1 / 38

“On Demand” Citizens: e-government at high speed

“On Demand” Citizens: e-government at high speed. John B. Horrigan, Ph.D. Director of Research Pew Internet & American Life Project May 25, 2005 Presentation to FedWeb Spring 2005. Presentation Outline. Trends in internet adoption & use Findings from our e-gov study of last year

Download Presentation

“On Demand” Citizens: e-government at high speed

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. “On Demand” Citizens:e-government at high speed John B. Horrigan, Ph.D. Director of Research Pew Internet & American Life Project May 25, 2005 Presentation to FedWeb Spring 2005

  2. Presentation Outline • Trends in internet adoption & use • Findings from our e-gov study of last year • What it adds up to • The future

  3. Home media capacity - 1975 Product Route to homeDisplayLocal storage TV stations phone TV Cassette/ 8-track broadcast TV radio broadcast radio stereo Vinyl album Local news mail Advertising newspaper delivery phone Radio Stations Tom Wolzein, Sanford C. Bernstein & Co

  4. Home media capacity – now Product Route to homeDisplayLocal storage cable VCR TV stations phone/DSL TV Info wireless radio DVD “Daily me” broadcast TV PC Web-based storage content Server/ TiVo (PVR) Cable Nets broadcast radio stereo PC Web sites satellite monitor Local news mail headphones CD/CD-ROM Content from express delivery pager individuals iPod / storage MP3 player / iPod Peer-to-peer subcarriers / WIFI cell phone pagers - PDAs Advertising newspaper delivery phone cable box Radio stations PDA/Palm game console game console Satellite radio non-electronic Storage sticks/disks Tom Wolzein, Sanford C. Bernstein & Co

  5. Time & money spent on media: TV, radio, music, daily paper, books, mags, home video, movies, internet

  6. Percent of adult Americans with internet access, 2000-2005

  7. Broadband at home, 2000-2004

  8. Time spent online(number of minutes online, typical day – by age: Jan. ‘05)

  9. Where does the time come from?(Self-reported estimates, broadband users only, January 2002)

  10. Elite “on demand” internet users • Information empowers, reduces uncertainties • Health care • Civic/political engagement • Consumer research • Internet helps foster social capital • Creativity • Create own content • Recombine other Web content • Upshot – rising expectations among tech elite about internet’s effectiveness

  11. Trends in general e-Gov use(% of internet users who have gone to federal, state, or local Web sites)

  12. Nature of e-gov experience • Most (80%) find what they are looking for at government Web sites (2002) • Lots of basic information searching. • Tourist/recreational information • Research • Get forms • Service inquiry • Policy issues • Rising expectations (2002): • 65% of all Americans expect government info to be on the Web • 39% of all Americans will turn to the Net first for next government contact. • 37% of all Americans will turn to phone

  13. Online surfing for government information in 2003: 77% of online users did at least one of following • 66% look for general information from federal, state, or local sites • 27% have sent emails to government • 28% have gotten advice about a health or safety issue from a government agency • 34% get recreational/tourist information • 41% research official documents/statistics • 23% get information about or apply for benefits • 30% have used the Internet to try to change a government policy or affect a vote on a law

  14. Contacting government:How does the internet’s fit in?July 2003 RDD survey of 2,925 adult Americans • What share of people contact government? • By what means do they contact government? • What do they contact government for? • Are they successful? Satisfied? • What are people’s preferred method of contact?

  15. Contacting Government • 54% of all Americans contacted the government in year prior to survey • 72% of Internet users contacted government • 23% of non-Internet users contacted government • 63% of all Americans were Internet users in July 2003 survey • 54% figure excludes those whose last contact with government was mailing taxes • We call them Government Patrons

  16. What people did the last time they contacted government … * • Carry out a transaction  30% • Get information about specific question  25% • Express an opinion  19% • Get help solving a problem  11% • Other  7% * Based on contact within past year not related to mailing in a tax return, n=1,657, July 2003 survey

  17. Method of contact last time … 42%  phone 29%  Web site 20%  in person 18%  email 17%  letter People use multiple channels – 22% do Preferred means of contact … 40%  phone 24%  Web site 13%  in person 11%  email 10%  letter People switch along way – 23% do Means of Contact – Government Patrons

  18. Preferred Means of Contact, level of government (Government Patrons)

  19. Important case: 14% of population with disabilities • They are less likely to be online • 40% are internet users • Less likely to contact government • 48% have • Less likely to be successful in last interaction with government • 52% report success • Very likely to prefer non-cyber means to contact government • 44% prefer telephone contact • 21% prefer in-person • 16% prefer writing a letter

  20. Preferred means of contact – by reason for contact – Government Patrons

  21. Preferred Means of Contact by Issue Area (1) – all respondents

  22. Preferred Means of Contact by Issue Area (2) – all respondents

  23. Pace & patterns of use • It’s an occasional thing • Two-thirds of Government Patrons contact gov LESS OFTEN than every few months • It’s personal • 71% for personal business – 72% from home • It’s multi-modal • 23% used multiple channels • It’s search-engine driven…. Marketing could stand some help • 37% used search engines • Only 38% know about 800 numbers and Web sites • (Even in phone calls – 27% called the operator or used phone book) • It’s interactive • 67% want a response to emails

  24. Success & Satisfaction • 76% of all who contacted government were “very” or “somewhat” satisfied with experience • 63% were successful in accomplishing what they wanted • 65% of Internet users were successful • 53% of non-Internet users were successful • 46% said contact took about the amount of time they expected • 28% said it took more time than expected • 24% said it took less time than expected

  25. Success and Satisfaction by Type of Contact

  26. Success and Satisfaction: by education

  27. Problems – phone contact(% ‘yes’)

  28. Problems – Web contact (% ‘yes’)

  29. Some Puzzles … • What is behind Internet users contacting government more often than non-users? • What is behind Internet users reporting higher success rates with their interactions with government? • Could be Internet users possess certain characteristics that increase likelihood of contact or probability of success

  30. Answers: Contact • Internet seems to increase likelihood that people contact government … • Controlling for lots of demographic, socio-economic, and attitudinal factors • Two effects: • Net users are inherently more likely to contact government • The Internet encourages additional contact

  31. Answers: Success • Being an Internet user, in itself, isn’t associated with successful outcomes with government • Preferred channels of contact matters: • Those who prefer the phone or the Internet are more likely to be successful • Those who prefer to write letters or show up in person are less likely to be successful • Where do preferences for the Internet come from? • Those who have high levels of education, lots of experience with the Internet • Efficiency benefits of internet use to contact government

  32. Perceptions on e-gov’s impact … • How much, if at all, has the Internet improved the way you interact with government?

  33. Upshot … • Internet is a new channel to contact government • People use it & like it • It is additive • Internet can help with outcomes in government contact but . . . • It helps people who already can help themselves

  34. What people want & need from e-gov • Multiple channels still important – even for Internet users… • People use multiple channels in an interaction with government & switch along the way • Offline channels important to sub-groups… • One-third of America not online • People with disabilities • “Real time” interaction still preferred for urgent or complex problems.

  35. Future • Broadband • Has risen from 32% to 50% of home internet users since our 2003 study • Voice over Internet Protocol • Very low consumer adoption now but promises to deliver real-time online help to customers

  36. Service delivery for “on demand” citizens • Users want to be able to toggle to interactive help in real-time • Study complementarities • Do some channels work better in conjunction with others? • Integrate traditional channels into Web & email

  37. Reach me… John B. Horrigan jhorrigan@pewinternet.org 202.419.4500 1615 L Street, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC www.pewinternet.org

More Related