Observations and nlfff modeling of ar 10953
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 15

Observations and NLFFF Modeling of AR 10953 PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 69 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Observations and NLFFF Modeling of AR 10953. Yingna Su 1,2 Collaborators: A. A. Van Ballegooijen 1 , E. E. Deluca 1 , Leon Golub 1 P. Grigis 1 , B. Lites 3, G. L. Huang 2 1. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, USA 2. Purple Mountain Observatory, China

Download Presentation

Observations and NLFFF Modeling of AR 10953

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Observations and nlfff modeling of ar 10953

Observations and NLFFF Modeling of AR 10953

Yingna Su1,2

Collaborators:A. A. Van Ballegooijen1, E. E. Deluca1, Leon Golub1

P. Grigis1, B. Lites3, G. L. Huang2

1.Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, USA

2. Purple Mountain Observatory, China

3. High Altitude Observatory, USA

AGU/SPD, Fort Lauderdale, 05/29/2008


Outline

Outline

  • Background

  • NLFFF Modeling of (pre-flare) AR 10953

  • Flux Rope Insertion Method

  • Data: SOHO/MDI, Hinode/SOT, KSO/H-alpha, Hinode/XRT

  • Observations of a C8.5 Flare in AR 10953

  • Data: Hinode/XRT, TRACE, RHESSI, MLSO/H-alpha

  • Interpretations and Conclusions


Background

Background

  • Existing methods for constructing NLFFFs (non-linear force free fields)

  • Most methods: extrapolating photospheric vector fields to the corona

    (Schijver et al. 2006).

  • The method we adopted: “flux rope insertion method”(van Ballegooijen 2004;

    Bobra etal. 2008) which requires line of sight magnetograms. This method was tested by

    Bobra et al. (2008), and the model was constrained by TRACE observations.

  • What is the 3D pre-flare magnetic configuration? Where and how

    is the flare initiated?

  • In this work, we construct NLFFF models for the pre-flare state

    of AR 10953, and the model is constrained by multiple non-potential

    X-ray loops observed by XRT.


Flux rope insertion method

Flux Rope Insertion Method

2007-May-02 17:30 UT

2007-May-02 11:31 UT

2007-May-02 14:59 UT

PF model

MDI+SOT/SP

KSO/H-alpha

XRT MDI+SOT/SP

Magneto

Insert Flux Rope

NLFFF Model

Friction

Van Ballegooijen 2004; Bobra et al. 2008


Model constraint x ray loops

Model Constraint: X-ray Loops

  • Best fit model field lines for four non-potential X-ray loops

  • Model Free Parameters: Axial flux and Poloidal flux of the flux rope


Observations and nlfff modeling of ar 10953

Calculation Solution Set

Table 1 The Average Distance (in solar radii) of the projected best-fit model field lines from the observed X-ray loops for various models with fixed Poloidal Flux (1e10 Mx/cm).

  • Best Fit Model: Axial Flux=7e20±2e20 Mx , Poloidal Flux ~ 1e9 to 1e11 Mx/cm (larger range); Eruption for Axial Flux~ 15e20 Mx

  • Loop 4 may be in a non-stable state.


Observations and nlfff modeling of ar 10953

Comparison with SOT/SP Vector Magnetogram

Blue Vector: Observation Black Vector: Model

Best Fit Model: Axial Flux=7e20 and 9e20 Mx


Observations and nlfff modeling of ar 10953

Vector Magnetogram: Obs. Versus Mod.

worst fit good fit worse fit

Blue Vector: Observation Black Vector: Model

Best Fit Model: Axial Flux=7e20 and 9e20 Mx


Observations and nlfff modeling of ar 10953

Observations of C8.5 Flare

MLSO/H-alpha TRACE/171 XRT/Ti_poly

  • Filament activation (23:30 UT) associated with the flare was seen in H-alpha and EUV, not X-ray.

  • Two-ribbon flare: unsheared-sheared-unsheared.

  • Not associated with filament eruption and CME.


Observations and nlfff modeling of ar 10953

Light Curves of C8.5 Flare

EUV flare starts about 20 minutes later than the

X-ray (XRT and RHESSI) flare, Why?


Observations and nlfff modeling of ar 10953

Pre-EUV flare X-ray brightenings

XRT

XRT

RHESSI

XRT

TRACE

RHESSI Spectral fitting suggests that the pre-EUV flare X-ray sources are mainly caused by thermal bremsstrahlung emission.


Observations and nlfff modeling of ar 10953

Where Does the Flare Start?

flare loop

XRT 2007-May-02 23:09:24 UT

Z=14

flare loop

*

Reconnection site?

Current layer

At flare onset, the flare loop is unsheared. This suggests the flare starts near the outer edgeof the flux rope.


Conclusions i

Conclusions (I)

  • Comparison of modeled and observed X-ray loops for pre-flare (C8.5) state of AR 10953

    Axial Flux: 7e20±2e20 Mx (good constraints from X-ray loops)

    Poloidal Flux: 1e9-1e11 Mx/cm (wide range)

    Upper limit: Axial Flux~15e20 Mx

    Free Energy: ~0.85e32 erg, Potential Energy: 9.62e32 erg

    Similar result obtained by comparisons of observed and modeled photospheric vector magnetograms.

  • The axial flux (7e20±2e20 Mx) in the flux rope is far away from the upper limit (15e20 Mx) for eruption, which is consistent with the fact that no successful filament eruption occurred in this active region.


Conclusions ii

Conclusions (II)

  • The X-ray brightenings appear about 20 minutes earlier than the EUV flare associated with a filament activation, which may be caused by the localized coronal heating.

    Open question: Why does the heating not propagate to the chromosphere where EUV flare occurs?

  • This flare starts from unsheared brightenings,unlike most two-ribbon flares(Su et al. 2007).

  • Interpretation: the flare starts near the outer edge of the flux rope, Not at the inner side or at the bottom as suggested in the standard flare model (e.g., Moore et al. 2001).


Thank you for your attention

Thank you for your attention !


  • Login