developing an inclusive social policy azerbaijan s idp schools
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Developing an Inclusive Social Policy: Azerbaijan’s IDP schools

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 28

Developing an Inclusive Social Policy: Azerbaijan’s IDP schools - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 97 Views
  • Uploaded on

Developing an Inclusive Social Policy: Azerbaijan’s IDP schools. Center for Innovations in Education Vitaly Radsky. 1. Data Is there a difference in educational achievement between IDP and non-IDP schools and regions? 2.How and Why? - Social exclusion concept 3. Policy .

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Developing an Inclusive Social Policy: Azerbaijan’s IDP schools' - kordell


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
developing an inclusive social policy azerbaijan s idp schools

Developing an Inclusive Social Policy: Azerbaijan’s IDP schools

Center for Innovations in Education

Vitaly Radsky

slide2

1. Data

  • Is there a difference in educational achievement between IDP and non-IDP schools and regions?

2.How and Why?

- Social exclusion concept

3. Policy

question 1 is there a difference between the school achievement of idp and non idp regions
Question 1: Is there a difference between the school achievement of IDP and non-IDP regions?
  • H0= There is no difference between the university admission rate of IDP and non-IDP schools in Azerbaijan.
  • HA= There is a significant difference between the university admission rate of IDP and non-IDP schools in Azerbaijan.
national
National

χ2 (1, N = 86857) = 38.148, p <.01.

Students at IDP schools are less likely to be accepted by universities than students at non-IDP schools.

slide6

χ2 (1, N = 74779) = 28.053, p <.01.

Students at IDP schools are less likely to be accepted by universities than students at non-IDP schools.

urban areas
Urban Areas

χ2 (1, N = 28962) = 47.268, p <.01.

Students at IDP schools located in urban areas (including Baku) are less likely to be accepted by universities than students at non-IDP schools studying in urban areas.

rural areas
Rural Areas

χ2 (1, N = 44294) = 26.667, p <.01.

Students at IDP schools located in rural areas are less likely to be accepted by universities than students at non-IDP schools studying in rural areas.

result
Result
  • HA= There is a significant difference between the university admission rate of IDP and non-IDP schools in Azerbaijan.
  • Nationally, and when controlling for school location, IDP schools send proportionally fewer students to university than non-IDP schools.
slide11

χ2 (1, N = 21067) = 21.668, p < .01.

There is a significant difference between the proportion of students accepted to university from IDP schools based in Baku and non-IDP Baku schools. The difference in proportion of students accepted to universities were significant between Baku and Susa, Fuzuli, and Agdam (but not Lachin and Qubadli).

slide12

χ2 (1, N = 21067) = 27.493, p < .01.

There is a significant difference between the proportion of students accepted to university between Baku non-IDP schools and Baku-based Susa, Fuzuli, and Agdam schools.

slide14

(z = -3.07, p < .05, one-tailed)

There is a significant difference between the proportion of students accepted to

university between Lachin Baku and Sumgayit based schools and non-IDP schools

In Baku and Sumgayit.

slide15

(z = -2.933, p < .05, one-tailed)

There is a significant difference between the proportion of students accepted to

university between Lachin rural-based schools and non-IDP schools based in the rural

regions where Lachin schools are located.

result1
Result
  • HA= There is a significant difference between the university admission rate of IDP and non-IDP schools in Azerbaijan.
  • When controlling for school location, IDP schools send proportionally fewer students to university than non-IDP schools.
question 2 what role does geography have in the differing results of idp schools
Question 2: What role does geography have in the differing results of IDP schools?
  • H0= There is no difference in the university admission rate in schools in different IDP regions in Azerbaijan.
  • HA= There is a significant difference in the university admission rate between schools in different IDP regions in Azerbaijan.
slide18

χ2 (9, N = 3942) = 77.53886, p <.01. There is a significant difference in the proportion of students admitted to university between IDP districts.

slide20

χ2 (4, N = 1156) = 3.836, p >.1.

There is no significant difference between the proportion of students accepted to university among students studying in urban-based IDP schools (5 IDP regions).

slide21

χ2 (2, N = 1339) = 4.3695, p >.1.

There is no significant difference between the proportion of students accepted to university among students studying in rural-based IDP schools (5 IDP regions).

result2
Result
  • Ho= There is not a significant difference in the university admission rate between schools in different IDP regions in Azerbaijan, once location of school is controlled.
  • What separates overall lower achieving IDP regions such as Agdam and higher achieving regions such as Qubadli is school location, rather than something like regional education management.
social exclusion
Social Exclusion

“a way of conceptualizing society, including (and with a focus on) the processes of deprivation that are an integral part of that society.”

-de Haan, 2000

  • 1) Multidimensionality
  • 2) Causation (how and why)
    • interactions, processes, actors, and institutions that “include some groups and exclude others.”

-de Haan, 2000

stigma and isolation
Stigma and Isolation
  • “Some people compare Sumgait schools with Sumgait IDP school—this is not fair. They have richer parents, we have a IDP status label, that is why there is a small number of students who want to come to our school.” (Qubadli teacher, FGD, 2011)
educational human resources
Educational Human Resources
  • “a good young teacher will never chose an IDP school over a regular school when choosing a job.” (Baku Education Inspector, Interview, 2011)
conclusion
Conclusion

1. Disadvantaged or Not?

We need more data comparing educational results of IDP and non-IDP students.

2. Why and How?

Social exclusion offers a new way to look at deprivation and inequality in Azerbaijan.

3. What Policies?

slide28

Thank You

Center for Innovations in Education

www.cie.az

Vitaly Radsky

[email protected]

ad