Edom labs inc v lichter 102 u s p q 2d 1434 ttab 2012
Download
1 / 21

Edom Labs., Inc. v. Lichter , 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1434 (TTAB 2012) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 142 Views
  • Uploaded on

Edom Labs., Inc. v. Lichter , 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1434 (TTAB 2012). 1. CHIRO-KLENZ v. SUPER CHIRO. “FROM THE ORIGINAL MAKERS OF CHIRO-KLENZ” …. 2. But I Already Own The Mark!. In re Strategic Partners, Inc., 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1397 (TTAB 2012). ANYWEARS. The 13 th duPont Factor. ANYWEARS.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Edom Labs., Inc. v. Lichter , 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1434 (TTAB 2012) ' - knut


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Edom labs inc v lichter 102 u s p q 2d 1434 ttab 2012
Edom Labs., Inc. v. Lichter, 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1434 (TTAB 2012)

1


Chiro klenz v super chiro
CHIRO-KLENZ v. SUPER CHIRO

“FROM THE ORIGINAL MAKERS OF CHIRO-KLENZ”…

2


But i already own the mark
But I Already Own The Mark!

In re Strategic Partners, Inc.,

102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1397 (TTAB 2012)

ANYWEARS


The 13 th dupont factor
The 13thduPont Factor

ANYWEARS

“Any other established fact probative of the effect of use.”

S


Dilution cases
Dilution Cases

NASDAQ v. NASDAQ (sporting goods & clothing) – 2003

The Other White Meat v. The Other Red Meat (salmon) – 2010

[Nike] Just Do It v. Just Jesu It (clothing) – 2011

Motown v. Motown Metal (toy vehicles) - 2011

5


Lack of dilution coach v coach
Lack of Dilution: Coach v. Coach

Coach Services Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLC,

668 F.3d 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

6


Dilution blackberry v crackberry
Dilution:Blackberry v. Crackberry

Research in Motion Ltd. v. Defining Presence Mktg. Group and Axel Ltd. Inc.,102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1187 (TTAB 2012)

7


Federal registration defense
Federal Registration Defense

Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences v. Alliance of Professionals & Consultants, Inc.,

104 U.S.P.Q.2d 1234 (TTAB 2012)

8


Federal registration defense1
Federal Registration Defense

Section 1125(c)(6) – Ownership of a federal registration is a complete bar to any action:

(A)(i) [now (A)] is brought by another person under the common law or a statute of a State; and

(ii) [now (B)(i)] seeks to prevent dilution by blurring or dilution by tarnishment; or

(B) [now (B)(ii)] asserts any claim of actual or likely damage or harm to the distinctiveness or reputation of a mark, label, or form of advertisement.

9



Merely descriptive section 2 e
Merely Descriptive – Section 2(e)

  • SNAP

  • SNAP SIMPLY SAFER; and

  • For medical syringes and needles

Duopross Meditech v. Inviro Medical,

685 F.3d 1046, 103 U.S.P.Q.2d 1753 (Fed. Cir. 2012)


Merely descriptive vs suggestive
Merely Descriptive vs. Suggestive

Duopross Meditech v. Inviro Medical,

685 F.3d 1046, 103 U.S.P.Q.2d 1753 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

  • Forthwith conveys an immediate idea of the ingredients, qualities, or characteristics of the goods

  • Requires imagination, thought, and perception to reach a conclusion about the nature of the goods


Merely descriptive vs suggestive1
Merely Descriptive vs. Suggestive

Duopross Meditech v. Inviro Medical,

685 F.3d 1046, 103 U.S.P.Q.2d 1753 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

  • May ascertain the meaning and weight of each component

  • Must consider the mark as a whole

  • Must consider the mark in relation to the goods


Duopross Meditech v. Inviro Medical,

685 F.3d 1046, 103 U.S.P.Q.2d 1753 (Fed. Cir. 2012)


Merely descriptive vs suggestive2
Merely Descriptive vs. Suggestive

Duopross Meditech v. Inviro Medical,

685 F.3d 1046, 103 U.S.P.Q.2d 1753 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

  • Self-laudatory and puffing marks are regarded as descriptive

  • SNAP SIMPLY SAFER - lauds the safety of the products


Generic vs merely descriptive
Generic vs. Merely Descriptive

In re Tennis Industry Association, 102 U.S.P.Q.2d 1671 (TTAB 2012)


Baroness Small Estates v. American Wine Trade, 104 U.S.P.Q.2d 1224 (TTAB 2012)

“A Blend of

Cabernets -

Merlot - Syrah”


Stylizations apart from words
Stylizations Apart From Words

In re Sadoru Group, Ltd.,

__ U.S.P.Q.2d ____ (TTAB 2012)


Acronyms initialisms and japanese calligraphy
Acronyms, Initialisms And Japanese Calligraphy


ad