Introduction to geneva atlas high level trigger activities
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 17

Introduction to Geneva ATLAS High Level Trigger Activities PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Introduction to Geneva ATLAS High Level Trigger Activities. Xin Wu Journée de réflexion du DPNC, 11 septembre, 2007 Participants Assitant(e)s: Gauthier Alexandre, Francesca Bucci, Till Eifert, Clemencia Mora MA: Olivier Gaumer, Andrew Hamilton, Phillip Urquijo (20/09/07)

Download Presentation

Introduction to Geneva ATLAS High Level Trigger Activities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

Introduction to geneva atlas high level trigger activities

Introduction to Geneva ATLAS High Level Trigger Activities

Xin Wu

Journée de réflexion du DPNC, 11 septembre, 2007


Assitant(e)s: Gauthier Alexandre, Francesca Bucci, Till Eifert, Clemencia Mora

MA: Olivier Gaumer, Andrew Hamilton, Phillip Urquijo (20/09/07)

Physiciens: Szymon Gadomski, Xin Wu

The challenge of trigger at lhc

The Challenge of Trigger at LHC

  • Bunch crossing40 MHz

  • σ total70 mb

  • Event rate~1 GHz

  • Number of event/BC~25

  • Number of part./event~1500

  • Event size~1.5MB

  • Mass storage rate~200Hz

Event rate 

Level-1 

Level-2 

Mass Storage 

Offline Analyses

  • Need to have Trigger of high performance

    • ~6 order of rate reduction

    • Complex event and 140 M channels

Brief introduction to the atlas trigger system


















Brief Introduction to the ATLAS Trigger System

Calo MuTrigDet

Other detectors

LVL1: Hardware Trigger

  • EM, TAU, JET calo. clusters

  • µ trigger chambers tracks

  • Total and missing energy

40 MHz

1 PB/s


2.5 ms







LVL1 Acc.

100 kHz


HLT: PC farms

  • LVL2: special fast algorithms

    • Access data directly from the ROS system

    • Partial reconstruction seeded with L1 Regions of Interest (RoIs)

  • EF: offline reco. algorithms

    • Access to fully built event

    • Seeded with LVL2 objects (full event reconst. possible)

    • Up to date calibrations

120 GB/s

(Region of Interest)









RoI data


3 GB/s

LVL2 Acc.

Event Builder

3 kHz

Event Filter


EF Acc.

200 Hz

Event Size ~1.5 MB

300 MB/s

Geneva s participation in high level trigger

Geneva’s Participation in High Level Trigger

  • Calorimeter Trigger Software (Gauthier, Olivier, Xin)

    • Overall coordination

    • LVL2 calorimeter cluster correction

  • HLT Steering Controller (Till)

    • Control the complex algorithm scheduling for ROI based reconstruction and Stepwise processing for early rejection (see Till’s talk)

  • Online integration of the HLT algorithms (Xin)

    • Integrate the HLT algorithms developed offline into the DAQ online running environment

  • Trigger Event Data Model (Andrew, Francesca)

    • Manage trigger objects stored in data (see Andrew’s talk)

  • EF tracking software (Andrew, Francesca)

    • Adapt offline track reconstruction for EF (see Andrew’s talk)

  • Express stream (Syzmon)

    • Special data stream for fast reconstruction

  • ATLAS Trigger Coordination (Xin)

Calorimeter trigger software

Calorimeter Trigger Software

  • Collaborative effort of many people

    • Common first steps for all the “slices”: electron, photon, jet, tau, missing energy

  • LVL1 hardware simulation

  • Calorimeter RegionSelector

    • Mapping between detector elements and -region for using Region of Interest

  • Calorimeter data preparation

    • Fast raw data unpacking

  • LVL2 calorimeter reconstruction

    • Specific fast clustering algorithms

  • LVL2 cluster calibration

    • Energy correction, position correction, crack correction,…

  • Event Filter calorimeter reconstruction

    • Adapt offline algorithms for EF

  • Overall coordination

L2 em cluster corrections olivier gauthier

L2 EM Cluster Corrections (Olivier, Gauthier)

  • Lateral energy correction

    • Better Energy evaluation (10% effect)

  • S-shape correction (sampling 2)

    • Better position reconstruction

  • Longitudinal energy correction : Material and leakage

    • Better energy resolution

  • Energy  correction and  correction + accordion modulations for different clusters

  • Crack corrections (local correction)

    •  = 0.8 : crack between the two electrodes of the barrel

    •  = 1.4 : crack between barrel and end-cap

  • Currently first 2 corrections implemented using offline constants

    • Study effect on trigger in progress

Energy correction effects

Energy correction - Effects

From Olivier

  • Used to give the best energy resolution  Get the best efficiency

  • On set of parameters per  position

  • Energy calibration based on offline calibration:

    •  global factor (lateral leakage)

