1 / 43

Echo Club Invasive hemodynamic evaluation of regurgitation

Echo Club Invasive hemodynamic evaluation of regurgitation. Mohammed Almansori MBBS, FRCPC Assistant Professor of Medicine & Interventional C ardiologist University of Dammam.

kueng
Download Presentation

Echo Club Invasive hemodynamic evaluation of regurgitation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Echo ClubInvasive hemodynamic evaluation of regurgitation Mohammed Almansori MBBS, FRCPC Assistant Professor of Medicine & Interventional Cardiologist University of Dammam

  2. In every patient in whom it was considered that a decision could be reached by echocardiography alone (>80% of pts) there was 100% agreement from cardiac catheterization. • So, in patients with adequate echo data Cath can be omitted. • If echo indices are conflicting or significant CAD is suspected catheterization should be considered

  3. Indication of invasive hemodynamic evaluation: When pulmonary pressure is disproportionate to the severity of regurgitation assessed noninvasively. When there is a discrepancy between clinical and noninvasive findings.

  4. Seller’s Classification of Regurgitation.

  5. Reg stroke volume = Angio stroke volume – Forward stroke volume Rough estimation of RF compared to visual interpretation: 1+ Reg is equivalent to RF of 20% 2+ Reg is equivalent to RF of 20-40% 3+ Reg is equivalent to RF of 40-60 4+ Reg is equivalent to RF of > 60%

  6. Hemodynamics of Mitral Regurgitation

  7. Prominent V wave Peak > 40 mmHg Delta peak V wave and mean PCWP > 10 mmHg Ratio peak V wave and mean PCWP > 2 It does not correlate with the presence or severity of mitral regurgitation

  8. A small diastolic pressure gradient may be observed across the mitral valve; however, unlike mitral stenosis, the gradient is present during early diastole only. In addition, the slope of the y descent in mitral regurgitation is steep rather than delayed, as seen in mitral stenosis.

  9. Camelback PA tracing

  10. The transmission of this pressure wave from the pulmonary veins to the pulmonary artery also explains the occasional phenomenon of a false elevation in the pulmonary artery saturation, in some cases of severe mitral regurgitation.

  11. In patients with only minor mitral regurgitation which is suspected to contribute to their clinical symptoms , the monitoring of invasive hemodynamic parameters (V-wave) during stress is important

  12. Hemodynamics of Aortic Regurgitation

  13. A Case of Aortic Regurgitation

  14. A 71-year-old man know to have moderate AR presented with a month of CCS-III angina and shortness of breath. No other medical illnesses. O/E HR 63 BP 164/53 JVP 9 cm H2O Early diastolic murmur of AR + Pansystolic murmur of MR + S3 Occasional crepitation on chest auscultation No LL edema CXR cardiomegaly , No pulmonary edema

  15. Baseline ECG

  16. ECG in Emergency Room

  17. ECG Next Day in CCU

  18. Echo: Normal LV function. (LVIDd 6.3cm - LVIDs 4.0cm) Moderate to severe AR Moderate MR

  19. Coronary angiogram showed mild non-obstructive disease. Aortic root angiogram showed severe aortic regurgitation.

  20. Mean PAP 42 mmHg PCWP 25 mmHg Cold not get LV tracing due to catheter induced VT

  21. Thank you

More Related