = f + e, (3) From relations (1) and (2), we have a + k = c + m. (4)
Proof (continued) Therefore we have g = d. Then we have a new relation h + f = i + e. (5) From relations (3) and (5), we have i = f. Then we have h = e, and g = j = d.
Proof (continued) Without losing generality, we say d = 0, e = 1 and f = 4. From relation (4), we have a = 1, k = 4, c = 2, m = 3 or a = 1, k = 4, c = 3, m = 2 or a = 2, k = 3, c = 1, m = 4 or a = 2, k = 3, c = 4, m = 1. Here, we already run out of 1 and 4 and only 2 and 3 left in the set.
Proof (continued) For the case a = 1, we have b = 2 and n = 2. If forces that o = 3 and l = 3. But m = 3 or 2 can’t make the sum on v9 equal to 0. This is a contradiction. With the same argument, we can show that all the possibilities can’t be true. Therefore it is not mod(5)-edge-magic.
Future Problems Do we have just a few counterexamples? Any better necessary condition? Possible sufficient conditions?