    • off : offset

    • wi: weights on pre-sampler and layer 3 energy

  • MZ reconstructed from electron pairs

    • - With energy correction

    • - Without energy correction

S shape correction study

.Before correction

.After correction

S-shape correction study

From Olivier

Function proposed for this correction : Where


This function is actually modified to ensure the continuity at |u|=1

The variables are redefined to remove correlations between them

At the end the actual function used is :


  • Only 3 parameters left tabulated as

  • function of energy

  • An interpolation in energy is done

  • on the parameters

Online integration of hlt algorithms

Online Integration of HLT Algorithms

  • Integrate the HLT algorithms developed offline into the DAQ online running environment

  • HLT algorithms developed in the offline framework because they use many offline reconstruction tools (more on EF, less on LVL2)

    • Read MC pool RDO files and use transient BS

    • Run together with Reconstruction

    • Well suited (fast turn-around) for trigger performance studies

  • Online running is quite different from offline

    • Transition controlled by DataFlow software rather than Athena

    • Read ByteStream raw data from ROS through DAQ

    • Need to interface to online monitoring/error reporting tools

    • Need to be thread-safe for multithreaded running

  • Online integration involves many components of the HLT:

    • Algorithms, trigger configuration, database, Steering Controller, Data Collection, …

    • Follow through integration steps from offline, quasi-online (Athena MT/PT) tests all the way up till final online validation at point-1

Steps of online integration

Steps of Online Integration

Offline Environment

Simulated Online Environment

DAQ Data Flow




Steering Controller

Steering Controller

Steering Controller




1) Test offline

  • RDO input

  • Raw (BS) input

  • 2) Test with athenaMT

    • simulate online

    • BS input

    • use TDAQ release

  • 3) Test at Point 1

    • actual DAQ

    • BS input (through ROS)

Daq hlt technical runs

DAQ/HLT Technical Runs

  • Dedicated Technical Runs (1 week each) are used to test DAQ/HLT and HLT algorithm integration

    • So far two in 2007 (March and May). Next in end of September

  • Brief Summary of the May TR (21/5-25/5)

    • ‘Final’ Hardware

      • ROIB (+ LVL1 emulator), 120 ROSs

      • 4 HLT racks (130 dual quad-core 1.8 GHz), ~5% final system

    • tdaq-01-07-00, AtlasHLT 2.0.5-HLT, Offline 12.0.5-HLT-1

    • All basic HLT slices integrated

      • e10, g10, mu6, tau10, jet20, cosmic, Bphysics, met

      • combined : e10+g10+mu6+tau10+jet20

    • ~ 6k events (mixed physics processes, ~60% jets and ~40% W/Z)

  • Main achievement :

    • Validated TDAQ and HLT infrastructure with final hardware

    • Measurements with dummy algorithm LVL2 and EF with final hardware

    • Functionality test with combined algorithm

    • Tested DBProxy and triggerDB configuration

  • Next Technical Run: Sept 24-30

Lvl2 timing for rejected events

LVL2 Timing for Rejected Events

Total time per event

Processing time per event

mean = 31.5 ms

mean = 25.7 ms

Data requests per event

Data collection time per event

mean = 5.3

mean = 6.0 ms

Express stream szymon

Express Stream (Szymon)

  • ATLAS data streams

Calibration streams contain incomplete events.

Complete physics events used for calibration are in the Express.

Express stream of atlas data

From Szymon

Express Stream of ATLAS data

What is the Express Stream

  • One of the data streams produced by ATLAS online, O(10%) of the physics data.

  • To be reconstructed and looked at rapidly. Results in a few hours, before the reconstruction starts.

  • Calibration, check of data quality, monitoring of the detector status, rapid alert on interesting events…

    Role of Geneva

  • S.Gadomski coordinates the work on the trigger menu.

  • Trigger rates are calculated on Swiss ATLAS Grid resources, in collaboration with Bern (Sigve Haug).



  • ATLAS HLT project is in good progress

    • Trigger algorithm development in advanced stage

    • Trigger menu for early data-taking being completed

    • HLT being integrated online and performance being studied in Technical Runs

  • Over the pas year Geneva expanded its effort in the ATLAS High Level Trigger and made many important contributions

  • We are becoming key players in several areas

    • Calorimeter Trigger Software, Steering, EDM, Online Integration, Express Stream, Trigger Coordination

    • See Till and Andrew talks for some more details

  • Expertise in HLT is a great advantage for the group to access and understand real data at the earliest stage

Lvl2 egamma reconstruction algorithm



LVL2 Egamma Reconstruction Algorithm

4 Processing steps of T2CaloEgamma

at each step data request is made and accept/reject decision is possible

Rcore= E3x7/E7X7 in EM Sampling 2

Eratio=(E1-E2)/(E1+E2) in EM Sampling 1

EtEm=Total EM Energy (add sampling 0 and 3)

EtHad=Hadronic Energy (Tile or HEC)

Calorimeter timing results from the may tr

Calorimeter Timing Results from the May TR



mean 16ms / RoI

mean 6.2ms / RoI



mean 27ms / RoI

mean 65ms /RoI

  • Login