Freedom of investment between EU and
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 10

Freedom of investment between EU and non-EU Member States and its impact on corporate income tax systems within the European Union Dr. D.S. Smit LL.M. PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 47 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Freedom of investment between EU and non-EU Member States and its impact on corporate income tax systems within the European Union Dr. D.S. Smit LL.M. The Research Question. Starting point: international economic integration within the European Union

Download Presentation

Freedom of investment between EU and non-EU Member States and its impact on corporate income tax systems within the European Union Dr. D.S. Smit LL.M.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Freedom of investment between eu and non eu member states and its impact on corporate income tax systems within the european union dr d s smit ll m

Freedom of investment between EU and non-EU Member States and its impact on corporate income tax systems within the European Union Dr. D.S. Smit LL.M.


The research question

The Research Question

  • Starting point: international economic integration within the European Union

    • Free movement of persons, services & capital (“freedom of investment”)

    • Huge impact on Member States’ company tax regimes within the EU

  • International economic integration does not stop, however, at the borders of the EU

    • European Commission (2006): “European openness”

    • Article 63 TFEU: free movement of capital between Member States and between Member States and third countries

    • Various Association, Partnership and Cooperation Agreements with third countries


The research question1

The Research Question

  • Research question:

    • What is and should be the impact of the European free movement provisions on Member States’ company income tax systems in the relations between Member States and non-Member States?


Scope of the study

Scope of the Study

  • Focus on 6 corporate income tax measures in an international context*):

    • Direct third country investments between EU and non-EU Member States:

    • Indirect third country investments between EU and non-EU Member States through an EU intermediary:

Non-EU

EU

*)

1 Withholding taxes

2 Limitations on the deduction of interest expenses

3 Relief for double taxation

4 CFC-legislation

5 Loss compensation

6 Transfer of business assets

Non-EU

EU

Non-EU

EU

EU

EU

Non-EU

EU


Benchmark

Benchmark

  • Freedom of investment implies international tax neutrality

    • Inter-nations neutrality:

      • International tax neutrality can be best achieved if taxation does not adversely influence the relation between taxes and public goods to the disadvantage of transnational investment

      • Boils down, in its ultimate implications, to source-state based taxation

    • Neutrality considerations may be constrained by taxpayer equity considerations

    • Striking match with CJEU case law relating to freedom of investment:

      • Economic concept

      • Implies a genuine economic link with the territory of a Member State through the exercise of a genuine economic activity


Structure and conclusions of the study

Structure and Conclusions of the Study

  • H1: Research question and acknowledgements

  • H2: Benchmark

  • H3: Dividing line between EU Member States and non-EU Member States

    • Position of associated and dependent territories: (part of a) Member State or third country?

    • Conclusion: third country to the extent not bound to apply the Treaty provision at stake

  • H4: Relevant positive integration between the Member States

  • H5: Relevant negative integration between the Member States

    • Conclusion: significant impact on Member States company tax systems


Structure and conclusions of the study1

Structure and Conclusions of the Study

  • H6: Access to freedom of investment vis-à-vis third countries

    • Conclusion: The bigger the investment, the lower the protection (benchmark of “definite influence”)

  • H7: Discrimination and justification grounds under freedom of investment vis-à-vis third countries

    • Conclusion: More room to successfully rely on justification grounds

  • H8: Temporal scope of freedom of investment vis-à-vis third countries

    • Conclusion: Limits the protection under the free movement of capital under Article 63 TFEU

    • Extends the protection under the APC Agreements


Structure and conclusions of the study2

Structure and Conclusions of the Study

  • H9: Indirectly held third country investments (intermediate companies & dual resident companies)

    • No protection in case of tax avoidance

    • Benchmark: Intermediate company has no genuine economic link with the economy of Member State

    • Requirement of proportionality: taxpayer must still be allowed to provide proof to the contrary


Structure and conclusions of the study3

Structure and Conclusions of the Study

  • H10: Recommendations & conclusions

    • Amendment of existing tax Directives

      • Definition of “third countries”

      • Common relief for double taxation for income from third country investments

      • Common CFC-provision for third country investments with no genuine economic link or subject to special tax regime

      • Common WHT system in case of intermediate EU companies with no genuine economic link


Closing

Closing

  • Thank you for your attention…!


  • Login