1 / 26

Community Update

Community Update. Thanks to the voters…. Measure R passed with over 63% of the vote $3.87 billion for “the Safe and Healthy Neighborhood Schools Improvement Act of 2004”. What did you approve in Measure R ?. New construction/Acquisition projects ($1.857B)

kreeli
Download Presentation

Community Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Community Update Jan 31, 2005

  2. Thanks to the voters… • Measure R passed with over 63% of the vote • $3.87 billion for “the Safe and Healthy Neighborhood Schools Improvement Act of 2004” Jan 31, 2005

  3. What did you approve in Measure R ? • New construction/Acquisition projects ($1.857B) • Repair, Upgrade, and Modernization projects ($1.563B) - Specified projects - Projects of certain types Jan 31, 2005

  4. What we committed to… • A Plan • Engaging Stakeholders • Strategic Execution Plan Jan 31, 2005

  5. General Process • Some Projects Already Identified • Other Projects Need to be identified Jan 31, 2005

  6. Project types: • Major repair ($315M) • Core Facilities ($300M) • Small Learning Communities ($88M) Jan 31, 2005

  7. Identify the Remaining Projects Sorting Process Confirm Priorities Possible Major Repair Projects List Citizen’s Bond Oversight Committee & Board of Education June 2005 Strategic Execution Plan Possible Core Facilities Projects List Possible Small Learning Communities Projects List Community Review Jan 31, 2005

  8. Methodical Process • Assess the Needs • Condition of Buildings • Safety / Building Code Compliance • Functionality Jan 31, 2005

  9. 1. Major Repair Jan 31, 2005

  10. Prioritizing Major Repair Needs • Assess the Condition of the Facilities • Determine the Facilities Condition Index (FCI) The Higher the FCI: The Higher the Repair Needs Jan 31, 2005

  11. Facilities Condition Index (FCI) DISTRICT CLASSROOM BLDG Cost of Needed Repairs $22,500 FCI = = 0.14 = Current Replacement Value $160,000 Jan 31, 2005

  12. Approach: • Allocate funds to achieve consistent level of repair across District • Projects selected per weighted scores in the following categories: • Immediate health and safety • Code compliance and liability • Asset safeguards and deterioration • Age and aesthetics Jan 31, 2005

  13. 2. Core Facilities Sanitary Facilities Food Service Kitchen / Cafeteria Multi-Purpose Rooms Lunch Shelters Libraries Administrative Offices Gymnasiums Auditoriums Playgrounds Parking Jan 31, 2005

  14. Campus Ranking by Need Survey the Core Facilities Compare Existing Facility to New School Facility Prioritize the Needs by: Category of the Facility (cafeteria, library, etc.) Deficiency of the Facility (missing or too small) Jan 31, 2005

  15. Category PrioritiesHigher Category – More Points 1. Code Compliance & Life-Safety Requirements 2. Sanitary Facilities, Food Preparation, Food Serving, Indoor Dining/Multi-Purpose Room 3. Library, Administration Space, Lunch Shelter 4. Gymnasium, Auditorium, Playground, Parking Jan 31, 2005

  16. Deficiencies in FacilitiesLess Space / Greater Need – Higher Deficiency Factor Missing Core Facility – Maximum Deficiency Factor 100% of New School Facility - No Deficiency Factor Jan 31, 2005

  17. 76% Proposed Funding Distribution by Core Facilities Category • 76% for Missing or Extremely Deficient Core Facilities • 12% for Food Services Modernizations • 12% for Local District Determined “Needs-Based” Modernization 12% 12% Jan 31, 2005

  18. 3. Small Learning Communities Jan 31, 2005

  19. Program Objectives: • Conversion of existing High Schools and Middle Schools • Personalized learning environments of 350-500 students • Supports Autonomy of Space and Scheduling Jan 31, 2005

  20. Potential Projects: • Space conversions • Specialty classrooms (multimedia production, performing arts) • Decentralized core curriculum classrooms (science, computer labs) • Teachers’ meeting/work rooms • Support Staff/Admin. space • New buildings and additions Jan 31, 2005

  21. Priority Criteria: • Planned Instructional Programs • API Score • Program Improvement Status • Calendar • Student Population • Single-Track Capacity • New School Impact on Population • Number of SLCs planned Jan 31, 2005

  22. Delivery Plan: • Assessment / Scope Definition (Nov 04 – May 05) • School conversion requests • Scope review, estimates, and prioritization • Approval by Superintendent • Bond Oversight Committee review • Board of Education approval • Design / Construction Jan 31, 2005

  23. In Conclusion… Jan 31, 2005

  24. What will we accomplish? • Continuation of Proposition BB & Measure K • Will not fix everything • These objective processes will address the most critical needs • Other Critical Needs will Remain Jan 31, 2005

  25. Next Steps… • Identify specific projects • Brief Communities on the Results of the Process • Identify Costs & Schedules • Incorporate in the Strategic Execution Plan • Bond Oversight Committee review • Board Approval • Design & Construct Projects Jan 31, 2005

  26. For more information… • List of new construction projects at:http://www.laschools.org/sep/ • List of existing facilities modernization and repair projects: http://www.laschools.org/efsep/ Jan 31, 2005

More Related