Progress in the design of a damped an
Download
1 / 35

Progress in the design of a damped an tapered accelerating structure for CLIC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 107 Views
  • Uploaded on

Progress in the design of a damped an tapered accelerating structure for CLIC. Jean-Yves Raguin CERN AB/RF. The Tapered Damped Structure. 2 p /3 travelling-wave mode, 150 cells – Av. Acc. Grad. of 150 MV/m Strong damping Each cell coupled to four rectangular identical waveguides

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Progress in the design of a damped an tapered accelerating structure for CLIC' - kyla-shelton


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Progress in the design of a damped an

tapered accelerating structure for CLIC

Jean-Yves Raguin

CERN AB/RF


The tapered damped structure
The Tapered Damped Structure

  • 2p/3 travelling-wave mode, 150 cells – Av. Acc. Grad. of 150 MV/m

  • Strong damping

    • Each cell coupled to four rectangular identical waveguides

      Cutoff frequency of the fundamental waveguide mode between the p-mode frequency of the fundamental passband and the lowest frequency of the first dipole band

    • Trapped fundamental mode whereas the E-M energy of the higher modes propagates out of the cells and is absorbed by SiC loads terminating the waveguides

  • Light detuning

    • Linear variation of the irises radius from 2.25 mm at the head of the structure to 1.75 mm at the end, each cell being tuned to have the same fundamental frequencies

    • Dipole frequency spread (5.4 %) which contributes to a further reduction of the transverse wakefields

      Demonstrated suppression of the transverse wakefields by two orders of magnitude within 0.67 ns (time between two consecutive bunches) on a 15 GHz-scaled version (ASSET experiment)


Accelerating mode: electric field magnitude (Log)

SiC load

Dipole mode: Poynting vector


Performance limits and peak surface electric fields

L= 50 cm

Pin/section = 248 MW

h = 23.8 %


Pulsed surface heating

Temperature increase for the middle cell of the TDS with

= 150 MV/m and tp=130ns

Due to the configuration of the cell-waveguide coupling iris (3.3 mm wide) the local magnetic field is too high,

leading to excessive maximum temperature rise


Design of a new 2 p 3 damped and tapered structure

To prevent electric breakdown, low peak surface electric field

To prevent excessive pulse heating, low peak surface magnetic field

Good damping of higher order modes and, in particular, of the first and second dipole modes

Use of an elliptical profile for irises

Appropriate profile of the cells wall

Damping of higher order modes by coupling each cell to four T-cross waveguides

Design of a new 2p /3 damped and tapered structure

Solutions

Criteria to design new CLIC

damped accelerating structure



Field pattern of the first two waveguide modes field

Fundamental mode

Damping for the first dipole band

Second mode

Damping for the second dipole band

Electric field

Electric field

Perfect Elec. wall

Perfect Mag. wall

Magnetic field

Magnetic field


First cell field

Iris thickness: 0.55 mm

2.0 mm

3.792 mm

Q=3744

with s = 5.80.107 Mhos/m (Cu)

R’/Q= 24.5 kW /m

vg/c = 8.1 %

fcutoff,TE10-e = 32.1 GHz

Epeak / Eacc = 2.55

Hpeak / Eacc = 4.50 mA/V

3.0 mm

5.25 mm


H field surf/Eacc (mA/V) on the walls of the first cell


Last cell field

Iris thickness: 1.00 mm

1.5 mm

3.661 mm

Q=3373

with s = 5.80.107 Mhos/m (Cu)

R’/Q= 30.0 kW /m

vg/c = 2.6 %

fcutoff,TE10-e = 32.4 GHz

Epeak / Eacc = 1.75

Hpeak / Eacc = 4.38 mA/V

3.0 mm

5.25 mm


For 84 cells (L= 28 cm) field

Epeak=400 MV/m

Pin/section = 130 MW

h = 26.1 %

DT=154 K

DT=120 K


Transverse wakefields analysis field

First cell

Middle cell

Last cell

Real part of the transverse impedance vs. frequency computed with GdfidL for the first, middle and last cells

Transverse wakefields

|W t | = 90 V/pC/mm/m at the 2nd bunch

Q dip,first= 52 Q dip,middle= 51

Q dip,last= 44 Dfdip /f dip,first = 3.3 %



Design of a damped structure b d 110 deg
Design of a damped structure - field bd = 110 deg.

