Impact and Learning

1. Evaluation of Research Impact: Options and Challenges 18 October 2012 Simon Batchelor (IDS & Gamos) Impact and Learning

2. Issues to raise • Boundaries and responsibilities of Researchers • Theory of Change • Policy change? • Farmer/User change? • Methods – my three favourites • Actor networks • Qualitative Document Analysis • Delphic • One that I remain unsure about? • If time – two last points

3. Boundaries • Where does the responsibility of researchers end? • Different types of research • Engagement during the research • “a need to engage with a representative sample of the end users to ensure that new hybrids or practices fit the ‘real world’ farming systems”. • “there are the actors at the boundary of the research who might take the research forward. At some point research that has led to successful product development will need to go to scale”. • Stakeholder maps and communication strategies • Helped by a Theory of Change

4. Theory of Change • Isobel in the room.  • Complexity, Process, linear logic models • It is possible to move away from a linear logic model and present a ‘Theory of Change’ in a nonlinear way. • This also moves away from the idea of an impact pathway to, let’s say, an impact landscape. • For instance, A discussion paper by Hivos (Guijt and Retolaza, 2012) view the Theory of Change as involving dimensions of change and identify the following 5 dimensions: • 1) The actors (individuals or groups) who are trying to bring about change; • 2) The context or situation that influences the actors and which they are trying to change; • 3) The ideas or theories that influence the actors when they consider how to act in a certain situation; • 4) The strategic plan that describes the reasons and provides a framework for taking particular action; and • 5) The reflection and decision-­‐making processes that help actors to develop strategy, review success and failure and make improvements to ideas and strategies.

5. HIVOS Dimensions for a Theory of ChangeReproduced from Guijt and Retolaza, (2012)

6. Policy Change • Emphasis of Theories of Change should be on the Causal mechanisms. • We use Steven Framework • Steven, D. (2007) ‘Evaluation and the New Public Diplomacy’, presentation to the Future of Public Diplomacy, 842nd Wilton Park Conference, River Path Associates • Changing perceptions and public opinion; • Setting an agenda by reframing the way an issue is debated and creating pressure for change • Building networks that support delivery of change; • Role of Champions • Developing capacity within organisations to allow them to understand and respond to an issue; • Changing institutions, for example influencing strategy and resource allocations within organisations (often government, but may be private sector).

7. What about widgets? • Different types of research • Farmer extension • Private Sector engagement • Pro-poor research, para- poor research, per- poor research • Blatant self promotion – Changing the Financial Landscape of Africa Batchelor S, IDS Bulletin Volume 43 Number 5 September 2012

8. Methods? My 3 Favourite • Actor networks • Social network analysis (if time the story of Catia) • Netmapping (Power cube) • Qualitative Document Analysis • New media challenges • Delphic consultation • User surveys • Engage to activate • Not sure yet about Sensemaker? • Any experience in the room?

9. Two last points • Learning!!!!!!!!! • Difference between Research communication and Intermediary Work

10. Example of QDA analysis