The dark connection between Canis Major, Monoceros Stream, gas flaring, the rotation curve and the EGRET excess. Ingredients to this analysis. From EGRET excess of diffuse Galactic gamma rays Determination of WIMP mass Determination of WIMP halo (= standard halo + DM ring)
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
The dark connection between Canis Major, Monoceros Stream,
gas flaring, the rotation curve and the EGRET excess
Ingredientsto this analysis
history of WIMPs
Annihilation cross section
Tidal disruption of dwarfs
Gamma ray spectra
for BG + DMA
What is known about Dark Matter?
From CMB + SN1a + surveys
If it is not dark
It does not matter
DM halo profile of galaxy
cluster from weak lensing
T>>M: f+f->M+M; M+M->f+f
T=M/22: M decoupled, stable density
(wenn Annihilationrate Expansions- rate,i.e. =<v>n(xfr) H(xfr) !)
Thermal equilibrium abundance
Comoving number density
WMAP -> h2=0.1130.009 ->
DM increases in Galaxies:
1 WIMP/coffee cup 105 <ρ>.
DMA (ρ2) restarts again..
Annihilation into lighter particles, like
quarks and leptons -> 0’s -> Gammas!
Only assumption in this analysis:
WIMP = THERMAL RELIC!
Gary Steigmann (
IF DM particles are thermal relics from early universe
they can annihilate with cross section as large as
which implies an enormous rate of gamma rays
from π0 decays (produced in quark fragmentation)
(Galaxy=1040 higher rate than any accelerator)
Expect significant fraction of energetic
Galactic gamma rays to come from DMA in this case.
Remaining ones from pCR+pGAS-> π0+X, π0->2γ
This means: Galactic gamma rays have 2 components
with a shape KNOWN from the 2 BEST studied reactions
in accelerators: background known from fixed target exp.
DMA known from e+e- annihilation (LEP)
Quark fragmentation known!
Hence spectra of positrons,
gammas and antiprotons known!
Relative amount of ,p,e+ known
+ A b bbar quark pair
Sum of diagrams should yield
<σv>=2.10-26 cm3/s to get
correct relic density
Basic principle for indirect dark matter searches
From rotation curve:
or M/r=const.for v=cons.
for flat rotation curve
Expect highest DM density
IN CENTRE OF GALAXY
Divergent for r=0?
Isotherm profile const.
IF FLUX AND SHAPE MEASURED IN
ONE DIRECTION, THEN FLUX ANDSHAPE FIXED IN ALL (=180) SKY
THIS IS AN INCREDIBLE CONSTRAINT, LIKE SAYING I VERIFY
THE EXCESS AND WIMP MASS WITH 180 INDEPENDENT MEAS.
EGRET on CGRO (Compton Gamma Ray Observ.)Data publicly available from NASA archive
Energy range: 0.02-30 GeV
Energy resolution: ~20%
Effective area: 1500 cm2
Angular resol.: <0.50
Data taking: 1991-1994
Catalogue of point sources
Excess in diffuse gamma rays
Two results from EGRET paper
Enhancement in ringlike
structure at 13-16 kpc
Background + signal describe EGRET data!
What about background shape?
Background from nuclear interactions (mainly p+p-> π0 + X -> + X
inverse Compton scattering (e-+ -> e- + )
Bremsstrahlung (e- + N -> e- + + N)
Shape of background KNOWN if Cosmic Ray spectra of p and e- known
= 1/E dE/dt
Protons diffuse much faster than energy loss time, so expect SAME shape everywhere. Indeed observed: outer Galaxy can be fitted with same shape as inner Galaxy.
Analysis of EGRET Data in 6 sky directions
C: outer Galaxy
A: inner Galaxy
B: outer disc
Total 2 for all regions :28/36 Prob.= 0.8 Excess above background > 10σ.
E: intermediate lat.
F: galactic poles
D: low latitude
A: inner Galaxy (l=±300, |b|<50)
B: Galactic plane avoiding A
C: Outer Galaxy
D: low latitude (10-200)
E: intermediate lat. (20-600)
F: Galactic poles (60-900)
Fits for 180 instead of 6 regions
80in longitude 45 bins
4 bins in latitude 00<|b|<50 50<|b|<100
>1400 data points.
Reduced 2≈1 with 7% errors
BUT NEEDED IN ADDITION to 1/r2 profile, substructure
in the form of 2 doughnut-like
rings in the Galactic disc!
ONE RING COINCIDES WITHORBIT FROM CANIS MAJORDWARF GALAXY which loses
mass along orbit by tidal forces
OTHER RING coincides with H2 ring
2002,Newberg et al. Ibata et al,
Crane et al. Yanny et al.
1/r2 profile and rings
determined from inde-pendent directions
Normalize to solar velocity of 220 km/s
Dark Matter distribution
How does DM substructure form
from tidal disruption of dwarf
The local group of galaxies
The Milky Way and its 13 satellite galaxies
Tidal force ΔFG 1/r3
Tidal streams of dark matter from CM and Sgt
From David Law, Caltech
Artistic view of Canis Major Dwarf
just below Galactic disc
Canis Major Dwarf orbits from N-body simulations
to fit visible ring of stars at 13 and 18 kpc
Movie from Nicolas Martin, Rodrigo Ibata
Canis Major leaves at 13 kpc tidal stream of
gas(106 M☉ from 21 cm line), stars (108 M☉ ,visible),
dark matter (1010 M☉, EGRET)
N-body simulation from Canis-Major dwarf galaxy
Canis Major (b=-150)
P M W Kalberla, L Dedes, J Kerp and U Haud,
Gas flaring in the Milky Way
Gas flaring needs EGRET ring with mass of 2.1010M☉!
