1 / 17

PSA Level 2 Source Term Approach in the Loviisa NPP

PSA Level 2 Source Term Approach in the Loviisa NPP. T. Routamo, S. Siltanen , P. Lundström Fortum Nuclear Services, Finland OECD/CSNI International Workshop on Level 2 PSA and Severe Accident Management Köln, Germany, 29-31 March 2004. Outline. SAM approach of the Loviisa NPP

konane
Download Presentation

PSA Level 2 Source Term Approach in the Loviisa NPP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PSA Level 2 Source Term Approach in the Loviisa NPP T. Routamo, S. Siltanen, P. Lundström Fortum Nuclear Services, Finland OECD/CSNI International Workshop on Level 2 PSA and Severe Accident Management Köln, Germany, 29-31 March 2004 Fortum Nuclear Services

  2. Outline • SAM approach of the Loviisa NPP • Tool for source term calculation in PSA 2 (SaTu) • Sample results • Uncertainty calculation • Conclusions Fortum Nuclear Services

  3. Loviisa NPP • Specific features: • Ice condenser containment (volume 58 000 m3, design pressure of 1.7 bar) • Horizontal SGs • Low decay power level • Narrow reactor cavity • No penetration in the RPV lower head Fortum Nuclear Services

  4. SAM Mitigation in the Loviisa NPP • Successful containment isolation • Primary system depressurisation • Mitigation of hydrogen combustion • Reactor pressure vessel lower head coolability and melt retention • Long-term containment cooling Fortum Nuclear Services

  5. SaTu - Introduction • Update of Loviisa PSA level 2 for internal events in at-power states due in 2004 - SaTu as a new source term model • Initially built as a support system for radiation experts (two modes: radiation level mode and PSA 2 ST mode) • Calculations are based on user input and fixed parameters modelling the processes and phenomena during severe accidents • Approach to describe the release from core and transport with simple models (implemented in Excel) Fortum Nuclear Services

  6. SaTu - Transport solution (basic idea) • Constant source (S) and removal rate (k) • Source formed as a combination of the release from the core and fission product flows from consecutive compartments, and averaged in each time step • Calculation of one compartment at a time • Mass loss in the containment loop flow avoided by special treatment of the returning mass flow • Mathematical solution considered adequate Fortum Nuclear Services

  7. SaTu - System Description (Flow Chart) Fortum Nuclear Services

  8. SaTu - System Description (1) • Modelled processes • FP and hydrogen release from the core • Effect of ECCS injection recovery • Deposition in the primary and secondary circuits and in the auxiliary system piping • Transport along with gas and water flows • Deposition in the containment • diffusiophoresis • sedimentation • effect of ice condensers • containment spray system • containment external spray Fortum Nuclear Services

  9. SaTu - System Description (2) • Modelled processes (cont'd) • Hydrogen recombination • Iodine chemistry (formation of gaseous and organic iodine) • Leakage out of the containment • Transport and deposition in the areas outside the containment • Release to the environment • Parameters affecting the fission product behaviour are based on experimental data and code calculations. Fortum Nuclear Services

  10. SaTu - Input Data • Essential input information • LOCA type (used for defining the leak location) • Openings through the main deck (containment loop flow mode) • Time of core uncovery (FP release from degrading core) • SAM measures (depressurisation, IC doors, containment external spray) • Possible time of ECCS injection recovery • Emergency water resources and sump water level (amount of ice in ICs) • Containment internal spray flow rate (FP washout) • Containment pressure and leakages (FP release out of the containment) • Ventilation system flow rates (FP transport in areas outside the cont.) • Status of stack filters (FP retention from stack release) Fortum Nuclear Services

  11. SaTu - User Interface • Built on several workbooks • PSA 2 ST calculation mode • User input and FP transport calculation • Limited amount of input information • Input mainly based on plant measurements • Results in a graphical form • Additional workbooks in the radiation level mode • Activity of radionuclides • Coefficients for activity conversion to radiation levels • Dose rates at control centres and at some additional areas • Dose rates at a selected time in plant layout drawings • Pre-calculated accident sequences Fortum Nuclear Services

  12. Fortum Nuclear Services

  13. SaTu - User Interface (Sample Output) Fortum Nuclear Services

  14. SaTu - User Interface (Sample Output) Fortum Nuclear Services

  15. SaTu - Uncertainty Environment • Parameters of the FP modelling not accurately known • Uncertainty calculation environment was implemented • Monte Carlo simulation used to study the overall effect of the fixed parameter variations (sequence uncertainties e.g. timing of events not included) • A single case runs in SaTu in some seconds (immediate result) • A thousand case simulation in less than two hours • Results shown as percentiles of the FP release behaviour • Possibility to find out the modelling deficiencies Fortum Nuclear Services

  16. SaTu - Uncertainty Calculation Example Fortum Nuclear Services

  17. SaTu - Conclusions • Capabilities of SaTu seem adequate, some models still need revising though. • Issues specifically important (e.g. SAM measures) for the Loviisa NPP are included in the system. • SaTu is fast-running and easy to use compared with integral codes. • Uncertainty environment help in justification of the reliability of the results. Fortum Nuclear Services

More Related