1 / 12

Water Allocations in the South Saskatchewan River Basin

Water Allocations in the South Saskatchewan River Basin. SSRB area. Source: “ Some SSRB info and Approved SSRB Water Management Plan Implementation Project, ” Alberta Environment. SSRB River Basins.

Download Presentation

Water Allocations in the South Saskatchewan River Basin

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Water Allocations in the South Saskatchewan River Basin

  2. SSRB area Source: “Some SSRB info and Approved SSRB Water Management Plan Implementation Project,” Alberta Environment

  3. SSRB River Basins Source: “Some SSRB info and Approved SSRB Water Management Plan Implementation Project,” Alberta Environment

  4. Current Allocation method “FITFIR” “First in time, first in right” Oldest water licenses get priority over newest Oldest licenses are the largest Municipalities often have the oldest licenses Licenses rarely sequential geographically Source: “Some SSRB info and Approved SSRB Water Management Plan Implementation Project,” Alberta Environment

  5. Problems All four river basins are oversubscribed. Two river basins have experienced degraded environmental conditions by not meeting Instream Flow Needs (IFN). Large amounts of water have to be moved between river basins to meet demand and agreements with Saskatchewan. Economists believe FITFIR is not “economically” efficient. Source: “Some SSRB info and Approved SSRB Water Management Plan Implementation Project,” Alberta Environment

  6. High Excludability Private Goods Toll Goods Low Subtractability High Subtractability limited access CPR Public Goods Common Pool Resources Low Excludability Goods Source: Adapted from Ostrom, Elinor (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ, U.S.A.

  7. Proposed solutions 1) Free market approach based on Murray-Darling River Basin in Australia (new Water Act) 2) Leave existing Water Act intact, but increase Water Conservation Objectives (WCOs) and clawbacks on transfers 3) Community-based management/localized decision-making (minor changes to Water Act)

  8. Issues Market-based approaches ignore water is a common pool resource, not a private good. Murray-Darling River Basin had severe environmental degradation during droughts. Economists’ reports are overly optimistic? Not a lot of political support for community-based management, but a lot of political support for market-based approaches.

  9. Proposed Modeling Need to compare predicted outcomes against each other on the same playing field. Use Institutional Analysis and Development framework to develop the rules based on the proposed solutions. Test if conditions such as IFN are met. Test economic outcomes.

  10. Proposed Modeling Likely choice would be agent based modeling, using the rules developing through IAD examination of the proposed solutions. Model has to be able to handle both sequential and simultaneous deterministic and stochastic events and outcomes. Localized failures can affect downstream agents.

  11. Parameters Volume of water licenses Geographic location of water licenses Priority numbers of water licenses Inter-provincial and international water agreements Inter-river basin transfers Naturalized flow and natural recharges

  12. Variables Rainfall Price of oil Price of selling water license Price of short term transfer of water license Population growth IFN/WCO levels

More Related