Inner Ring coincides with ring of dust and H2 ->
gravitational potential well!
4 kpc coincides with ring of
neutral hydrogen molecules!
H+H->H2 in presence of dust->
grav. potential well at 4-5 kpc.
Enhancement of inner (outer) ring over 1/r2 profile 6 (8).
Mass in rings 0.3 (3)% of total DM
Do antiproton data exclude interpretation of EGRET data?
Bergstrom et al. astro-ph/0603632, Abstract:
we investigate the viability of the model using the DarkSUSY package to compute the gamma-ray and antiproton fluxes. We are able to show that their (=WdB et al) model is excluded by a wide margin from the measured flux of antiprotons.
Another propagation model including static magnetic fields and gas clouds and anisotropic diffusion
it is shown that Galactic cosmic rays can be effectively confined through
magnetic reflection by molecular clouds,
Integral excess of positrons in bulge because positrons are trapped in magnetic mirrors between gas clouds?
The van Allen belts are trapped cosmic
rays in magnetic mirrors of earth
Radiation in inner belt: 25 Sv/yr inside space ship
Lethal dose for human: 3 Sv/h
Satellites switch of electronics, when
entering dense radiation areas.
Escape time of cosmic rays and
grammage (distance x density)
B/C determines grammage
10Be/9Be determines escape time
grammage (smaller than disc!)
In GALPROP: by large halo
In CHANDRAN: by reflecting
10Be (t1/2 = 1.51 Myr) is cosmic
clock: lifetime of cosmics 107 yrs.
In GALPROP: by large halo
In CHANDRAN: by long trapping.
Preliminary results from GALPROP
with isotropic and anisotropic propagation
Summary: with fast propagation perp. to disc (e.g. by convection,
fast diffusion or static magnetic fields) one reduces contribution
of charged particles from DMA by large factor and can be
consistent with B/C and 10Be/9Be
Comparing radioactive isotopes with
positron distribution (Knödlseder et al.)
1809 keV (26Al)
Problem: expect most low energy positrons to
originate from radioactive nuclei with β+ decay.
But these are distributed in bulge AND disk.
Positrons mostly in bulge. Why???
Unknown positron source only in bulge?? Light DM?
Or simply: relativistic positrons escape in
disk and annihilate in bulge?
NO annihilation in molecular
clouds (MC), although 75% of
mass in MC. Why?
Either volume of MC too small
OR MC are magnetic mirrors
as postulated by Chandran!
5 parameters: m0, m1/2, tanb, A, sign μ
and gluinos light
LSP largely Bino DM may be supersymmetric partner of CMB
EGRET excess interpreted as DM consistent with
WMAP, Supergravity and electroweak constraints
Gauge unification perfect with SUSY spectrum from EGRET
Update from Amaldi, dB,
Fürstenau, PLB 260 1991
With SUSY spectrum from EGRET + WMAP data and start values of couplings from final LEP data perfect gauge coupling unification!
Also b->s and g-2 in agreement with SUSY spectrum from EGRET
Indirect DM detection from solar neutrinos
Celestial bodies collect DM
in their cores by their high density.
Annihilation can result in flux of
HIGH energy neutrinos from sun
(from b-decays or from Z-decays).
Neutrinos can be detected by large detectors,like Super-Kamiokande, Amanda, Ice-Cube, Baksan
by the charged current interactions
with nuclei,which yields muons in the detectors.
Direct Detection of WIMPs
WIMPs elastically scatter off nuclei => nuclear recoils
Measure recoil energy spectrum in target
If SUSY particle spectrum
known, elastic scattering
X-section can be calculated
Galaxy formation starting from quantum fluctuations
Clustering enhances flux from DMA by factor 20-200 (Dokuchaev et al.)
Movie from M. Steinmetz, Potsdam
Clustering of DM
An artist picture of what we should see if our
eyes were sensitive to 3 GeV gamma rays and we
were flying with 220 km/s through the DM halo
What is the origin of “GeV excess” of diffuse Galactic Gamma Rays?
Why a change of slope in the galactic rotation curve at R0 ≈ 11 kpc?
Why ring of stars at 13 kpc?
Why ring of molecular hydrogen at 4 kpc?
Why S-shape in gas flaring?
Cosmologists: How is DM annihilating?A: into quark pairs
How is Cold Dark Matter distributed?
Is DM annihilating as expected in Supersymmetry?
A: DM annihilation
A: DM substructure
A: standard profile +
A: Cross sections perfectly consistent with mSUGRA
for light gauginos, heavy squarks/sleptons
>>10σ EGRET excess shows intriguing hint that:
WIMP is thermal relic with expected annihilation into quark pairs
DM becomes visible by gamma rays from fragmentation
(30-40 gamma rays of few GeV pro annihilation from π0 decays)
Results rather model independent, since only KNOWN spectral shapes of signal and background used, NO model dependent calculations of abs.fluxes.
Different shapes or unknown experimental problems may change the gamma ray flux and/or WIMP mass, BUT NOT the distribution in the sky.
SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION of annihilation signal is signature for DMA
which clearly shows that EGRET excess is tracer of DM by fact that
one can construct rotation curve and tidal streams from gamma rays.
DM interpretation strongly supported independently by gas flaring
DM interpretation perfectly consistent with Supersymmetry