1 / 13

Characteristics Properties

konane
Download Presentation

Characteristics Properties

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. 1

    2. Characteristics & Properties A gathering of incidents, always concerning the author. It confronts the owner with the question 'so what?’ Pebble call it: "a purposeful aggregation of digital items - ideas, evidence, reflections, feedback, data etc - which ‘present’ a selected audience with information about the subject of that eportfolio"

    3. Characteristics & Properties It harvests assets  It promotes critical friendship and co-mentoring 

    4. Characteristics & Properties It says 'hello world, this is me' 

    5. How might technology help students develop study skills? To move students from the first to second descriptor is nothing new. TechnologyHow might technology help students develop study skills? To move students from the first to second descriptor is nothing new. Technology

    6. What we know about Reflective Portfolios Firstly we aren't good at reflecting We aren't good about filling space with our learning & Development Not everyone 'gets it'

    7. Who has control? Hosting, accessing, choosing content,

    8. What we know about Reflective Portfolios Reflective Portfolios ask you to confront your own experiences and their consequences

    10. Why are they separate? This slide explains the difference between an e-Individual Learning Plan and an e-portfolio from a Virtual Learning Environment. The characteristics of the two are sufficiently different to keep them in separate technologies. This is a useful checklist for both technologies in that a ‘good’ portfolio or ILP should allow these characteristics. It follows that this slide suggests that VLEs and e-portfolios should be separate and e-ILPs even more so. The Thanet Model suggests why e-portfolios and VLEs should be kept separate One is owned by the college, the content of the other by the student. One is for communication and teaching; the other is for wider reflection and development One is capable of greater personalisation than the other (and should be!) One is a more public forum than the other and will therefore foster a different approach from the learner The take up and usages will be occurring at different speed. We fear that the technology/functionality/software that drives each may be compromised in order to accommodate the other. The College has a much clearer aim of what should end up in the VLE at the end of the course as opposed to what will end up in the e-portfolios that is under control of the learner In one the subject matter is always the author and is introspective, the other has any subject matter and is often written for the benefit of others One is an end in itself; the other is one part of a lifelong journey. Why are they separate? This slide explains the difference between an e-Individual Learning Plan and an e-portfolio from a Virtual Learning Environment. The characteristics of the two are sufficiently different to keep them in separate technologies. This is a useful checklist for both technologies in that a ‘good’ portfolio or ILP should allow these characteristics. It follows that this slide suggests that VLEs and e-portfolios should be separate and e-ILPs even more so. The Thanet Model suggests why e-portfolios and VLEs should be kept separate One is owned by the college, the content of the other by the student. One is for communication and teaching; the other is for wider reflection and development One is capable of greater personalisation than the other (and should be!) One is a more public forum than the other and will therefore foster a different approach from the learner The take up and usages will be occurring at different speed. We fear that the technology/functionality/software that drives each may be compromised in order to accommodate the other. The College has a much clearer aim of what should end up in the VLE at the end of the course as opposed to what will end up in the e-portfolios that is under control of the learner In one the subject matter is always the author and is introspective, the other has any subject matter and is often written for the benefit of others One is an end in itself; the other is one part of a lifelong journey.

    11. What we know about Reflective Portfolios They offer Authentic learning Accidental Learning Sustainable Learning

    14. 14

More Related