Topic selection and submission 1
Download
1 / 35

Topic Selection and Submission 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 55 Views
  • Uploaded on

Topic Selection and Submission 1. Caps 4360.18 Dr. Brian William Smith. Office Hours. Today 10-2 Tomorrow 11-2 Friday 10-12. Learning Outcomes Covered Today.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Topic Selection and Submission 1' - kyrie


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Topic selection and submission 1

Topic Selection and Submission 1

Caps 4360.18

Dr. Brian William Smith


Office hours
Office Hours

  • Today 10-2

  • Tomorrow 11-2

  • Friday 10-12


Learning outcomes covered today
Learning Outcomes Covered Today

  • Define an appropriate and current problem that is being actively discussed by real decision makers at a specific level of government.



Examples:

  • Social Problem

  • Immigration

  • Failing Public Schools

  • National Debt

  • Global Warming

  • Controversial Solution

  • Dream Act

  • Race to the Top

  • Fair Tax

  • Cap and Trade


A Good topic has a social problem, with a solution, and decision makers are actively trying to solve it


Topic proposals
Topic Proposals decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Due in Class on 1/28/2013

  • Paper must be typed

  • Be Ready to make some changes (for the better)


Do i have a good topic
Do I have a good topic? decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Clearly Identified Social Problem

  • Policy history on my topic

  • Legitimate Controversial Policy Solution

  • Pro and Con Sides


Submission 1
Submission 1 decision makers are actively trying to solve it


Submission one 10
Submission One – 10% decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Paper One consists of 2 parts:

  • Research Proposal (worksheet)

  • Annotated Bibliography


Research proposal
Research Proposal decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Worksheet.

  • Overview ONLY!

  • Do not go into depth.

  • Get the arguments right!

  • In prose form, this becomes the introduction to Submission Two.


Sub 1 annotated bibliography
Sub 1: Annotated Bibliography decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Basically a feasibility study

  • Requires 14 sources total, pro- and con-

  • Books, scholarly articles, legitimate websites and government resources

  • No “helper” sources (limited journalistic sources and magazines allowed, but NO Wikipedia, NO Taking Sides or Controversial Issues citations etc.)

  • Include: MLA Works Cited plus “annotations” (comments on each source’s authority, and on how you will use each source)

  • Due on February 13th


How many sources
How Many Sources decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • 14 Total

    • 7 for the Pro Side

    • 7 For the Con Side

  • These should be solid/authoritative sources


Good vs bad
Good vs. Bad decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Good

    • Scholarly journal articles

    • Government documents

    • Reputable newspapers

    • Webpages of influental groups

  • Bad

    • Wikipedia

    • Private Individuals with webpages

    • Non-influential groups

    • Trade publications (People, Esquire)


Annotation involves 2 things
Annotation involves 2 things decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Develop a standard MLA citation for each entry

  • Summarizing each source

    • Why it is credible

    • How it will contribute to your project


Recap
Recap decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Submission One = Annotated Bibliography + Research Proposal (worksheet)

  • Research Proposal is revised for the introduction to Submission Two and subsequent submissions.

    Save the information to put in your Research File


Capstone vocabulary

Talking the Talk, is just as important as walking the walk decision makers are actively trying to solve it

Capstone vocabulary


Topic question the title of your project and your papers
TOPIC QUESTION decision makers are actively trying to solve itThe title of your project (and your papers)

  • Concern about what should be done about a specific social problem (i.e., a normative question)

  • Answers imply a policy, so be specific

  • Lets use a hypothetical:

    Should the Federal Government approve the Keystone pipeline?


Position
POSITION decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • One specific answer to topic question

  • Particular stance on topic

    • Yes, the federal government should approve the Keystone Pipeline

    • No, the federal government should not approve the Keystone Pipeline


Sides
SIDES decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Identify all who share a position using shortcuts (efficient)

  • Tell readers

    • Opponents and Proponents

    • Side A and Side B

    • Pro Dream Act, and Anti Dream Act

  • Avoid generalizations


Stakeholders
STAKEHOLDERS decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • “Who holds each position?”

  • Important actors with a vested interest

    • Environmental Groups

    • Labor Unions

    • Oil Companies

    • Politicians


General stakeholders aggregate data
GENERAL STAKEHOLDERS (aggregate data) decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Broad types of people who have taken a specific position

  • Qualify as precisely as possible (some, many, %’s)

  • Not all of one type of people ever take one position (e.g. All Dems or Reps)


Specific stakeholders individual data
SPECIFIC STAKEHOLDERS (Individual Data) decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • These are real actors

  • “Leading the charge” for a given side

  • Specific individuals or named groups

    • Mitt Romney, Former Presidential Candidate

    • Nancy Pelosi, Former Speaker of the House


Issues
ISSUES decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Broad concerns that the sides are arguing over

  • No opinionated language

  • Generally sides “share” issues

  • Usually 4-5 issues per controversy


Arguments
ARGUMENTS decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Gives the OPINION of the side (which includes all the parties to the controversy) about each specific issue

  • Each side may have several arguments about each issue

  • Each argument should relate back to the side’s position.


Evidence
EVIDENCE decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • What each side uses to SUPPORT its arguments

  • Can include:

    • Statistical information

    • Case studies

    • Expert testimony


Plans actions
PLANS/ACTIONS decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • “What are the sides doing to insure their position is the one in force?”

  • Practical, concrete actions

  • Examples:

    developing proposals

    lobbying

    working with electoral system at all levels

    using the media


Examples of plans actions
EXAMPLES OF PLANS/ACTIONS decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Pro-Keystone:

    • working with lobbyists

    • electing sympathetic candidates

    • mobilizing supporters

  • Anti-Keystone

    • conducting studies to delay

    • media campaigns

    • electing sympathetic candidates


Values
VALUES decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Beliefs about what is good and desirable, or what is undesirable and to be avoided

  • All parties on a side hold all values


Review
REVIEW decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Topic question = the clearly stated controversy

  • Positions = possible answers to the topic question

  • Stakeholders = describes who takes each position

    • General = broad types of people

    • Specific = named groups or individuals who are leaders on each side


Review cont
REVIEW, cont. decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Issues = Concerns that the sides are arguing over

  • Arguments = opinions of each side related to each issue

  • Evidence – what a side gives to support each argument


Review cont1
REVIEW, cont. decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Plans = Concrete actions taken to insure that the side’s position is the one in force

  • Values = beliefs about what is right and wrong


Review example
REVIEW EXAMPLE decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Topic question: Should the Federal Government approve the Keystone pipeline?

  • One position: No, the federal government should not approve the pipeline

  • Side Nickname: opponents


Review example cont
REVIEW EXAMPLE, cont. decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • General Stakeholders on opponents side: Environmental Groups, some Democrats; etc.

  • Specific Stakeholders on opponents side: Sierra Club, President Obama


Review example cont1
REVIEW EXAMPLE, cont. decision makers are actively trying to solve it

  • Opponents side’s plans: electing Democrats, delaying through studies.

  • Opponents side’s underlying values: The environment, safety, reduced dependence on oil


ad