1 / 26

Waskesiu Local Governance

Waskesiu Local Governance. Council Overview. Consultation Process. First of several communications Purpose: To inform constituents –local governance; to receive feedback Dealing with major principles; not details at this time Working with PCA and stakeholder groups. MOU – Basic Principles.

Download Presentation

Waskesiu Local Governance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Waskesiu Local Governance Council Overview

  2. Consultation Process • First of several communications • Purpose: To inform constituents –local governance; to receive feedback • Dealing with major principles; not details at this time • Working with PCA and stakeholder groups

  3. MOU – Basic Principles • Value the character and nature of the community • Local participation in community management • Appropriate and affordable levels of services to residents and visitors • Waskesiu-a national park community • Protect cultural and natural resources • Shared vision for future management

  4. MOU Limitations • WCC totally dependent on Parks for funding – operating and capital • No revenue generating capacity • No ability to pass bylaws • No capacity to deal with public concerns except through influence on PCA • No capacity to initiate programs – recreation

  5. Sutter Report Conclusions(1) • Municipal status – burden of governance – accountability • Terms and conditions of incorporation agreement critical to success • Contractual arrangements for services • Waskesiu can operate successfully as a municipality • Public consultations – important to success

  6. Sutter Report Conclusions (2) • Municipal status allows for local priorities and local control of destiny • Federal cutbacks have impacted on infrastructure • Municipal status mutually beneficial to Waskesiu and PCA • Council accountable for its actions; year round commitment • Can unite a community under common values or mire in politics

  7. Sutter Report Conclusions (3) • Projected costs to taxpayers – based on reports assumptions: • Cabins - $565-$831 • Cottages - $400 - $1700 • Small businesses - $1,000 - $1400 • Large businesses – newer - $13,000 - $30,000 Notes: Includes capital program of $2.5 million; assumes current debt elimination; no market adjustment in assessed values; less than projected lease and license revenues from Park

  8. Sutter Report Conclusions (4) • Budget Estimates – Municipal - $704,780, including $266,000 for capital works • Results in mill rate of 8.2 mills, 5.2 excluding capital program • Revenue Sources: NowProjected Cabin 135,300 311,600 Cottage 156,500 125,460 Business 229,800 181,220 Other 91,000 **Estimates only; will change with detailed negotiations; market adjustment factor?

  9. Sutter Report Conclusions (5) • Utilities Costs – Water, sewer and garbage – Projected Costs - $288,400 • Paid through Fees NowProjected Water 163,800 167,200 Sewer 78,000 82,300 Garbage 38,900 38,900 **PCA currently pays 1/3 of utilities costs – included in numbers above; cost-sharing agreement to be negotiated

  10. Issues • Council has identified several major issues to be addressed • Begin with concepts and principles • Then negotiate details

  11. Townsite • No changes proposed to townsite boundaries • Includes golf course, Kapasiwin, maintenance compound • Excludes marina

  12. Land and Assets • PCA to transfer assets for nominal sum of $1. • Land titles remain with PCA but use of land by municipality through leases or other agreements • Equipment, tools, inventory and perhaps buildings – municipal ownership • PCA – pay for environmental assessments and remediation on all land tranfers

  13. Land Rent system - Now • Land rent based on appraised land value at fixed point in time • Amount = % times appraised value • Several options available • New appraisals when leases renewed • Revenues accrue to Parks Canada to be used at its discretion • Cabins – camping permits to be replaced by leases

  14. Municipal Tax System • Taxes based on municipal requirements • Applied to land and improvements • Amount = mill rate times taxable assessment • Funds accrue to municipality; stay in Waskesiu • Reassessment occurs when changes made on property and provincial schedule

  15. Land Rent System - Future • No changes to lease terms except land rent • Land rent on all leases and Licenses of Occupation - $1 per annum • Municipality pays PCA an amount on behalf of lessees; e.g. Jasper - $330,000 • PCA administers leases and licenses • Land titles remain with PCA

  16. Capital Infrastructure • $8 million in planned capital projects, of which $4.31 million for utilities • Municipality to assume some responsibility for infrastructure costs • Currently, utility fees include debt repayment • Higher Federal standards PCA responsibility • Independent verification of estimates • Identify unplanned projects • Financial sustainability - critical

  17. Land Use Planning and Development • Most likely to remain with PCA • Release of cabin and cottage lots • Future of Montreal Drive complexes • Seasonal staff housing requirements • Constraints on commercial lot development • Community plan – Federal requirement with municipal input • Provincial legislation – need to address

  18. Parks Canada Financial Input • PILT -Applies to PCA land and improvements • One level of government does not tax another so PILT is mechanism • PILT - Typically, equivalent to municipal taxes • Currently pay 1/3 utility operating costs; pay fair share in future • Cost-sharing agreement? Recognize use by visitors and non-residents • Initial capital contribution; amount to be determined

  19. Governance • Provincial legislation is required • Must be joint request of PCA and community • Will seek legal advice • Information on Federal and Provincial agreements required

  20. Staffing • Could involve some current PCA staff • Currently costs determined by Federal collective agreements • Municipality have authority to hire or contract services • Could examine joint staffing with Elk Ridge for some things • Manage own affairs

  21. Bylaws • In Jasper, all municipal bylaws require Superintendent approvals • Has created unnecessary work • Bylaws that have environmental impact subject to Supt. Review • Others – at municipal discretion

  22. Transitional Funding • Required if decision is made to proceed • To be provided by PCA

  23. Sundry Items • Management of heritage buildings • Recreation facilities • Policing • Hazardous tree management • Wild life management • Trail maintenance within Waskesiu • Extended residence usage • Street lighting • Business licenses • Use of maintenance compound

  24. Community Benefits • Exercise more control over priorities • Ability to raise funds for community needs • Improved infrastructure • Clearer accountability for revenues raised • Tax revenues stay in community • More flexibility for joint ventures – Elk Ridge; Lobstick • Define Waskesiu community vision • Can accept tax-deductible donations from Foundation • Possible reduction in number of organizations • Deal with issues on a timely basis • Develop recreational and cultural programs

  25. Next Steps • Major stakeholder consultation – February - done • Analyze PCA response – and begin discussions - ongoing • Initial public meetings in March - done • Additional meetings and public information in April, May and June • Community referendum in July • Finalize negotiations with PCA if referendum passes • Final agreement presented to community before signing • Council elections in August, 2006 • Seek provincial legislation • Target date – municipality – January 1, 2008

  26. Major Considerations • Financial impact – who pays for what? • Financially viable and sustainable? • Control over expenditure increases? • Who establishes priorities? • Can a municipality deliver the services efficiently and effectively? • Responsive? • What is the long term vision for Waskesiu? • Accountability? • Joint ventures with Parks, Elk Ridge, Lobstick?

More Related