Working at a lower phase

advance allows to decrease

Epeak / Eacc

Decrease iris thickness along

the structure

Increase the coupling cell-

waveguide along the structure

for better damping


First cell field

Iris thickness: 0.80 mm

2.0 mm

3.870 mm

Q=3387

with s = 5.80.107 Mhos/m (Cu)

R’/Q= 24.1 kW /m

vg/c = 7.7 %

fcutoff,TE10-e = 32.3 GHz

Epeak / Eacc = 2.21

Hpeak / Eacc = 4.50 mA/V

3.0 mm

5.25 mm


Last cell field

Iris thickness: 0.55 mm

1.5 mm

3.539 mm

Q=3365

with s = 5.80.107 Mhos/m (Cu)

R’/Q= 33.2 kW /m

vg/c = 3.8 %

fcutoff,TE10-e = 32.3 GHz

Epeak / Eacc = 2.00

Hpeak / Eacc = 4.17 mA/V

3.2 mm

5.32 mm


For 83 cells (L= 25.4 cm) field

Epeak=355 MV/m

Pin/section = 128 MW

h = 24.8 %

DT=122 K

DT=122 K


Transverse wakefields analysis field

First cell

Middle cell

Last cell

Real part of the transverse impedance vs. frequency computed with GdfidL for the first, middle and last cells

Transverse wakefields

|W t | = 58 V/pC/mm/m at the 2nd bunch

Q dip,first= 53 Q dip,middle= 31

Q dip,last= 24 Dfdip /f dip,first = 4.9 %



Design of a damped structure b d 110 deg 2
Design of a damped structure - field bd = 110 deg. (2)

First cell

Iris thickness: 0.80 mm

2.0 mm

3.867 mm

Q=3266

with s = 5.51.107 Mhos/m (Cu)

R’/Q= 24.0 kW /m

vg/c = 7.6 %

fcutoff,TE10-e = 32.3 GHz

Epeak / Eacc = 2.20

Hpeak / Eacc = 4.51 mA/V

3.0 mm

5.25 mm


Last cell field

Iris thickness: 0.55 mm

1.5 mm

3.532 mm

Q=3252

with s = 5.51.107 Mhos/m (Cu)

R’/Q= 32.5 kW /m

vg/c = 3.8 %

fcutoff,TE10-e = 32.3 GHz

Epeak / Eacc = 1.95

Hpeak / Eacc = 4.10 mA/V

3.2 mm

5.32 mm


For 83 cells (L= 25.4 cm) field

Epeak=355 MV/m

Pin/section = 130 MW

h = 24.4 %

DT=119 K

DT=128 K


For 77 cells (L= 23.5 cm) field

Epeak=348 MV/m

Pin/section = 125 MW

h = 23.8 %

DT=121 K

DT=122 K


Transverse wakefields analysis 83-cell structure field

First cell

Middle cell

Last cell

Real part of the transverse impedance vs. frequency computed with GdfidL for the first, middle and last cells

Transverse wakefields

|W t | = 45 V/pC/mm/m at the 2nd bunch

Q dip,first= 43 Q dip,middle= 27

Q dip,last= 21 Df dip/f dip,first = 5.4 %



Average accelerating gradient of 125 MV/m field

For 75 cells (L= 22.9 cm)

Epeak< 300 MV/m

Pin/section = 89 MW

h = 27.2 %

DT=88 K

DT=87 K

with the same

beam current…


Conclusions
Conclusions field

  • Design of copper structure with average accelerating gradient of 150 MV/m, peak surface electric field lower that 300 MV/m and maximum temperature rise lower than 100 K seems unrealistic – would lead to smaller iris radius

  • Copper structure with average accelerating gradient of 125 MV/m, peak surface electric field lower that 300 MV/m and maximum temperature rise lower than 100 K seems feasible

  • Investigation of new materials

    • Design of the latest structure with molybdenum irises – calls for a reassessment of the fundamental mode characteristics

    • Material for the cell outer walls which would solve the pulsed surface heating problem?

  • Transverse wakefields suppression

    • Need for tuning the dipole frequencies


ad