1 / 25

Skaraborg

The Skaraborg Project Population based studies over three decades Professor Ulf Lindblad MD, PhD University of Gothenburg and West Sweden Primary Care Mikael Åberg MPH Skaraborg Primary Care R&D. Skaraborg. Gothenburg. Research use of diabetes registries. Specific study question

Download Presentation

Skaraborg

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Skaraborg ProjectPopulation based studies over three decades Professor Ulf Lindblad MD, PhD University of Gothenburg and West Sweden Primary CareMikael Åberg MPH Skaraborg Primary Care R&D

  2. Skaraborg Gothenburg

  3. Research use of diabetes registries • Specific study question • Representative samples • Valid methods

  4. Research use of diabetes registries focusing on Quality Indicators • Patientrelated factors • Doctors and nurses • Current guidelines • Health care organisation / management

  5. Research use of diabetes registries • Identification of cohorts • Patient related factors • Hypertension • GUIDANCE

  6. Skaraborg Primary Care • Serving a population of 260 000 inhabitants • 15 municipalities • 24 health care clinics (3 hospitals) • 135 family physicians

  7. Skaraborg Primary Careregular follow-up of about… • 30 000 patients with hypertension • 10 000 patients with diabetes • 3000 patients with heart failure

  8. Skaraborg is a regional sample • Good information on the background population • Fairly complete data in primary care data registry • It should be possible to contribute with most relevant indicatiors

  9. DM in The Skaraborg SPCD

  10. Blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg

  11. BMI ≥30 kg/m2

  12. Identification of cohorts • Longitudinal follow-up using different health data registries

  13. Identification of cohortslongitudinal follow-up • SPCD 2010: All patients seen with diabetes are identified as a cohort • Linkage to: National Mortality Register National hospital in-patient register National prescription register Tax authorities for income, work and edu • Ethical board has to approve this

  14. Research use of diabetes registries focusing on Quality Indicators • Patientrelated factors • Doctors and nurses • Current guidelines • Health care organisation / management

  15. Patient related factors • Physical activity (self-reported) • Smoking

  16. Patient related factos and QI’s in diabetes – SPCD Sweden 2008 • Significant association between low physical activity and - higher BMI (p<0.001)- Poorer HbA1c (p<0.001)- Lower HDL (p=0.011 m and p=0.014 w) • In females smoking was associated with higher BMI (p=0.027) and higher LDL (0.046)

  17. Hypertension in type 2 diabetesEUBIROD - opportunities • Review hypertension control in diabetes over EU using the same tool to collect data • Compare contexts and settings for delivery of diabetes care • Epidemiological tool to survey changes in QI’s over time using a standard method • Feedback to the clinics for quality assurance

  18. Hypertension in type 2 diabetesEUBIROD - limitations • Selection bias – different contexts and settings in different regions • Standardisation of variables: Validity of ”type of diabetes” must be improved

  19. Hypertension in type 2 diabetesEUBIROD - possibilities • Patient related factors: lifestyles, comorbidity • Factors linked to the health care providers -organization -staff • Variation according to local therapeutic guide-lines • Define a cohort to follow longitudinally for complications

  20. GUIDANCE Initiated by EASD • 8 countries each collecting 1000 patients • Cross-sectional survey of quality indicators vs patient related factors, staff factors Health care organisationGUIDLINES

  21. GUIDANCE Stone MA, Wilkinson JC, Charpentier G, Clochard N, Lindblad U, Müller UA, Nolan J, Rutten GE, Trento M, Kamlesh Khunti K, on behalf of the GUIDANCE Study Group. Recommendations for the management of people with type 2 diabetes: evaluation and comparison of guidelines from eight European countries. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2010;87:252-60. Epub 2009 Nov 22.

  22. Thank you!

  23. Examples from the litterature • Examples from the litterature

  24. ”Rule of halves”

More Related