1 / 35

Evaluation of NRF and NRF*HF dairy cattle under Irish production circumstances

Evaluation of NRF and NRF*HF dairy cattle under Irish production circumstances. Frank Buckley and Noreen Begley. RATIONALE. Declining reproduction and health Increase overall profitability Favourable characteristics from another breed Hybrid vigour/heterosis Production – 5% to 6%

kyran
Download Presentation

Evaluation of NRF and NRF*HF dairy cattle under Irish production circumstances

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluation of NRF and NRF*HF dairy cattle under Irish production circumstances Frank Buckley and Noreen Begley

  2. RATIONALE • Declining reproduction and health • Increase overall profitability • Favourable characteristics from another breed • Hybrid vigour/heterosis • Production – 5% to 6% • Health/fertility – up to 20% • New Zealand • 25% of herd crossbred and rising – ‘popular because profitable’ • Crossbred cows have improved health and reproduction • Growing farmer interest in Ireland and internationally • ICBF - Across Breed Evaluation system More high EBI sires

  3. NRF - Total Merit Index

  4. STUDY OBJECTIVES

  5. BREED & HETEROSIS EFFECTS HV =Extra performance above mid-parent mean.

  6. SCALE OF STUDY 400 Contemporaries = 1200 in total 10 NRF sires = 80 daughters/sire

  7. TIME SCALE

  8. MEASUREMENTS • Calving performance • Puberty – Ultrasound & P4 • Fertility & hormonal intervention • Live weight & body condition score • Skeletal measurements • Milk production & udder health • Energy balance – BCS, weight, blood metabolites • Linear classification – IHFA • Immune responsiveness

  9. CALVING EASE

  10. Early Maturing?

  11. % CYCLING 82% 80% 77%

  12. MILK PRODUCTION

  13. 305d MILK 5339kg 5149kg 5356kg 103kg or 2%

  14. 305d FAT % 3.99% 3.96% 3.93%

  15. 305d PROTEIN % 3.46% 3.45% 3.45%

  16. PRE-CALVING BCS AND WEIGHT

  17. PRE-CALVING BCS 3.17 3.26 3.29 0.03 or 1%

  18. PRE-CALVING WEIGHT 532kg 538kg 514kg 15kg or 2.9%

  19. BCS AND WEIGHT AT BREEDING

  20. BCS AT BREEDING 2.85 2.97 3.03 0.03 or 1%

  21. WEIGHT AT BREEDING 464kg 467kg 446kg 12kg or 2.6%

  22. BCS AND WEIGHTAT DRYING OFF

  23. DRY-OFF BCS 2.81 2.94 3.01 0.03 or 1%

  24. DRY-OFF WEIGHT 544kg 545kg 526kg 10kg or 2%

  25. LINEAR SCORES

  26. LINEAR SCORES

  27. UDDER HEALTH

  28. SCC (x1000cells/ml) 190 137 131

  29. SCC – INCIDENCE >400 9.5% 6.9% 5.7%

  30. MASTITIS 15.6% 11.9% 11.4%

  31. FERTILITY

  32. PREG RATE TO 1ST SERVICE 58% 61% 61%

  33. IN-CALF RATE 93% 95% 91%

  34. SUMMARY • NRF • Easy calving when mated to HF • Reach puberty similar to HF • Higher BCS (+0.15) • Lower weight (-20kg) • Lower milk yield (-200kg or -45 gallons) • Lower Fat% (-0.06%) • Similar Protein% • Poorer classification • Improved udder health • Improved Fertility

  35. SUMMARY • HF x NRF • Reach puberty similar to HF • Higher BCS (+0.10) (HV 1%) • Similar weight (HV 3%) • Similar milk yield (HV 2%) • Similar Fat% • Similar Protein% • Slightly lower classification • Improved udder health • Improved Fertility

More Related