Indivisible or intersecting
Download
1 / 15

Indivisible or Intersecting? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 94 Views
  • Uploaded on

Indivisible or Intersecting?. A Cross Institutional View of Active Learning. Paul Wright Faculty of Technology, Southampton Solent University, SOUTHAMPTON, UK. [email protected] Wendelin Romer Centre for Active Learning, University of Gloucestershire, CHELTENHAM, UK

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Indivisible or Intersecting?' - lainey


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Indivisible or intersecting

Indivisible or Intersecting?

A Cross Institutional View of Active Learning

Paul Wright

Faculty of Technology,

Southampton Solent University,

SOUTHAMPTON, UK.

[email protected]

WendelinRomer

Centre for Active Learning,

University of Gloucestershire,

CHELTENHAM, UK

[email protected]


Contents
Contents

  • Active Learning – a brief introduction

  • The Project

  • Findings from one aspect of the research

  • Comparing two ‘models’

  • A serendipitous story


But first this
But first......this:

  • Take the 3 post-it notes and, one definition/word/phrase per post it, write down:

    The three things that best define Active Learning for you.......


Introduction
Introduction

  • The term ‘active learning’ (AL) is often used intuitively rather than with a common understanding (Bonwell and Eison, 1991).

  • The link between ‘doing’ and ‘learning’ is often identified within the Confucian aphorism ‘I see, I forget; I hear, I remember; I do, I understand’ (Beard, 2008).

  • Such an approach has spawned a range of ‘active’ pedagogies, often termed ‘discovery learning’ (Mayer, 2004), often as a rail against lecturing (Bonwell and Eison, 1991).

  • Recent critiques of discovery learning have questioned its efficacy, especially those which exhibit minimal instruction (e.g. Mayer, 2004; Kirschner et al., 2006).

  • Mayer (2004) and the ‘constructivist teaching fallacy’

  • Range of literature relating teachers’ approaches to teaching and the links between learning outcomes and teaching activities (e.g. Ramsden, 1992; Prosser & Trigwell, 1999; Biggs, 2003)


Potted highlights of my al experience
Potted highlights of my AL experience

  • As a student:

    • Non-plussed in the lab!

    • Too little time, too much activity?

  • As a teacher:

    • Reinventing my own experience

    • COZIP – AL is ‘learning by doing’....what evidence did we have?


The project methodology
The Project Methodology

  • The initial questionnaire

    • Longevity of and confidence in use

    • Examples of practice

    • Locus of support

    • Definition of AL

  • Follow up interviews

    • SQUIN (Wengraf, 2001)

    • Gestalt questioning methodology (Holloway & Jefferson, 2000)


Initial thoughts
Initial thoughts

  • We found three ‘families’ of conceptions

  • EXTERNAL

  • The physicality of ‘doing’

  • Methods/Modes of activity

  • Communication with each other

  • Sense of ‘practice’

  • INTERNAL

  • Cognitive processing

  • Reflection

  • Increasing maturity

  • Taking responsibility

  • HOLISTIC

  • Meld these internal and external worlds.

  • Engagement

  • Development

  • Creativity

  • Investigation.

  • With a partner, try and sort your own definitions into these groups and return them to the front



Testing the models
Testing the models

INTERNAL

EXTERNAL

HOLISTIC


Testing the models1
Testing the models

INTERNAL

EXTERNAL

HOLISTIC


Some tentative conclusions
Some tentative conclusions

  • All respondents identified conceptions that suggest that they believe student passivity does not promote learning.

  • Ongoing debate about what this passive/active dimension looks like in class. Different teachers view student activity differently.

  • This does not help us form a concrete definition of AL, except to say that it is clearer to define what it is not, rather than what it is!

  • So do our students have a clue what’s going on?

  • What good practice can be shared between teachers who see AL differently?

  • How do these two ‘worlds’ of doing and thinking meet? Is this fixed or do approaches vary in time and context?


Return to the text
Return to the text

To listen and yet it is easy to forget

To see/perceive and yet it is easy to remember/record

To be/act as and yet it is easy to understand


New insights
New insights?

  • Not just ‘doing’, but ‘being’

  • Sense of ‘embodiment’, and ‘thinking as’

  • No sense of first two lines being used negatively

  • The final character contains the ‘heart radical’ – mind and heart


Thoughts so far
Thoughts so far

  • We can identify a range of conceptions that teachers hold, concerning AL

  • By and large, an individual views AL as a complex mix of the physical and cognitive

  • It is not just ‘learning by doing’, and, in fact, it NEVER was!

  • The need to introduce practice that promotes self-reflection and internalisation of learning


“One's action ought to come out of an achieved stillness: not to be a mere rushing on..”

D. H. Lawrence


ad