1 / 28

Watershed Slope Lower Bounds for Methods

Watershed Slope Lower Bounds for Methods. EWRI-2012 21 MAY 2012. Acknowledgements. Texas Department of Transportation; “0-6384 Establish Effective Lower Bounds of Watershed Slope for Traditional Hydrologic Methods”. Project Team. Theodore G. Cleveland - Texas Tech University

komala
Download Presentation

Watershed Slope Lower Bounds for Methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Watershed Slope Lower Bounds for Methods EWRI-2012 21 MAY 2012

  2. Acknowledgements • Texas Department of Transportation; “0-6384 Establish Effective Lower Bounds of Watershed Slope for Traditional Hydrologic Methods”

  3. Project Team • Theodore G. Cleveland - Texas Tech University • Ming-Han Li – Texas A&M University • William H. Asquith – USGS • Xing Fang – Auburn University • David B. Thompson – R.O. Anderson Inc.

  4. Why does slope matter? • Magnitude

  5. Why does slope matter? • Direction

  6. Rainfall Intensity Rainfall Intensity

  7. Why does slope matter? • Losses/Storage

  8. Why does slope matter? • Drainage channel has capacity – but water “slow” to get there.

  9. Why does slope matter? • Simple expression of time in terms of speed and distance • Expression for time in hydrology

  10. Why does slope matter? • Consequences of “slope” in denominator • As slope vanishes time becomes huge. • Huge time impacts intensity estimate. • Huge time impacts unit hydrograph behavior.

  11. What we did • Defined low slope • Literature interpretation • Experiments (Physical and Numerical) • Developed alternative methods • Parametric study using numerical model • Created an “adjustment” for low-slope hydrology • Developed plan for future monitoring • Emerging technologies needed

  12. Defining Low Slope • Literature interpretation

  13. Low Slope Alternate Methods • Experiments • Rainfall simulator • Small plot – paved • Small plot – grass

  14. Low Slope Alternate Methods • Small Plot “Paved”

  15. Low Slope Alternate Methods • Small Plot – “Grass”

  16. Low Slope Alternate Methods • Experiment Purpose • Obtain data for validating a computer model • Computer model used for the parametric study to develop guidelines for low-slope hydrologic computations. • Experiment Summary • Simulator slopes range from 0 to 5% • Field slopes are 0.25% (0.0025) • Paved, grass, bare-earth surfaces represented

  17. Low Slope Alternate Methods • Experimental Data Interpretation • Diffusion-Hydrodynamic-Model (DHM) to interpret experimental results • Use DHM to examine behavior in a parametric study to develop alternative estimation tools.

  18. Low Slope Alternate Methods • Experimental Data Interpretation • Literature Studies

  19. Low Slope Alternate Methods • Experimental Data Interpretation • Literature Studies

  20. Low Slope Alternate Methods • Experimental Data Interpretation • Our Experiments

  21. Low Slope Alternate Methods • Parametric Study

  22. Low Slope Alternate Methods • Parametric Study

  23. Low Slope Alternate Methods • Additional support for where “low slope” begins – about 0.5% or smaller • Use the DHM to investigate alternate method for time in hydrologic models

  24. Low Slope Alternate Methods • Impermeable surfaces • Low slope starts at 0.005

  25. Low Slope Alternate Methods • Permeable surfaces • Low slope starts at 0.005 • A unified general equation could not be found, instead three based on dominant soil type • Mathematical structure same, exponents are different by soil, the offset lower bound is the same.

  26. Aggregate Observational Database • 100+ watersheds • Low and moderate slopes • Small and large areas • All plot along similar pattern except for two.

  27. Monitoring Plan • Discovered that current measurement technologies are not low-slope compatible. • Use existing culverts as gaging stations, should the need arise. • Emergent (low-cost) technologies that can make the measurements in low-slope conditions • Laser and reflective targets • Visible/IR image interpretation • Pressure sondes

  28. Conclusions • Defined low slope, about 0.3% and smaller. • Alternative timing model to use in such conditions. • Emerging technology needs to be deployed to measure discharges on low slope. • Guidance in final report on how to use these findings. (available July 2012)

More Related