1 / 20

F ORESTS AND THE K YOTO P ROTOCOL

F ORESTS AND THE K YOTO P ROTOCOL. Carbon Sinks in the CDM: Policy, Opportunities & Challenges. Darren C Goetze Senior Policy Advisor International Affairs Div., Climate Change Bureau. Overview. Environmental potential of sinks project Current status of sinks in the CDM

kosey
Download Presentation

F ORESTS AND THE K YOTO P ROTOCOL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FORESTS AND THE KYOTO PROTOCOL Carbon Sinks in the CDM: Policy, Opportunities & Challenges Darren C Goetze Senior Policy Advisor International Affairs Div., Climate Change Bureau

  2. Overview • Environmental potential of sinks project • Current status of sinks in the CDM • Towards a CDM sinks strategy • Case studies • Conclusion

  3. Potential Sinks Projects • Direct reduction of emissions • reducing deforestation by protecting forests under threat of conversion to agriculture or pasture, • reducing forest degradation by protecting natural forests from the impacts of human activities, • substituting biomass energy sources for fossil fuels, • slowing/reversing degradation of agricultural soils. • Indirect reduction of emissions via sequestration • restoring natural forests in deforested/degraded areas, • expanding agroforests and plantations.

  4. Co-benefits of Sinks Projects • Biodiversity • Habitat preservation/expansion • Desertification • Soil moisture conservation • Soil stabilization/erosion prevention • Socio-economic • Sustainable use of non-wood products • Economic development

  5. Bonn Agreement • Afforestation and reforestation projects eligible under the CDM • Credits limited to 1% of Annex I Party’s base year emissions per year • Equivalent to ca. 50 Mt C/yr (total Annex I)

  6. Marrakech Accord Relevant elements of the deal include: • Prompt start of the CDM • Modalities and procedures • Simplified modalities and procedures for some small-scale projects by CoP 8 • “Other project activities that both reduce anthropogenic emissions by sources and that directly emit less than 15 kt CO2/ yr”

  7. Missing Pieces Still required for operationalizing CDM afforestation and reforestation projects: • Definitions and modalities • Workshop before SBSTA 16 • Decision at CoP 9 • Good practice guidance • Part of IPCC work programme

  8. Definitions and Modalities • Definitions should be consistent with those decided for Article 3 activities • Modalities should be guided by the IPCC SR LULUCF project chapter

  9. Towards a Sinks Project Strategy Elements of Success • Secure, high-quality carbon credits • Risk-management and dilution key • Matching credit stream to investor carbon liabilities • Improved sustainability of ecosystem services • Deliver high co-benefits • Recognition of local resource use • Meet the need, don’t fight it • Contribution to local economic development • Sustainable income potentials, local partners

  10. Towards a Sinks Project Strategy Recommended focus: • Portfolio of multi-component projects that deliver high environmental co-benefits and engage local communities

  11. Case Study – Nyakach, Kenya Nyakach Region Biomass Enhancement Project • Reforestation of ca. marginal semi-arid low-lying plains in Nyakach region with sisal and Prosopis • Reduced rate of deforestation and environmental degradation • Co-benefits include • Soil rehabilitation • Quality fodder and cleaner biofuel for cooking and heating • Wood, fiber and dyes for local entrepreneurs • Poverty alleviation, improved living standard for women

  12. Case Study – Colombia Andean Biodiversity Corridor Project • Reforestation project to build 2 biodiversity corridors by restoring native biomes around existing forest fragments • Silvo-pastoril buffers on edges of the corridors • Build on ongoing research and conservation in corridors supported by GEF • Umbrella Project with heavy local involvement • Sequestration of ca. 76 Mt C over 50 year project lifetime

  13. Case Study – Colombia • Co-benefits include • Agro-forestry programs for local energy/heat • Wood Energy Source protects corridor • Silvo-pastoril milk cow management with nitrogen-fixing legumes • Provide High Quality Fodder for Cows • Coexists with Local Pasture Species

  14. Conclusion • Eligibility and credits limited, uncertainty remains, sinks still regarded with suspicion • 1st CP key: Must pick projects strategically, manage risk carefully and deliver high co-benefits FOR MORE INFO... Darren Goetze, Senior Policy Advisor Environment Canada < darren.goetze@ec.gc.ca >

More Related