1 / 12

PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES OF URBAN-RURAL PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT IN KALININGRAD REGION

VASAB 2010 BSR INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme « EAST-WEST WINDOW » 2007/132-845 Final conference St.-Petersburg, 21 October 2008. PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES OF URBAN-RURAL PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT IN KALININGRAD REGION by Natalia Klimenko.

laith-carpenter
Download Presentation

PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES OF URBAN-RURAL PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT IN KALININGRAD REGION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. VASAB 2010BSR INTERREG III B Neighbourhood Programme«EAST-WEST WINDOW» 2007/132-845Final conference St.-Petersburg, 21 October 2008 PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES OF URBAN-RURAL PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT IN KALININGRAD REGION by Natalia Klimenko

  2. Urban-rural partnership environment in Kaliningrad region • Significant scientific heritage on urban-rural relations * Urban-rural relations concepts: • Agri-industrial space (‘‘Agropromyshlennaya’’ sreda) (Zaslavskaya, 1975) • Colonising space (‘‘Preodoleniye’’) (Valeev, 1986) • Urban-style modernisation (‘‘Dogonyayuschaya [gorod] modernizatsiya’’) (Vishnevsky, 1998) • Multifaceted village (‘‘Mnogolikaya derevnya’’) (Alexeev, 1990) • New agri-rural space (‘‘Prostranstvo agroukladov’’) (Nefedova, 2003) • ‘‘Stranger’’ peasants (‘‘Postoronniye krestyane’’) (Ekhalov, 1999) * Urban-rural relations = perspective development of big cities *Agricultural determinism

  3. Urban-rural partnership environment in Kaliningrad region 2. UR relations rather than UR partnership * UR relation logistics: • Pendulummigrations of rural labour force to the city and contrarily (more rare) • Urban resident recreation in the countryside • Conurbation associated with housing in he suburb * UR cooperation do not contribute to UR partnership: • Lack of knowledge about the content of UR partnership • Lack of “best practice” experience • Low initiative of local and regional authorities

  4. Urban-rural partnership environment in Kaliningrad region 3. Development of inter-municipal cooperation * A new phenomena in Russia 1980-1990s – development of the institute of the local self government * Political context of municipal associations

  5. Urban-rural partnership environment in Kaliningrad region • Reformation of spatial structure of local self government * Settlements (populated locality) have no instance of authority * Invalid status of almost all urban districts * Inefficient municipal administration • Current structure of the local self government: • Urban districts – 19 • Municipal areas – 3, including 5 urban settlements and 11 rural settlements

  6. Urban-rural partnership environment in Kaliningrad region 5. Agricultural determinism of rural areas functions in the context of systemic crisis of agricultural sector * Spontaneous diversification of rural areas functions • Industry development • House building • Location of municipal infrastructure • tourism

  7. Urban-rural partnership environment in Kaliningrad region • Active participation of Kaliningrad region in cross-border cooperation * A member of 5 of 8 euroregions with participation of regions of Russia “Baltic” “Saule” “Neman” “Sheshupe” “Lyna-Lava” * Addition development opportunities due to new knowledge and experience

  8. Recommendation for introduction of UR partnership in Kaliningrad region 1. Completion of the reform of local self government

  9. Recommendation for introduction of UR partnership in Kaliningrad region • Development of territorial planning and inter-municipal cooperation as a basis of UR partnership • Introduction of “economic” or “management” kinds of municipal associations * Broadening of Associations of municipalities of Kaliningrad region functioning • Introduction of UR partnership to regional strategy of agro-industrial sector development * Agro-business development

  10. Recommendation for introduction of UR partnership in Kaliningrad region 5. Diversification of rural area functions in the context of UR partnership development * Establishment of local industrial zones: - manufacture and assembly of complex home appliance - textile manufacture - innovative manufacture - woodworking and manufacture of furniture - building industry - food manufacture 6. UR networking development in the field of conurbation regulation * Harmonization inter-municipal spatial policy

  11. Recommendation for introduction of UR partnership in Kaliningrad region 7. Delegation of greater power on management of recreation areas development from federal, regional level to the municipal one 8. Development of cross-border cooperation with neighbouring countries * development of transport-logistic complex * development of tourism and recreation infrastructure * agro-industrial cooperation * international marketing 9. Development of inter-municipal cultural exchange

  12. Recommendation for introduction of UR partnership in Kaliningrad region 10. Enhancement of public service accessibility for the population

More Related